ipl-logo

Us Response To Rwanda Case Study

1156 Words5 Pages

Case study: The US response to Rwanda
Introduction
The case represents a practical application of a pluralist approach. The aim is to see how this modus operandi can be applied to a real event and the consequences it caused in the international community. The US response to Rwanda is an interesting case narrating what happened when USA refused to intervene against a clear breach of Human Rights and the United Nations Convention on Genocide. Furthermore, this case raised both moral and normative issues that are not so easily solved. This case study was written by Cathinka Vik .

2.1 Humanitarian Intervention
Humanitarian Intervention is a mechanism meant to stop or prevent a breach of human rights in a state which is incapable or unwilling …show more content…

Therefore, the power is in the hands of the state leaders who are either permanent members or have been elected as members of the council . In 1994 when the Rwandan Genocide happened, Argentina, Czech Republic, Nigeria, Oman, and Rwanda were the elected members of the Council joining the permanent (The Popular Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America) . Firstly, we shall ask ourselves: It is realistic to expect a state leader to make moral decisions independently from their national interest when confronted with situations of severe Human Rights violations abroad …show more content…

Furthermore, they used their influence to “discourage a robust UN response” (Vik, 2015, p. 53). Conversely, US officials limited their actions to publicly condemn the actions of the Hutu government and, in late July, to bring humanitarian relief to those affected by the genocide . The Clinton administration, who was in charge at the time, justified this inaction using two main arguments.
Firstly, the US had already sustained too many casualties in Somalia. Indeed, the battle of Mogadishu resulted in a disastrous military operation that led to the failure of the US mission in Somalia .
Secondly, the Clinton administration had narrowly defined national interests and minimum engagement in international humanitarian situations which was incompatible with the international commitments the USA had with their international partners. Therefore, it can be inferred that the Clinton administrations adopted a pluralist policy that privileged their national interests over the international commitments of the USA . 2.3.2 The Pluralist position of the

Show More
Related

Summary Of Julia Alvarez's In The Time Of The Butterflies

773 Words | 4 Pages

The USA has a lengthy history of foreign intervention, staged when it is convenient for them rather than for the benefit of the country being converged upon. Regimes and dictatorships breed with practiced ease in developing—or even recovering—countries, directly under the nose of the world’s most powerful nations. Specifically in the US, foreign intervention should not be implemented for they have proven their incapability to assist nation without taking advantageous liberties. Frequently armed with selfish notions, America intervenes in foreign affairs—to garner some sort of profit—before withdrawing from the unfinished conflict entirely. By reading political declarations and historical recounts of these dictatorships it can be confidently

Read More

Effects Of Imperialism In Rwanda

1889 Words | 8 Pages

“An in-depth analysis on effects of Imperialism on Rwanda” Nowadays, European countries such as England, France, Germany, Belgium, and many other countries possess a colossal clout throughout the world. It is an impeccable fact that such countries, indeed, have served as a rudiment pivot and step for the world to be advanced to the point where we are since the Industrial Revolution. Such countries, because of it, without a doubt, have a crucial status globally and become the superpower and commercial hub on our planet. On the back side of their gleaming growth, however, there is an invisible part left behind their luminous development: the Imperialism. The term “Imperialism” refers to a policy of extending a country’s authority and political clout by using its military forces and diplomacy.

Read More

Summary Of A Problem From Hell: America And The Age Of Genocide

1189 Words | 5 Pages

During the events leading up to the killings in Rwanda the United States government exercised caution in becoming involved. Powers states, “The president could have deployed U.S. troops…” (154) once the killing of thousands of Rwandan citizens had begun regardless of congressional opposition, through the War Powers Act of 1973. Which states, the president has the power to send troops abroad for 60 days without congressional consent, and then after denial has 30 days to bring them back. The author feels that the president should have shown more initiative considering the country’s history of a strong presence and involvement around the world. Aside from sending military troops, the government had plenty of other options.

Read More

Rwanda Genocide Response

635 Words | 3 Pages

The American Government 's Response to The Rwandan Genocide The United States often have an had interest in the political, social and civil crises of other countries in order to benefit themselves. American senior officials hid the truth of the Rwanda Genocide to avoid public moral obligation. The government did not give any financial or political support to the country because Rwanda did not offer minerals or political advantages and stability; the US ' government did not want to be involved in another conflict, even though it has helped other countries in the past.1 But what is truly deeper hidden, are the stories of people like Immacule, a young girl, who, unlike thousands of others, survived the catastrophic genocide in Rwanda.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of US President Donald Trump

1206 Words | 5 Pages

That US presidents who paid lip-service to a moral dimension in international relations did so to camouflage militarism behind the facade of consensus. And that US national interests always positioned the global moral goalpost and not the other way around. Put another way, Washington after 1945 reprogrammed the free world’s superego to mirror its priorities with scant accommodation for competing voices. Hence its 2003 military misadventure in Iraq that should have been roundly condemned by the highest international forum of the UN was instead given legal

Read More

The Role Of Us Involvement In The Vietnam War Essay

424 Words | 2 Pages

Some believe the United States is responsible to stop the war and suffering in foreign counties. Others think the U.S. should avoid foreign situations unless they threaten the homeland. Either way, the morale and physical responsibilities fall in the hands of the government (Relin, 1990). The U.S. has a long history of intervening in faraway conflicts that pose no immediate threat to American

