ipl-logo

Russian Revolution Social Impact Essay

870 Words4 Pages

An impact is defined in the dictionary as something that has ‘a marked effect or influence’ ; this can be understood to occur on almost anything from a country to a single person. In assessing the impact a person has made, for example on a country, it can be considered under three main headings; social, economic and political. Social Social impact is the effect an activity has on a surrounding community (including individuals and families) , for example the emancipation of the serfs under Alexander II. In this era, social impact is very important, as this was one of the main turning points in the 100-year period; social policy was one of the key tools for remaining in power as peasants began to fight for their rights and more freedom. Economic …show more content…

It is often described as just being another word for the importance of a situation however it can also encompass the negative or positive impact that the event or person has. In this essay both the impact and the significance of an individual are going to be explored to answer the question posed. For example, whilst Tsar Nicholas II was significant in the fact that his shortcomings and mishandling of a difficult situation led to the abolishment of the Tsars and the Russian Revolution, he, as a person had very little impact in anything that happened to the country. For example, he imposed very few policies and the ones that were introduced were often not enforced or executed properly. In discussing the statement, ‘Lenin had the biggest impact on Russia between the years 1861-1941’, it is important to consider the other people who had a significant impact on Russian history during that time. This is likely to include such influential leaders such as Nicholas II, Alexander II, Joseph Stalin, Leon Trotsky and even Karl Marx. In reality, the two individual who had the greatest influence on Russia during the period 1861 - 1941 were Joseph Stalin and Vladimir Lenin. I have therefore chosen to focus on these two individuals and compare and contrast their impact on Russian

Show More
Related
474 Words | 2 Pages

their economic

Read More
303 Words | 2 Pages

Introduction The Russian had problems with different things like nicholas the second and how weak the leadership is and the starvation of civilians and this caused the revolution of russia and this changed russia. Russia was a vast multinational placed that was controlled by romanov. Body Paragraph One Nicholas the second was one of the problems i think because he made all the laws and policies when he also took control russia was behind on industrial product so he made more industrial product and that increased the urban poor but people in russia still lived on farms. The urban poor worked in factories and they worked for long hours with little pay and the conditions weren't so great.

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

Millions of people in Russia during World War 1 were starving or killed. To make matters even worse, the Russian government was falling apart. Riots started to break out in Russia to end the war. Finally in 1918 the war ended which brought remorse to the people of Russia, however it did not last long. Right after World War 1 the October Revolution took place in Russia to allow the “Bolsheviks-the communists-to power over all other possible parties”(28).

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

Napoleon had a social and political impact because he improved France’s government but also utilized imperialism which harmed multiple other countries. Napoleon Bonaparte had a political impact because his government accepted all people from any previous social class and he took power over countries going back on his peace treaties. Napoleon had a political impact by giving government jobs to anyone, meaning the average person had an equal opportunity to an important job. After staging a coup with other French Rebels, Napoleon crowned himself Emperor as well as First Consul, which is an executive position giving him control over France. “As first consul, Napoleon created a government open to talent where former nobles, old regime officials,

Read More
415 Words | 2 Pages

Individuals were key to driving change, though often because of the influence of other factors. Tsar Alexander II instigated one of the biggest changes in Russian society: the Emancipation of the Serfs. Prior to this one third of the Russian population were serfs, thus the Emancipation changed Russian society completely. Lynch argues that Alexander’s training “from an early age” for government instilled in him that autocracy must continue, and Kochan writes that Alexander was “The best prepared heir the Russian throne ever had” . Therefore, both suggest that Alexander’s education and personal aim of protecting Tsardom was key to the Emancipation .

