Raven, you are right. The British felt as if the colonies should accept the consequences for the colonists ' actions at the Boston Tea Party. As a form of punishment, the British passed the Intolerable Acts. The Intolerable Acts included the following: the Boston Port Act, which closed Boston 's port until the East India Company was repaid; the Massachusetts Government Act, which empowered the king to elect government officials in Massachusetts; the Administration of Justice Act, which allowed the government to move a colonist 's trial to another colony if a fair trial was unavailable in Massachusetts; and the Quartering Act, which permitted British troops to occupy vacant buildings when in the
The colonist believed that they were still British citizens, although living in North America, and should be given the same rights of a citizen in Great Britain. The insufficient amount of representation in the parliament, rebellion began against the British Empire, and the loyalty of the colonist began to
Do you believe the American Colonists were Patriots or did they commit treason? No I don’t they committed treason. I believe they are patriots and there sacrifices shouldn’t be considered treason. They were just doing what they thought was right and the British forced him.
The final reason the colonists were unjustified was that they were the only reason Britain had treated them so poorly. As a result of the French and Indian War - which was fought for the colonists - the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Act of 1767 were used to pay for war efforts. Also, the Proclamation of 1763, which forced colonists to live east of the Application Mountains, protected the colonists from the Indians and prevented future conflicts between them. The Intolerable Acts of 1774 would not have existed if not for the Boston Tea Party - in which the colonists dumped about 1 million dollars worth of tea into the Boston Harbor: it only existed to demonstrate Britain’s power over the colonists. Finally, the Boston Massacre would have
There are many debates that post to the French and Indian War, the colonist progressed a filling emotion of "division" from the Britain Crown and that is why they were more Pro-America and felt hate for the English. This pure emotion quickened right after fighting broke out; but it t’was not the actual justification the colonists rebelled in the first place. The reason the redcoats lost is due to the fact that King George III and Parliament schemed their way into a military stand-off with the thirteen colonies, when a gov’t based solution would've been less expensive in the long run and much more efficient in keeping the loyalty of some American colonists. Had the British gov’t payed attention to some of its prideful members, who taught the art of respect and bring into agreement our English kin in the thirteen colonies," the war could have been out of the question and avoided. This was not situation that played out to be, however, some British Tories didn’t mind.
The colonists refused to submit to a king that was only interested in their money, causing the colonists to become irate with the British once more. Since Great Britain thought that it was superior to the colonies, Great Britain did not give colonists the opportunity to speak up for what they wanted, which lead the colonists to rebel. The arrogance of Great Britain led to the rebellion of the colonists, which sparked the Revolutionary War through social, economic, and political actions. Furthermore, Great Britain caused a tremendous amount of irritation to develop inside of the colonists. The Revolutionary War showed that it is a necessity for Americans to have their opinions voiced.
At a time when the British Monarchy was establishing itself as the cornerstone of the emerging and dynamic British Constitution, and all British subjects, including those in the North American Colonies, were subjects of the Crown, Price provided the theoretical foundation to justify, and even advocate, the actions of the colonists in severing their ties with Britain. This was a very dangerous thing to do, he was after all lending support to those who were seen by most people as treacherous. However, although he was heavily criticized and was, at one time, fearful of his life, Price resolutely supported the colonists believing that their cause was justified and that the British Government, and the King no less, were guilty of denying these
During the Colonial Era (1492-1763), colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain; due to the inequitable Stamp Act, the insufferable British oppression, and the perceived tyranny of King George III, the king of Great Britain, however, the colonists were unjustified in some of their actions. In Colonial America, colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain, because the Stamp Act was unfair and viewed as punishment. Because of the war, Britain had no other choice but to tax the colonists to pay for the debt. For example, according to document 2, the author states that the act was not only for trade but for “the single purpose of levying money.”
Although some people may believe that the colonists should not have claimed independence from Great Britain, they were justified to claim independence. This is because, the Boston Massacre showed Britain had no respect for the colonists, The early taxes imposed were unfair to the colonists, and the Intolerable acts were too aggressive. The colonists had many reasons for leaving Great Britain's control. That was for many of the mistakes Britain made and probably regretted. The Boston Massacre showed Britain had no respect for the colonists.
The British government was not looking for the best of the people. They were only thinking about what they wanted; the government was not interested in what the people wanted so they decided to make decisions on their own, which resulted in changes that form the United States today. Because of this, they were justified in rebelling and declaring independence. One reason why the colonists decided to rebel and declare independence was because of taxation.
The American colonies are justified to be free and independent of British rule. The colonists were people of British descent that were driven out of England due to the fact that they couldn’t practice their religion freely. Britain began to tax the colonists very unfairly, to pay for the expense of the French and Indian war. Major conflict began when the colonists privacy was invaded and rights were denied, they began to boycott British goods.
Since the beginning of English colonization in North America, the colonists gradually adopted a more individualistic attitude towards England. The colonists began to view themselves as separate from Britain and felt victimized when they enforced numerous “policies” on the colonists. During the period from 1607 to 1745, the Enlightenment and the Great Awakening provided several boosts to the colony’s transition towards a democratic government. The Enlightenment helped the colonists to believe that they had natural rights and led to the challenging of British rule. The Great Awakening was a movement in the colonies that also contributed to the development of rebellious thoughts regarding the British and a desire for independence.
The American Revolution was, to date, the best event to happen on American soil, providing freedom and representation in government to the individuals who fought so hard for it. France and Spain aided our cause, helping this group of brave colonists to defeat the strongest army in the world. But, there is a question still not answered; were the colonists justified in breaking away from Britain? The American colonists were justified in breaking away from the British because there was taxation without representation, they had no freedom, and the British government violated their individual British rights. I believe the American colonists were justified for breaking away from Britain because there was taxation without representation.
Although the truth reality here is the roots of the rebellion of the 13 colonies start from the beginning of the establishment of colonies. According to the lecture 10, “in 1660 through the first series of Navigation Acts, the English parliament sets the rules for how the people in the 13 colonies would live their lives”. This was one of the reasons of the rebellion of the 13 colonies, because the colonies they want to have they own rules and live their lives according to the rules that favoring each colony no only England. The acts that created the parliament was only to benefit England, because specify how the colonies behave between them and the mother land. The colonies beginning to get tired of the England rules and they want a change.
Britain was forcing the colonists to house the British soldiers and there was no compensation. The British government also violated the colonist’s rights by restricting trade by preventing other nations from purchasing products form the North American colonial market. Obviously, the Founding Fathers were justified in rebelling because the British government was taking advantage of the colonists. Parliament applied various taxes, and forced the colonists to house British soldiers which violated the rights of the colonists.