Read More

Operation Restore Hope

790 Words | 4 Pages

A peacekeeping mission gone wrong. Operation Restore Hope in Somalia quickly became a deadly battle. The United States made the decision to aid the United Nations in a mission to bring food to the Somali citizens. The Somali government used their money for weapons, and not for food for their citizens. When the United Nations started bringing food to Somalia, the Somali government didn’t want them to, and they started conflict.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The International Criminal Tribunal Of Rwanda

152 Words | 1 Pages

The International criminal tribunal of Rwanda has made contributions to international justice and to establishing accountability for the suffering of many Rwandan people. Since many countries are unwilling to try their former national leaders for claimed violations of human rights or international humanitarian law, often formally or informally granting amnesty in hopes that ignoring past violence will promote reconciliation, victims have turned increasingly to other countries to press their cases. In conclusion, both the international community and the Rwandan government have placed in prosecutions as a means of fighting impunity and promoting the rule of law, and the ICTR has been attack by severe problems that have slowed its progress, The

Read More

Would The World Be Better Without The USmmary

1384 Words | 6 Pages

He emphasizes that “the rights of minorities and indigenous peoples as well as the prevention of torture and genocide figure in many UN job descriptions. Because their mandates put human values ahead of economic concerns and efficiency, they often clash with the interests of governments and markets, and they call for more political and financial support that governments are prepared to provide (32).” The debate over the amount of support each nation should and is obligated to put into these efforts have to lead to many disagreements and

Read More

Film Analysis: Hotel Rwanda Genocide

896 Words | 4 Pages

While a variety of choices culminated in the 1994 genocide, the Clinton administration, when confronted by the facts, chose not to stop the fight (Kohen 1). In class, we discuss that genocide is defined as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or part, a national, ethical, racial or religious group. Written by Nicole Winfield of the Online Global Policy, the United Nations released a report assessing United Nation’s involvement in Rwanda. The release said the UN and its member states failed Rwanda in deplorable ways in 1994, ignoring evidence that a genocide was planned, refusing to act once it was underway and finally abandoning the Rwandan people when they most needed protection (Winfield 1). In Hotel Rwanda, I believe that racism played a role in the international community’s failure to act to stop the genocide, as the UN colonel says.

Read More

Genocide Vs War

1178 Words | 5 Pages

In the UNSC’s article 51, individual and collective self-defense can be authorized by the UNSC under the framework of collective security. However, genocide is never justifiable in the eyes of the UN. Perhaps the most distinguishing feature between war and genocide is the disproportionally ability of those involved to fight back. Within war there is a certain level of understanding that those engaging in the conflict will have an ability to engage in battle. However, historically in genocides the effected groups have had little to no ability to proportionately fight against their attackers.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of UN Peacekeeping

1479 Words | 6 Pages

There have been multiple instances of mass casualties due to the UN peacekeeper’s defensive rules of engagement. Supporters of offensive operations look to past instances where the the defensive practices of the UN peacekeepers have led to mass death. In 1994, 2000 Rwandans died in Rwanda as a result of the 90 Belgian peacekeepers not being allowed to engage the approaching militant group, the Hutus. The UN command avoided engaging even though they knew that the Hutus were planning a genocide on the rwandan people. They instructed them to instead, aid foreigners to local airports resulting in mass killings.

Read More

Humanitarian Intervention Essay

1610 Words | 7 Pages

Since 19th Century Humanitarian Intervention has been included as a subject of Public International Law. The basis of such intervention in the internal affairs of a Sovereign State is supposed to be moral not political. This study will comprise of critical analysis about the legal and moral justifications given by the intervening State and the justification of the role of United Nations, especially Security Council. This will further examine the impacts of those interventions on the implementation of Human Rights, International Politics, as well as on Public International Law. This study will further focus on the legal or moral justification of Humanitarian Interventions by USA and its impact on the world politics.

Read More

The Benefits Of Humanitarian Intervention

1020 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction Humanitarian intervention is a hard topic to discuss considering the fact that the global community is constructed on the ideas or principles of sovereignty, non-intervention, and the non-use of force. After a mass loss of human lives in the Second and First World War, the society of states has launched laws that prohibit genocides, dismissal of the ill-treatment of the civilian people and establishing basic human rights. There is a conflict between the ideology of sovereignty and non-intervention. State sovereignty is something very important because, as the meaning of the term “sovereignty”, states are supported to be the guardian angels of their citizens’ security. Although this does not happen as expected, instead of some states

Read More

What Is Human Rights Violation?

1620 Words | 7 Pages

And, in case of human rights violations, attention often means pressure, and, consequently, progress. To conclude, both theoretical principles and practical application of the concept backs the UN human rights debate on country-specific issues. Firstly, it is a right thing to do because the UN has to supervise that its member states will honor their commitments to their citizens and their wellbeing. Secondly, this concrete discourse has real impact on the state in question, creating pressure on the governments to behave in compliance with the international human rights law by resulting in action taken by both the UN and the public.

Read More

More about Us Response To Rwanda Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document