ipl-logo

Was Rousseau Really Free

2220 Words9 Pages

Freedom is Rousseau’s central preoccupation. In the state of nature, we have natural freedom but once socialisation begins we lose our liberty by becoming dependent on others. Rousseau’s aim is to find a modern form of socialisation that would protect people’s freedom without constraining it, such that “each citizen unites with all but nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 1762:191). He finds the solution in the social contract by which individuals become part of the sovereign and abide by the general will, what makes them free. Rousseau defends the possibility of punishing those who fail to obey the general will by ‘forcing them to be free’. By entering civil society, we gain civil freedom which makes us truly rational and moral, and permits us to obey our own prescribed laws. Violation of the contract means violation of our civil freedom, which equates with saying that we lose our ability to be rational beings that freely decide one’s own will. For Rousseau complying with the general will is a condition of freedom.

This essay will argue that Rousseau’s solution is logical and not self-contradictory, and that forcing to be free is not …show more content…

The sovereign is not merely the addition of all its members, it is a distinct and unified body that exists on its own and can be treated as an individual. Each citizen of this society is bound to the sovereign as is he to the other citizens that form, together with him, the sovereign. Thusly, no one is above anyone else, as each individual has the same rights. The sovereign is not bound in any way, but as it owes its existence to the social contract, it must not harm it in any ways because he would otherwise hurt himself. Its main responsibility is to act in the best interests of the citizens (MacAdam,

Open Document