More handpicked essays just for you.
History essay February 1917 revolution in Russia
Russian revolution in 1917
Account for the role of lenin during the Russian revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History essay February 1917 revolution in Russia
Post WWl, Russia was still not industrialized, suffering economically and politically and in no doubt in need of a leader after Lenin’s death. “His successor, Joseph Stalin, a ruthless dictator, seized power and turned Russia into a totalitarian state where the government controls all aspects of private and public life.” Stalin showed these traits by using methods of enforcement, state control of individuals and state control of society. The journey of Stalin begins now.
Revolutionists explanation of October Revolution is based on the importance of the force of the masses which created the revolutionary nature of the society leading to cardinal reforms. Lenin was indeed a key figure and the Bolshevik party was able to meet the demand of the masses which raised their popularity. This view shows a direct conflict between a revolutionist and liberal ‘totalitarian’ schools that implements Lenin and Stalin as the only people that caused terror and emplaced control over
One man, Vladimir Lenin saw that Russia was spiraling downwards, having lost two battles in a row and having the highest death count out of all the European countries he saw that a change was needed. Lenin was the leader of the Bolsheviks who were a communist group that wanted to draw out of the war and over thrown Czar Nicholas II. Preaching peace, and food he wanted, ¨the offer of peace, the salvation of Petrograd, salvation from famine, and the transfer of land to the peasants who depended on them,¨ (Document 8). People were drawn into this and, ¨increasingly taken in by the propagandists of the united Socialist Party and their internationalis ideas,¨ (Document 9). This combined with high death rates, starvation, communist ideals started the overthrow of Russia and the end of the war.
During the Russian Revolution, Lenin was the first Marxist leader of Russia from 1917-1924. For him, democracy was a form of the State, and in turn, a form of oppression. He believed that democracy was a way to make the people of Russia compliant. He saw Parliament as mask for the government, and that officials would make it seem like they were doing good for the public but end up going behind closed doors to make official changes in their favor. This is something he wanted to change.
This had created an opposition among us fellow Bolsheviks. Lenin did not trust the masses to make a revolution he felt they were only capable of a trade union consciousness. He had favoured a dictatorship of the Bolshevik party over the working class. He had begun to not trust us rank and files of the Bolshevik party workers. Lenin had begun to get his ideas out with a newspaper called Pravda, I personally enjoyed reading his paper and it had become at once in his hands a powerful instrument to overthrow of bourgeois society.
The author gives a lot of good arguments regarding his position of the Russian Revolution. Figes first shows that, whatever the hypotheses of counterfactual history might be, practically speaking the tsarist framework was bound by its defects. The disappointment of the 1905 Revolution did not pick up tsarism much time, and regardless Nicholas II attacked his most able pastor, Stolypin; and even his reforms; also how the 1914 war might at first have put off such an upheaval, yet from there it quickened it. The thought that tsarist Russia was making a course for a thriving liberal free enterprise, and was redirected just by the war, is a dream as the author well mentions. The author also, has made a critical contribution to our comprehension
1917 was an extremely volatile year for Russia, during which two complete revolutions of government took place within the space of eight months, and a formerly staunch and inflexible hereditary empire of over two hundred years was completely dismantled. The Russian Empire of the Romanovs was one of the largest in the history of the world, and experienced the implementation of one of the most sophisticated systems of government and civil service, one of the fastest and most far-reaching expansions of national infrastructure, and one of the most feared military forces of the time. Yet by the time of the outbreak of the Russian revolution in February of 1917, the idea of uprising had seemed rather obvious to those both inside and outside of Russia’s
In return of his unplanned death, Joseph Stalin, the former Secretary of State was put in power. It was not until later that Stalin would get his country involved in world war, at first he did an economically great thing; politically though, was terrifying. Stalin had two main focused for his rule of the country. First, was the Collectivization of Agriculture and the Second was Rapid Industrialization. His main focus, although the previous two, was to wipe the capitalism and socialism that Lenin’s
Following Lenin’s death the enormous difficulties involved in trying to build socialism in a very underdeveloped country, encircled by imperialism, led to struggles in the party and then to backward steps. Soviet leader Joseph Stalin purged Bolshevik opponents while making concessions to careerists and increasing inequality. Nevertheless, at the same time
In discussing the statement, ‘Lenin had the biggest impact on Russia between the years 1861-1941’, it is important to consider the other people who had a significant impact on Russian history during that time. This is likely to include such influential leaders such as Nicholas II, Alexander II, Joseph Stalin, Leon Trotsky and even Karl Marx. In reality, the two individual who had the greatest influence on Russia during the period 1861 - 1941 were Joseph Stalin and Vladimir Lenin. I have therefore chosen to focus on these two individuals and compare and contrast their impact on Russian
Andre Abi Haidar PSPA 210 INTRODUCTION It is always difficult to write about and discuss Karl Marx, or more importantly the applications of Marx’s theories, due to the fact that he inspired and gave rise to many movements and revolutionaries, not all of which follow his theories to the point. Although Marx tends to be equated with Communism, it might not seem righteous to blame him for whatever shortcomings occurred when his theories were put to the test; Marx passed away well before the revolution in Russia, and he played no role in the emergence of the totalitarian regime at the time. When discussing Marx, however, Vladimir Lenin is one of the biggest highlights when it comes to studying the outcomes of Marx’s theories.
On April 7, the Bolshevik newspaper Pravda published the ideas contained in Lenin’s speeches, which collectively came to be known as the April Theses. From the moment of his return through late October 1917, Lenin worked for a single goal: to place Russia under Bolshevik control as quickly as possible. The immediate effect of Lenin’s attitude, however, was to alienate most other prominent Socialists in the city. Members of the Petrograd Soviet, and even many members of Lenin’s own party, wrote Lenin off as an anarchist quack who was too radical to be taken seriously. “All Power to the Soviets”
In the midst of the chaos, Lenin managed to gain the attention of the delegates and delivered his manifesto, “To All Workers, Soldiers, and Peasants.” This manifesto supported the uprising in Petrograd and transferred power to the congress and all local soviets throughout Russia. It also called for the proposal of peace in the war, support of soldier’s rights, a program to completely democratize the army, the transferring of land to the peasantry, and the right of self-determination in Russia. By the end of the congress, Lenin’s manifesto was approved (Rabinowitch 10-12). Despite Lenin’s manifesto clearly stating that the power should belong to the soviets, he had wanted
I am an achievement-oriented professional with the 12+ years of extensive background in higher education, nonprofit, healthcare, and pharmaceutical industries. U of I is my Alma Mater. With great pride and gratitude, I called Urbana-Champaign as my home for over 15 years. The community played an important role every achievement I experience today. When a friend recommended me to apply for the iMBA program, I immediately started the application.
Karl Marx (1818-1883) considered himself not to be a sociologist but a political activist. However, many would disagree and in the view of Hughes (1986), he was ‘both – and a philosopher, historian, economist, and a political scientist as well.’ Much of the work of Marx was political and economic but his main focus was on class conflict and how this led to the rise of capitalism. While nowadays, when people hear the word “communism”, they think of the dictatorial rule of Stalin and the horrific stories of life in a communist state such as the Soviet Union, it is important not to accuse Marx of the deeds carried out in his name.