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Ineffective reforms and the limited political participation by the population contributed to grievances felt by society. Furthermore, the poor economic conditions exacerbated by the demands of war highlighted Russia’s failure to industrialise resulting in mass inflation and poverty. Russia was industrialising quickly and cheaply, worsening the working conditions. Russia’s

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

Stalin’s iron fist totalitarian leadership is often viewed with negative connotations by historians today, although many of his policies advanced the Soviet Union at a rapid rate to become the United State’s primary competition in the years following his death. The use of five year plans by Stalin caused for many people to parish due to the all or nothing mentality put forward by him, causing for the U.S.S.R’s achievements to be reviewed in the future by historians as ruthless and questioned if the brutality used by Stalin was necessary. During his reign as leader, Stalin caused for the people of rural Russia to live lives filled with famine and immense abuse when they failed to hit quotas set out by the government in an effort to feed the

Read More
1017 Words | 5 Pages

“ What challenges and/or difficulties did the tsarist government of russia face and why did the russian citizens want to end the Tsar's Autocratic government?” Is the question I will be discussing within this Argumentative Essay about the Russian revolution of the year 1917. The Russian revolution was ongoing during the end of World War I and was the cause of one of the first countries that replaced its monarch state and began a Communist state. During the Russian revolution a rebellion under the name of Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin started to remove the Tsar Nicholas II out of power and to put an end to the tsar government.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

The novel, Ivan journey in the Russian revolution was influenced with power and authority. Social issues played an important role. We see Ivan as a middle class individual, but in reality, as the author emphasized, it seems he was miserable being a part of the middle class. He was not very influential because he did not make much money, however, he was still ambitious and materialistic and had dreams of becoming wealthy.

Read More
1929 Words | 8 Pages

In return of his unplanned death, Joseph Stalin, the former Secretary of State was put in power. It was not until later that Stalin would get his country involved in world war, at first he did an economically great thing; politically though, was terrifying. Stalin had two main focused for his rule of the country. First, was the Collectivization of Agriculture and the Second was Rapid Industrialization. His main focus, although the previous two, was to wipe the capitalism and socialism that Lenin’s

Read More
1154 Words | 5 Pages

The weak leadership of Tsar Nicholas II was the defining factor of the outbreak of the February/March 1917 Russian Revolution. What follows is an explanation of the complex set of circumstances, which were exacerbated by the weak leadership of Nicholas II, ultimately leading to his abdication in February 1917. “Nicholas II was an absolute monarch who could appoint and dismiss ministers at will, determine policy, and in wartime, command the Armed Forces” (MacMillan, 2014, p.196). As a child, Nicholas II was taught by an arch-conservative, Pobedonostsev, who loathed any kind of liberalism and democracy (Lynch and Woodland, 2008 p.12). The ideologies preached by Pobedonostsev, were concepts that Nicholas II would take to heart, as can be clearly seen in his subsequent policies.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

Karl Marx’s works have not only inspired the reason for the Russian Revolution, but

Read More
290 Words | 2 Pages

This essay proposes to discuss the most reliable source on the causes of the Russian Revolution. Sources include the film Anastasia (1997), film October: Ten Days That Shook the World (1927), and a police report (1916). I am undeniable that the police report is the most trustworthy out of all sources. Evidence proves that the films are considered unreliable. Film October: Ten Days That Shook the World includes the storming of the Winter palace as an event distorted by myth.

Read More
179 Words | 1 Pages

The February and October Revolutions of 1917 produced a world that would be governed by Marxism and set the stage for an armed struggle that would shape the second half of the Twentieth Century. In the traditional telling of the history, the working class people rose up to remove the shackles that had kept them oppressed by the capitalists and the monarchy. However, Richard Pipes with the benefit of access to classified records contends that the Revolution came about because of a series of accidents that would alter the world and produce catastrophic results for the Twentieth Century. In his book, Pipes presents three why question of the Revolution and goes into each one individually. The Three Why’s of the Russian Revolution are; why did the

Read More
1606 Words | 7 Pages

The Russian revolution technically consisted of two revolutions, the so called “January revolution” and the “October revolution”, that both took place in 1917. They came to change Russia not only politically but socially as well. The ruler of Russia, tsar Nicholaj II, was an autocratic dictator who did not want anyone else to rule. He kept poor track of his country and lived in solitude far away from the people.

Read More

More about Russian Revolution Social Impact Essay

Open Document