ipl-logo

Welfarism Vs Punishment

1394 Words6 Pages

Today, we punish criminals through means of either confinement (imprisonment), suspended sentences or a community order. However, in the middle ages, punishment was very different. They used to believe in retribution. This is the idea that punishments should make the criminal pay for what they have done wrong. An eye for an eye. They would have ordeals by fire, water or combat. Ordeal by fire is when the criminal has to hold a glowing hot metal rod. Ordeal by water is when the offender has their hands and feet tied together, they are then thrown into the water and watched to see whether they float or not. The people at this time believed that if they floated, they were innocent, however it was unlikely that any of them floated and the majority …show more content…

This means that as well as being taught the lesson they are needed, they should also receive welfare and the chance of rehabilitation. However, this method of trying to rehabilitate criminals in prison was not very effective since 60% of criminals that were released ended up reoffending. If prisons are spending money on trying to better criminals but the criminals cannot be bettered, it is a waste of money. This is why penal welfarism faced a decline, because it was simply not working. The criminals needed to be punished in a different way, whether it be through deterrence or …show more content…

This means that is they have passed the rehabilitation period with no new convictions, when applying for a job and things of the like, they will not need to disclose any information about their past convictions. The offender will need to serve a custodial sentence (two years for example) and then start their rehabilitation period (4 years for example) as soon as they have completed their sentence. However, criminals with custodial sentences of 4 years and over were not allowed to have the chance of a rehabilitation period. For ex-offenders who can partake in this act, it means they will be given a second chance to fit back into society as a law-abiding citizen and will not have their past convictions help against them for the rest of their lives. It allows these people to start fresh. This has a high chance of giving criminals motivation to stay clean and to not re-offend when they know they have a chance of starting fresh. Criminals are less likely to offend if they know it will benefit them in the

Show More
Related
490 Words | 2 Pages

Crime and Punishment in the Elizabethan Era In the Elizabethan Era there was a lot of punishments for the crimes that people did. There were some punishments that people can live through, and there were some punishments that could lead people to death. During this time people just could not kill somebody and just go to prison, you will go down in painful and sometimes slow death.

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

However, the severity of punishments and the methods used by the law were beneficial and practical and they helped to reduce the amount of crime in England. The article “Crime and Punishment in the Elizabethan Era” expresses that crime was an issue in Elizabethan England, and a threat to the stability of society. To maintain order the penalties for committing minor crimes were generally punished with some form of public humiliation. For major crimes including thievery, murder, and treason those convicted were put to death. The sheer ruthlessness of the punishments discourage any sort of crime as they will scare the citizens into never breaking the law in fear of the consequences.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

As such, American colonists carried the practice of flogging with them to the New World. Mutilation was another know alternative, which involved a strategy of specific deterrence that made it difficult or impossible for individuals to commit future crimes. Throughout history, various

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

The next goal of deterrence is that imprisonment is not so much a deterrent for the offender rather for others in society who are thinking of committing crimes and the fear of prison should deter them from going through with their actions (Sykes, 2007). The last goal of deterrence, imprisonment will keep offenders away from society thus they are not able to prey on the community (Sykes, 2007). The last justification for imprisonment is reform. The use of reform as a justification for imprisonment is based on the idea that prisons can eradicate the causal factors of crimes within an individual and imprisonment can be used as a mean to keep the offender long enough in order for that goal to be accomplished. Based on the entirety of the book, the ground punishment seems to be more closely aligned with the New Jersey State Prison in the 1950s.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

Even the smallest of crimes like stealing a loaf of bread had brutal punishments. The court system was based on the Middle Ages feudal system. In figure 1, this is the Middle Ages feudal system, if decides who is higher up in the order. If two people were in court the higher person in the feudal system was always right (or telling the truth). The person who decided on the punishment was always very high in the feudal system like a lord or sometimes even the monarch.

