ipl-logo

Us Policy Of Containment Dbq Essay

657 Words3 Pages

Imagine if you lived in a place where you had no freedom, and you were ruled by a man like Joseph Stalin. That is what it would be like in many countries if it weren’t for the United States’ policy of containment. During the Cold War, the Soviet Union wanted to take over other countries and make them have the government system of Communism. The United States didn’t like that, because they thought their governmental system of Democracy was better. As a result, the U.S. adopted a policy of “Containment”. Stopping the spread of Communism through military and nonmilitary ways. The Soviets had expansive tendencies. The Soviets wanted to isolate West Berlin from the West and take them over. From Document A, In these circumstances it is clear that the main element of any United States policy …show more content…

The attack comes without warning and President Harry Truman, with the help of the United Nations, vows to defend democratic South Korea. The Containment Policy stated that the US would support any nation that are being oppressed by communism and cannot protect themselves from it. This became America’s major reason to intervene in the Korean War. However, the policy of containment came under attack due casualties and economic issues that the policy created. One of the major effects that over extended the powers of American foreign policy is that it gave the US a reason to interfere with any war they wanted as long as it involved communism. Therefore, this policy can be easily abused as it can serve for a way to allow the US obtain its national interest, rather than just fighting for democracy. This was a major factor in the Korean War since the South Korean government that stated they were democratic, were actually controlled by a dictator. American policy became highly criticized because it implied that the US only used the policy of containment to satisfy its own

Show More
Related
606 Words | 3 Pages

“Why and in what ways did the United States change its foreign policy from 1918-1953?” Since World War I, the united states had always had a problem with forcing its foreign policy. Throughout the past 100 years, the foreign policy has changed depending on public opinion and what was going on in other parts of the world. One of the largest changes in the foreign policy occurred from the end of World War I (1918) up until the ending of the Korean War (1953). Essentially the U.S foreign policy evolved from isolationist “prevention of war” to interventionism “protective containment of communism”.

Read More
1094 Words | 5 Pages

Here a policy of containment was first implemented by the US, which would involve the use of foreign alliances and intervention of foreign affairs in order to prevent the spread of communism and the influence of the USSR. Document 7 is explicit in affirming that the US remains the best chance for peace in the world while the USSR seeks war, but as opposed to a policy of isolationism, the new US foreign policy accepted a position of global leadership in actually organizing the world against the threat of communism and the USSR. This would require a concentrated and sustained role in foreign affairs unlike the US or the world had ever experienced before. Indeed, Document 2 illustrates how after WWII, US defense spending remained at very high levels compared to other peace times throughout the 20th century. This demonstrates the high level of involvement the US would have in events around the

Read More
241 Words | 1 Pages

The Korean War was a proxy war fought between the United States and the USSR, for the purpose of gaining power and political influence in other parts of the world. Since the end of WWII, the USSR and the United States became very hostile against one another, creating what came to be called “The Cold War“ coined by Bernard Baruch in 1947 from the lack of there ever being direct battles against one another. From the result of the bitter and cold rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union came a large chain of indirect battling over political influence in developing or war-torn countries. As this feud occurred the people of the United States mainly wanted there to be a change in Korea out of this war [Doc E], but what was occurring

Read More
1687 Words | 7 Pages

Korea’s history already determined it was a weak country, having been a pawn for Far Eastern powers, so Cold War had left it nearly destroyed with epidemics, poverty, limited education, and authoritarian rulers (LaFeber, 2008). In this state, Korea was left vulnerable to communism. In 1945, the 38th parallel marked the ally agreement of disarming the occupying Japanese military, however by the end of the Korean War, it would be the indivisible line that divided the country between communism and democracy (LaFeber, 2008). In June 1950, when North Korean troops passed the 38th parallel, President Truman gave the order for American air and naval units to move into action to aid South Korea and to show the United States’ opponents that “the United States was no longer content with mere “containment” but now aimed for liberation (LaFeber, 2008, p. 114). LaFeber (2008) explains President Truman’s intent, “

