ipl-logo

Was President Jackson Guilty

475 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: 2 perspectives during the American Indian removal act

While President Jackson might’ve been remembered as a national hero, with his image being immortalized onto the $20 bill, I believe that President Jackson was simply bad at his job of managing the United States, and should be guilty all for the crimes he performed. Not only did President Jackson introduce the spoils system, a method of assigning government positions simply to any person who supported one’s campaign, whether or not they were good at the job, but Jackson also jeopardized the entirety of the US’ economy, leading up to the Panic of 1837, and finally, committed atrocious crimes against the indigenous Native Americans who lived there. While he was viewed as a champion of the people, he should be remembered as a terrible president, …show more content…

The first reason is his the fact that he used the spoils system, a way of giving out government positions to political backers. Needless to say, this is not a good idea: the spoils system encourages bias in the political world towards people who might not deserve acclaim, but will have it anyway due to the appeal of a government job. Another reason why Jackson should be considered guilty in the trial is that he ended up causing the Panic of 1837 (an economic disaster), just for the guise of being on the people’s side. After vetoing the 2nd Bank of US’ charter, Jackson gave all of the remaining money to banks run by the state, which ended up giving out far too many loans and driving the value of the dollar down. This led to an economic collapse which greatly pained the fledgling nation. However, the final nail in the coffin in Jackson’s case for innocence was his treatment of the Native Americans. Jackson said that his priority would be to get the Natives off of their land, and he did so in an extremely gruesome way: after allowing white settlers to encroach onto natives’ land, with the Indian Removal Act, Jackson outright refused to enforce a Supreme Court decision, and forced the Natives to take a snow-ridden several-hundred-mile trek towards the West, without anything but what they could carry on them. In fact, the actions committed by Jackson’s government were so atrocious that they have been compared to the Holocaust by several

Show More
Related
170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

His commitment to the Union, in this case, is admirable. But, it is also plausible to say that Jackson's only motivation for not allowing this to pass was simply to keep a certain amount of power in the national government, in him. It could have all been a selfish ploy in order to keep his power, not an argument for

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever thought of the real impact Andrew Jackson had on the U.S. I think he was not the right fit for the office. Andrew Jackson’s presidency was terrible. My first point is that he abused his power and acted like a king. My second point is he caused rapid inflation and my final point is he spoiled people with jobs.

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew Jackson Throughout history our great nation has been blessed with a copious amount of presidents who have left great legacies that are still renowned. While some presidents have made policies that were detrimental for our nation at the time, Andrew Jackson’s policies were detrimental then and continue to be a source of outrage in our nation today. While Andrew Jackson believed he was making great strives for the nation he displacing an entire population of people from their rightful lands, and is the creator of the corrupt policy known as the spoils system. No one president has caused more damage to his fellow Americans than Andrew Jackson himself, and because of this, he deserves to be impeached and removed from office.

Read More
514 Words | 3 Pages

The Jackson Presidency The seventh president of the United States was a man named Andrew Jackson. Andrew Jackson was a president that could be considered good or bad based on what he did during his terms. Although Andrew Jackson did good things during his presidency, he should be considered a bad president. Andrew Jackson should be considered a bad president because he forced the indians in Georgia to move, destroyed the national bank, and he bad tempered with a power hungry attitude.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Is Andrew Jackson a hero or a villain? Throughout history Jackson has been viewed as both. Some see him as a war hero and the people’s president. Others see him as a racist and a political tyrant. To me, Andrew Jackson is more of a hero.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Hero or villain Guilty or innocent? The case of John Brown gets debated and questioned often. But many people don't know what actually happened or the reasons why he is guilty. “ Old John Brown…. agreed with us thinking slavery is wrong, but that cannot excuse violence bloodshed and treason.

Read More
1293 Words | 6 Pages

Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson was one of the most influential and intelligent Americans to have ever sat on the bench. His service to America is often overlooked and he deserves the most highly regarded respect. Justice Robert Jackson had a humble and modest beginning. Justice Jackson did not attend law school and passed the bar at the age of twenty-one. He practiced law for many years before being appointed a position in Washington D.C.

Read More
322 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson is guilty of crimes against humanity because of his harsh treatment towards the natives and belief in equality for white men. When Jackson was being questioned by the Prosecution, it was established that he used fear to make the Natives Americans sign treaties that pushed them west. When the Native Americans wanted to negotiate these treaties they were either ignored or assaulted. Osceola explained that when he was going over for peace talks, the army captured and killed him. He also said that “Jackson called us his children but didn’t actually treat us like children.”

Read More
383 Words | 2 Pages

Although Andrew Jackson ended up killing people, he was doing what he thought was best for the nation. Even though Jackson tried giving the Native Americans land elsewhere, they fought back, causing the Seminole wars and the trail of tears. Though Jackson had commendable intention multitudes of Native people were killed along with the culture. “[Forced] removal of 20,000 Cherokee from their ancestral lands”1 was probably one of the worst decisions Andrew Jackson could have enforced. Evaluating Andrew Jackson’s decisions we can try and get inside his mind, figuring out why he made the choices he did and what ethical backing he had behind it all.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Jackson was obviously pro-slavery considering he owned about 150 slaves. A lot of people believe that this was not really a bad thing considering the times he lived in but in reality, it does not matter. The fact is this man owned many people as if they were his property, knowing they were living breathing human beings like him, is horrendous. Slavery existed to show off wealth and keep wealth in expense of African-American ’s freedom.

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew Jackson Pro-Impeachment President Andrew Jackson violated states’ rights when he was dealing with south Carolina in the nullification crisis, he issued a proclamation to south Carolina that went against the rights given to each state that allows them to nullify a federal law that they do not agree upon. His proclamation also weakened the states’ power and used it to strengthen his view of government supremacy. We stand for impeachment of Andrew Jackson because he used his presidential influence to overrule the states’ rights. At this point in the 1830s, the unionist philosophy was very strong, the philosophy was “one nation under god, indivisible”.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

What people also do not know is that he is in charge of triggering an economic depression by refusing to renew the charter of the Second Bank of the United States and the institution inflation control policies, that also triggered a panic. This is an example of how he was not a good person. One of many bad things that Andrew Jackson did was killing so many indians that he got the nickname “Indian killer”. He thought that the indians were taking up too much of the american land and he killed them instead of asking them without violence.

Read More
1737 Words | 7 Pages

Coming into the courtroom I believe Jackson was a vicious president who just wanted to kill to get his way, but in the trial, I came to the consensus that Jackson isn’t always that angry old man people perceive him to be. Sure, he’s killed many people and could’ve possibly led to many more deaths, but his crimes against humanities was never fully brought to light. I believed, that prosecution proved that he was an immoral, violent and at times vicious president, but they never proved he committed a large enough crime to affect humanity. In the opening statements, prosecution called Jackson a president that failed to do his job.

Read More
282 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson was a great General and won several battles against all odds. But that doesn’t excuse him for his murderous acts. Not only did he kill but him took pleasure in killing, he bragged about it. As I said he was a killer he didn’t care that being an early president he had to set an example for all future presidents.

Read More

More about Was President Jackson Guilty

Open Document