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

Elizabethan Era punishment for crimes were extremely bloody and brutal compared to the humane standards we have today. The most popular crimes ranged from petty theft to high treason committed by the most popular leader in the government to the lowest and poorest beggar on the streets. Their sanction could be being hung, drawn, and quartered or be walked through town wearing a barrel. There were two classes in England during the Elizabethan Era; the Upper Class, which was mainly nobility, and everyone else. The Upper Class was often times well educated and associated with royalty and other well known people in the government.

Read More
2285 Words | 10 Pages

They are in response to the problems of society and also because of the development on criminal justice reform. They also do this because they are trying to reduce recidivism and supply training that will then lead to reintegration. One reason why they did this is because they want to stop recidivism and make sure that those who were accused of a crime or even convicted want them to be prosecuted be punished and reformed. In today's society it is rare to find a prison that does not have a rehabilitative focus.

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

Punishments ranged from fines to the death penalty. Criminals were sentenced to community service which most famously included dredging the River Thames. Often times criminals were sentenced to time in prison. There were many types of prisons in 1800’s England. A citizen in debt could be sent to a debtor’s prison.

Read More
165 Words | 1 Pages

In the Middle Ages there was very harsh penalties. Small offense had serious punishments as well. Every person had to go through a ordeal if they did something in the Middle Ages. The three ordeals used to determine if someone was innocent or guilty was Ordeal by Fire, Ordeal by Water and Ordeal by Bread.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

By abiding with this type of sentencing there is a bigger slack of discretion I can use. I can base more on the individual as a person. If the individual doesn’t have a prior criminal record this will benefit him in my sentencing. Mitigating Circumstances

Read More
1784 Words | 8 Pages

It is necessary that we examine where punishments originate from to further discuss them as means of deterrence. Beccaria argues that laws are the expression of the social

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

During the Medieval Period, the punishment one received depended on the severity of the crime. Also, more crimes were committed during this time because it was hard to find jobs at the time, the poor had hardly any choice but to steal to survive [S5]. However, people today usually get a fine for most crimes, such as speeding or stealing. Serious crimes, like murder or rape, people get sent to jail for a certain amount of time depending on the severity of the crime. The way we punish today is very different to the way people were punished in medieval times.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

They have more opportunities because they have not been locked in a cell for a number of years. Instead in restorative justice the offender is required to do things like community service and communicating with the victim of their crime. Giving offenders more options after they have committed a crime can help them get back on their feet because they would have a better chance of getting a job. They would have a better chance of getting a job because they wouldn’t be out of a job as long as if they were in jail for years. Also hopefully by the offender not spending years in jail and doing things like community service they learn their lesson and will be less likely to commit another crime in the future compared to someone who spent years in jail.

Read More
1678 Words | 7 Pages

Detention and training orders came into force in 2000, this is a two-part sentence with first part in custody and second part back in the community under supervision. This is supposed to give the youth support on release and more positive reintroduction back in to society. Part of rehabilitation are interventions such as, offending behaviour programmes, target neighbourhood prevention programs, mentoring, restorative justice, and intense supervision and surveillance programs under youth offending teams. However, this could lead to the child being labelled and could make matters worse (Burke, 2016 pp 225/256). Incapacitation and rehabilitation are linked to the positive school - predestined actor from the late 19th century.

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

There is a worldwide trend in the use of penal imprisonment for serious offenses as capital punishment has been renounced by an increasing number of countries. Harsh punishments include capital punishment, life imprisonment and long-term incarceration. These forms of punishments are usually used against serious crimes that are seen as unethical, such as murder, assault and robbery. Many people believe that harsher punishments are more effective as they deter would-be criminals and ensure justice is served. Opposition towards harsh punishments have argued that harsher punishments does not necessarily increase effectiveness because they do not have a deterrent effect, do not decrease recidivism rates and do not provide rehabilitation.

Read More

More about Welfarism Vs Punishment

Related Topics

Open Document