Was Gandhi Revolutionary
Mahatma Gandhi was a civil rights leader. Gandhi is credited with freeing India from British rule. Gandhi was born on October 2, 1869. He studied in London to become a lawyer and went to South Africa to practice law. While he was in South Africa he began to congregate with the Indian population and held silent strikes against social injustices (Biography.com).
There have been many people that have had major contributions to the world. Toussaint L'Ouverture and Mohandas Gandhi were some people that both had a large impact to their respective regions. In the case of Toussaint L'Ouverture he was a Haitian slave from the country of Haiti. He escaped in a sudden slave revolt. He was educated by his godfather Pierre Baptiste.
Could anyone be freed from the mighty British Empire? In the early 1900s, a new movement was starting in India which wanted to do just this, however through non-violence. Although non-violence was unheard of in the Western World this belief in India attracted everyone regardless of sex or religion. At the center of this movement, Mohandas Gandhi, a British educated lawyer, campaigned for non-violence through passive resistance. Passive Resistance was a means of disobedience through non-violence.
The term “Revolutionary” is an instantaneous change or shift that promotes equal rights, liberty, and freedom. So, while some may argue that the revolution was a turning point for America, The American revolution in this case is not revolutionary since slavery was still present, minority groups did not gain rights, and British ideals and tactics were still being used in the new government. One of the crucial pieces of evidence that this “revolution” could not be considered revolutionary is because of the slavery still taking place even after the war ended. Throughout the revolt against British rule in the 16th century, the American people fought under the banner of truth, justice, and liberty for all people, However, the only people that indeed
Both Civil Disobedience and the Gandhi article are alike based on the fact they both discuss civil disobedience, attending prison, and standing for one’s beliefs. Civil disobedience can be seen as a good thing and a bad thing depending on to what extent one is breaking the laws. Some people may break the law because they feel that it is unfair to them but others break the for the simple fact of doing what they want in order for it to benefit themselves. Laws are meant for the majority which means even if they are not pertaining to certain citizens. Thoreau targeted laws that pertained to him, Gandhi went on strike for the better of his country and people.
Was the American Revolution really Revolutionary? The American Revolution began in 1775 and ended in 1789 with the result of the Constitution being ratified. A revolution is a forcible overthrow of a government or a social order in favor of a new system. The American Revolution was revolutionary because rebellion was included by the angry citizens despising British rule, economics, and a change in politics.
How revolutionary was the revolution? Based on the information in the 10 documents I believe that the revolution was not very revolutionary. The word revolutionary means involving or causing a dramatic change. I strongly believe that the revolution was not very revolutionary because the changes it made were not very dramatic or strong and a lot of the things from that time stayed the same after the war ended.
Accordingly the Revolution could be viewed as an attempt to
Was the American Revolution revolutionary? Most would say yes, but there are some who question how truly revolutionary it was. In A Young People’s History of the United States in chapter 5 Howard Zinn states, “Much of the property taken from loyalists went to enrich the Revolutionary leaders and friends.” In other words, during the war much of the poor working men and women’s land was taken and given to the wealthy to make them even more powerful.
In my opinion the Revolution was not radical for women. Despite the fact that the men in the colonies were fighting for the rights of everyone is one of the hypocritical statements that could have been made. It is clear that the Men were not fighting for Women’s rights. Proclaiming that we are all equal under God while you still have people in bondage was insane by today’s standards. It was clear that the founders of this great nation would do anything to be free but they were not willing to set free the groups that they themselves have oppressed.
I believe that the American Revolution was revolutionary because there were many events, impacts, and effects after the war was over. When something is “Revolutionary” it means that it causes a dramatic or drastic change. In 1776, the Declaration of Independence was written all because the people needed to be heard, from document 2. What if the King listened, would there still have been a war? I do not believe so because so much time was spent trying to get the people
Sex, Lies and Conversation: Lies! Everyone has experienced a problem in communication with the opposite sex, from sports talk, relationship conversation and even deciding to eat and what to eat. Deborah Tannen, acknowledged leader in general communication, offers some advice that may help ease the problem in her article Sex, Lies and Conversation. Tannen’s articles on opposite sex communication have influenced many people on how they now interact with the opposite.
Gandhi was so influential that in 1930, he led 60,000 people on a 25 day salt march to protest the rule in India. Despite all of Gandhi's hard work and dedication to protest, his own generation that he was leading failed to continue what he had started. According to paragraph 2 of Gandhi’s Eulogy it says, “Yet, he must have suffered—suffered for the failing of this generation whom he had trained, suffered because we went away from the path that he had shown us.” According to this, Gandhi’s generation at the time was gently fading away from the path that Gandhi had set for them, and that the generation should’ve followed him because it would bite them in the back because after Gandhi died in 1948, there was no leader to continue his legacy. This is how Gandhi was a persuasive
There is no denying that Gandhi was extremely passionate about paving the way for freedom for
Mohandas Gandhi is one of the greatest nonviolent activists ever. Gandhi came up with the word ahimsa, which meant nonviolence. He also introduced to the world the word satyagraha, which meant peaceful civil disobedience. In 1930 Gandhi and a group of followers began a march of more than 200 miles. Three and a half weeks later they made it to their destination, the sea.
More about Was Gandhi Revolutionary
Fahrenheit 451 Gandhi
380 Words | 2 PagesWhat Was Gandhi's Contribution To The American Revolution Dbq
707 Words | 3 PagesPassive Resistance Gandhi Dbq Essay
1532 Words | 7 PagesWas The American Revolution Truly Revolutionary?
325 Words | 2 PagesCompare And Contrast Gandhi And Civil Disobedience
515 Words | 3 PagesWas The American Revolution Really Revolutionary
388 Words | 2 PagesHow Revolutionary Was The American Revolution Revolutionary
472 Words | 2 PagesThe Poor In Colonial America
140 Words | 1 PagesWas The American Revolution Revolutionary
292 Words | 2 PagesWas The American Revolution Radical Or Radical
158 Words | 1 PagesHow Revolutionary Was The American Revolution Revolutionary?
223 Words | 1 PagesSex Lies And Conversation Deborah Tannen
639 Words | 3 PagesHow Is Gandhi Mandela A Persuasive Person
631 Words | 3 PagesMahatma Gandhi Assassination By Nathhuram Godse
625 Words | 3 PagesMahatma Gandhi Nonviolence Essay
610 Words | 3 Pages