Was Leaving Britain Justified Essay

Although many would state that the colonies leaving Britain was not justified, many events like the King’s tyrannical behavior, and all of the taxation without representation helped prove that leaving Britain was best for the colonies. Above anything else the colonists believed in their personal rights, and equality. However to pay for a war they did not cause, and to be taxed with no say went against all of their ideas of true independence. The Sons of Liberty was born, the Second Continental Congress was formed, and the Declaration of Independence was made all for the sake of a better future of equality and freedom for the colonies.
The colonists leaving Britain can be justified by the continuous tax acts passed without any colony’s representation.

There were many times where the British King was viewed as a tyrant, and the Boston Massacre was one of them. The engraving done by Paul Revere's, “Bloody Massacre”, clearly portrays the tyrannical behaviors of the king. The picture of the Boston Massacre traveled around the colonies, leaving many colonists furious. The king leaving his men in Boston, and the quartering act eventually lead to the tension among the two to finally explode. The king’s need to have a complete control on the colonies, eventually lead to many angered, upset, and some dead. The Boston Massacre can be seen as one of the tyrannical behaviors of the king that justified the colonists departure from Britain. Another form of the king’s tyrannical behavior was seen through the excerpt from “A summary view of the rights of British America” by Thomas Jefferson. The passage states how the king should be servants, representing the people’s voices, not the owners of the people. Thomas Jefferson is implying to the British king that he should be willing to help change the colonists lives in a better way, instead of causing them more things to worry about. Thomas Jefferson’s excerpt justifies that the tyrannical behavior of the king justified the colonists wanting to leave from the tyrant’s grasp. Lastly a passage from Locke’s Social Contract clearly justifies the need for the colonists to separate

In the pamphlet written by Thomas Whately, the author of the Stamp Act, states that colonists should give back to Britain for the war it went through to “protect” the colonists and the colonies. Thomas Whately believed that since Britain used its resources to help protect the colonies from harm, and that the colonists should give back as a contribution. The war started by Britain’s continuous tension with France on lands in the frontier region. The colonists did not have anything to do with the start of the war nor the ending of it, but somehow ended up being the reason for the war itself. Furthermore a letter published in the Boston-Gazette Supplement states that the “Bostonites” severe dislike of the taxes puzzled them. The writer of the letter doesn’t understand why the colonists were so against a tax that had such little effect on the colonists themselves. As most of the taxes were placed on paper products such as newspapers, items that most colonists did not even buy. Therefore the writer was confused on why colonists were so angered over the taxes on the items. Lastly .in the journals of Nicholas Cresswell, an Englishman visiting Virginia, states the horrific acts of the colonists as they insult the king, tarring and feathering anyone helping the tyrants actions. He states how the situation is perfect for a rebellion, and how the New Englanders have persuaded