Charlemagne, King of the Franks, King of the Lombards, and Emperor of Rome, did not achieve these positions just with luck. He worked hard to dominate his kingdom and gain respect from the people. How did Charlemagne become such a powerful figure during the 7th and 8th century? Many contributing factors played a role to his success including the work that his father and grandfather did in order to unite the kingdom and pass it down to Charlemagne, working with the Catholic Church, and conquering land through quite a few wars and campaigns. There are also certain characteristics
The word “great” as defined by the Webster’s Universal College dictionary means notable and remarkable. The term great is most commonly used to describe Charlemagne the great and Constantine the great. These people did not earn this title based on who their family was. They earned it. Whether they were a conquer or an amazing king, these people are forever known in history.
Charlemagne, Charles the Great or King of the Franks (768-814 CE) either name he was a great King according to Einhard. Einhard believed Charlemagne was the ideal king because he thought “He had all the characteristics he felt would make a good king “(Shah). The Life of Charlemagne was written after Charlemagne’s death. Einhard wrote this book in tribute to his friend and King Charlemagne.
One of the most successful and the greatest of all history was Alexander the Great. Very brilliant, patient and never gone to war without planning it first. Alexander took lots of risk and sacrifice. During his time in history, he fought off the Persians and Greek, conquered Egypt and Asia Minor, and secured the Mediterranean Sea. Alexander was so important to history, he did so much things in history.
lfred’s brother was the king until he died in a battle between the Danes. Alfred had an important job. He was now ruling the only kingdom of the Anglo-Saxons. He had a great responsibility laying on his shoulders, because he would be the only hope for Wessex and also for the neighboring countries that were conquered by the Danes. He now had to overcome the mightiest force and its king, Guthrum.
Charlemagne gave Carolingians a cultural reform by bringing unity in Western Empire. He brought stability in Europe and united France that made him the “Patron of Rome, Guardian of Roman church, and defender of the faith.” Both Alexander the Great and Charlemagne brought change to their country and honor to their countrymen. But it was the demonstration of their military superiority and skillful tactics and strategies that one of them truly deserve the title of “the Great.” Alexander’s leadership skills became apparent when he defeated the Maedi when he was only sixteen.
Alfred was born at Wantage in Oxfordshire in 849, fourth or fifth son of Aethelwulf , king of Wessex, a Saxon kingdom in southwestern England. In 853, Alfred went to Rome, where he was received by Pope Leo IV. According to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, Alfred was anointed a king. Victorian scholars interpreted this as an anticipatory coronation. On the other hand, his succession could not have been predicted at the time, as Alfred had three living senior siblings.
Overall, people would agree that Herod was truly a genius in architecture and politics. Additionally, he constructed a port (at Caesarea Maritima) and a fortress (at Masada and Herodium). Herod also brought his kingdom prosperity by stabilizing the economy and reducing the taxes. The aftermath of building the port city of Caesarea was an encouragement in trade. Overall, this would give Herod the title for Great but there were other areas in his life that were
Alexander the Great earned his name by being one of the greatest kings. He changes the wars and conquered many great militaries. Alexander the Great was only twenty years old when he took the thrown but was at the same time brilliant in what he accomplished. He united the city-states of Greece. The people gave him the name Alexander the Great for doing so.
• Alexander the Great was the best orator and a great commanding officer. He won multiple wars whether they were in Asia or at the sea while suppressing revolts from his conquered lands. On the other hand, Constantine the Great was the first Emperor to establish Christianity during his reign in Rome that shifted Western history. Both leaders were termed “Great” because of their own achievement. They had different set of ways in winning wars, improving Ancient Greek and Ancient Rome, and proving peace and prosperity.
Justinian, for example, had numerous construction projects, was a powerful military leader, and had a strong legal system. Justinian's building projects, for example, are one of the reasons he was an outstanding leader. Justinian, first off, was Christian. And that meant many of his people converted
He sacrificed himself when killing the dragon that had frightened almost everyone but Beowulf. Some may have seen him as a proud fool but he should be proud considering he was risking his life for others in dangerous situations. Ergo, he was a hero and was still looked up to even after his
His courage and strength exceed all human men. Beowulf came willingly to help the Danes which was highly unusual in a time of war (Fisher). He set a moral example for human beings spreading the need of friendship. Beowulf was most definitely the ideal Anglo-Saxon warrior as an epic hero of epic proportions (GÓMEZ-CALDERÓN). Gilgamesh was destined to greatness from birth.
There have been many important leaders in history. Many have done great things and many have done not so great things. One of the most important leaders in history was Alexander the Great. His real name is just Alexander but where does the “Great” come from? There is reason to why Alexander is rather great than not great.
Beowulf possessed the poised demeanor necessary to defeat all evils by the arrogant swing of his sword. The commitment shown by lending his life to the welfare of his people was imperative in order to be called a flawless warrior. Beowulf embodied the determination that Anglo-Saxons saw as unmeasurably valuable. If nothing more than just fiction, Beowulf is the ideal hero of the people from who he originated. “They said that of all the kings upon the earth he was the man most gracious and fair-minded, kindest to his people and keenest to win fame.”
