ipl-logo

War Crime Trials During Ww2

631 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Research paper of the nuremberg trials

War Crime Trials.

The war crime trials were very important to the history of our nation and the world. During WWII, The allied nations gave justice to the nazi party for all the hurt, pain, and suffering they gave to the world. These trials not only were the first time the world came together but these also changed the world as well. This trial is what we look back on. So these trials gave peace to all the families that had lost their loved ones during the war. Starting in 1945, The trials had begun. Between 1945 and 1946, 24 of Nazi Germany were tried for a variety of reasons. Due to the evidence brought to the table, there was a lot of it. During the trial, the Tribunal—and the world—learned about the Nazi Party and its "planning, initiating and waging of aggressive war" from the beginning. Footage of Nazi concentration camps taken by Allied military photographers during liberation was shown to the court. The graphic scenes of what had taken place in Europe were the most powerful evidence presented at the trial. Other memorable moments of the trial were the screenings of the Nazi Concentration and Prison Camps and The Nazi Plan films, the detailed description of the Final Solution, the murders of prisoners of war, atrocities in extermination camps, and countless cruel acts to persecute Jews. (Info copied from The …show more content…

The trials uncovered the German leadership that supported the Nazi dictatorship. Of the 177 defendants, 24 were sentenced to death, 20 to lifelong imprisonment, and 98 other prison sentences. Twenty five defendants were found not guilty. Many of the prisoners were released early in the 1950s as a result of pardons. Thirteen of the 24 death sentences were executed. (Info copied from The Nuremberg Trials https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/topics/nuremberg-trials Author: The WWII

Show More
Related
579 Words | 3 Pages

On November 14, 1945, the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials began in Germany. They were to be the definitive judgement of the crimes against humanity by the Nazis. In the midst of the trial, it was determined that the SS, along with its associated organizations such as the Sicherheitsdienst (SD--the security and intelligence organization within the SS) and Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo—State Secret Police), was a criminal organization.1 The verdict placed on the SS was as follows:

Read More
157 Words | 1 Pages

The trial ended in 1937. Judge A. E. Hawkins sentenced, Clarence Norris, Charlie Weems, Haywood Patterson, Olen Montgomery, Ozie Powell, Willie Roberson, Eugene Williams, and Andy Wright to death. They all

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

The punishments were not recorded or even bad to the point that it needed any attorneys to help the soldiers. These soldiers got an offer of not committing murder, and even if they refused to disobey the order, there were no punishments or dead threats. There was also another belief that the killers were all “innocent” people who did not know any better because of the propagandas and teachings that the Nazi put in their

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

¨ When the ¨final solution¨- Hitler´s plan to kill all Jews in Europe- was put into effect in 1941.¨ (www.nationalarchives.gov.uk). Hitler used to keep his opponents locked away without a fair trial. ¨ Bergen-Belsen´s most famous prisoners- Anne Frank and her older sister Margot- lived in the tent camp. (www.library.gatech.edu).

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

The trial covered the three main factors of denying the Holocaust. The biggest accusations claim was that there was no proof of the Nazi’s having an organized plan to eliminate Jews, that there was no proof that Hitler ordered the extermination or did not know of the extermination of Jews, and that no Jews were killed with the use of gas chambers. He believed specifically that no Jew was ever murdered by gassing at the Auschwitz extermination camp. The trial began in January of 2000 and ended, with a judgment strongly in favor of Lipstadt and her publisher, in April of that year. The purpose of the trial was for Irving to gain his credibility back.

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

The Investigation is a dramatic documentary of the Frankfurt War Crimes trials during the 1960s based on actual evidence from the trial. Weiss strips the trial down to its most essential features and converts it into a powerful play. It consists of extracted testimonies from numerous witnesses and defendants, including moments of examinations and cross-examinations conducted by the prosecutors and defense counsel. The nine unnamed witnesses represent the millions of individuals affected by the Holocaust. They were brought forth to testify to the barbarity of Auschwitz.

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

The Salem Witch Trials and The Holocaust are two past events that are commonly known and remembered today for the prosecution of many innocent deaths. These two took place in different areas as well as different time periods but are still comparable in numerous ways with the death tolls, the people who took leadership, and the way it affects history today for example. The Holocaust is known for the five to six million jews that were burned, shot, hung, or even experimented on (www.history.com). Several different individuals were punished for unique characteristics (Wiesel,).

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

In the comparison of a revolutionary bloodshed, The Trials had sentimental background attached to those

Read More
350 Words | 2 Pages

Lastly, the Nuremberg trials was one of the biggest events to occur toward Albert Speer. It is because of his work with the Nazi Party and his contribution to the outcome of war, was he being held accountable for his actions. However, through devious remarks and claims that he was unaware of such actions being taken place under his authority, he was sentenced to a lighter penalty than what his fellow collages. Speer was held accountable for four crimes; including the common plan or conspiracy to accomplish… a war aggression, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. However, out of the four crimes, ‘war crimes’ and ‘crimes against humanity’ were the two that would have been the biggest concern for Speer.

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

The most infamous of these camps was Auschwitz, which was responsible for the deaths of over one million people. The Holocaust ended in 1945 with the defeat of Nazi Germany by the Allies. The scale of the atrocity shocked the world, and efforts were made to bring the perpetrators to justice. The Nuremberg Trials were held in 1945-1946, where Nazi leaders were prosecuted for war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against

Read More
1424 Words | 6 Pages

Their heavily publicized trial captured the interest and fears of the nation. Though their involvement is still argued today, the Rosenbergs were both sentenced to death for their alleged involvement for espionage. If you were to ask the children of the Rosenbergs today, they would tell you that their father was most definitely a culprit behind the stealing of nuclear secrets, but their mother was innocent and only used as an leverage to coax the most wanted confession from their complicit

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

Although millions were murdered during the Holocaust, many war criminals were brought to trial and convicted for their crimes (Nuremburg Trials). The Nuremberg trials were a series of thirteen trials carried in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 and 1949.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

This was just the beginning of the trials. These trials alone resulted in two hundred people accused and placed before the

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

The Impact of the Nuremberg Trials Noah Matt Albia High School English 10 Mrs. Lawson 29 March 2023 Title The Holocaust was one of the most decisive times in human history, but oftentimes its aftermath is severely overshadowed. The Nuremberg trials permanently altered the course of global history, and international law.

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

“Splendid, one of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford. Prepare for another, even more dangerous game with even consequences,” Zaroff remarked. “Well I would not fancy that, but I can listen to your request, General Zaroff,” and Rainsford tensed up after what is seen protruding from Zaroff’s pocket.

Read More

More about War Crime Trials During Ww2

Related Topics

Open Document