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

Showing that with this military operation to stop communism have cost them so much money and they are not gaining any grown over the North Korean military. In the end, the outcome of this war was not of any good, sated by (Campbell) " After three years of grinding destruction, both sides were forced to settle for essentially the status quo ante bellum". Meaning it was the same as it was when the war has not even started in several years ago. Making the Unites states think about reducing its military spending due to the fact that they have contributed so much money to something and it turned out the same as when it has started.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

President John F. Kennedy’s foreign policy consisted of showing our ruthlessness and our determination to win or beat anything that is thrown at us. On the other hand, President Lyndon B. Johnson’s foreign policy was destroyed with the Vietnam war. This war was inevitable, as it had be planned for the last the presidencies. For President Truman, and President Eisenhower had sent military advisers to help South Korea, and President Kennedy had sent more than 20,000 troops to South Korea. It would only be right for President Johnson to continue to long lived battle and bring it to an

Read More
279 Words | 2 Pages

American engaged war to provide aid to South Korea and help them fight off an attack by North Koreans. In contrast, North Korea opted to ignore the UN demand for withdrawal, the Security Council decided to help South Korea repel the invasion. (Stewart pg. 224) Nevertheless, General Douglas-Mac Arthur, the overseer of the post-WWW II, ordered the U.S. armed force to back off the North Koreans at Pusan.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

It was a logical, if not inevitable, outgrowth of a world view and a policy—the policy of containment” (Hopkins 4). This article contradicts Kissinger’s because it says that America entering the war was a well- thought out action rather than a “careless assessment of outcomes”. This error of judgement in escalating the conflict, although a factor, was not the main factor that caused America to fail. The main factor was that they used an overused policy of America, containment, to make their decisions. This policy was flawed from the beginning, as it views communism like a chain of dominos.

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

The United states helped aid allies and former enemies because of this. The Marshall plan was about being against or for any country. It was about being against poverty . It reveals that the United States weren’t just interested in being anti communist, but it reveal that freedom is more than just defeating communist. It was also about economic security

Read More
1788 Words | 8 Pages

After North Korea attacked South Korea Truman urged the American public to utilize U.S forces to go after, and dispose of, the threat of a communist South Korea, not only for containment but to appease his reputation. Truman’s containment led to the U.S involvement in the Korean War, making Truman’s reputation better, but this extension of containment could lead another war with North Korea in the

Read More
1796 Words | 8 Pages

Grace Fullenkamp Ms. Yane AP Lang March 14, 2018 The Korean War The Korean War was not a conflict in which the United States needed to be involved as to its horrific outcome is testament. Yet, in the 1950s, the U.S. thought it was believed that the only way to stop the spread of communism was to fight back against the potential formation of communist governments. When war broke out in Korea, it became a place for the United States to make a statement against communism on a global front joining with South Korea to combat the communist North.

Read More
153 Words | 1 Pages

Without the United States intervention in Korea, there would have been a spread and expansion of communism in Korea, and all over the

Read More
1711 Words | 7 Pages

Truman realized that fighting besides South Korea would enable the U.S to fight communism without being involved directly in a war with the

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

policy of containment had its first recognized use in the Korean War, where it was used by President Harry S. Truman to prevent a possible all-out war with China, Russia, and maybe even the world. You see, China had promised men and supplies to North Korea if they needed it. This meant that China would be fighting American forces which could lead to war not only with China, but also their ally, Russia, possibly sparking WWIII. When Truman asked MacArthur about this possibility, MacArthur shrugged it off. His predictions proved to be incorrect.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

The Korean War erupted in 25th of Jun 1950 by North Korea invade illegally in the early morning, in part, as a result of arbitrary political divisions that were put in place in the aftermath of World War II. The once-united country was split into political entities, entities that then split ideologically largely due to the influence of the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. While the blame that is to be placed for the situation that we have today in Korea rests in part with the outside world, Korean leaders themselves are responsible for most of the continuing problems. Despite where blame is fairly placed, however, the US remains an active player in the Korean situation. The thesis can be presented that, in part, continued US involvement with Korea is because a monster has been created and that monster is well outside the control of other world entities.

Read More

More about Us Policy Of Containment Dbq Essay

Open Document