Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Colonialism in full details
Puritanism in america
Puritanism essay social history of england
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Colonialism in full details
Puritanism in america
Puritanism essay social history of england
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Colonialism in full details
(colonialwarsct.org n.d.) They had the support of the king and queen. They had been authorized to take any land that was not already occupied by Christian settlers. The Puritans believed the Indians were agents of the devil, so they felt no remorse in killing them. In fact, they felt God provided the weaponry and enabled them to kill Indians with ease, and that this pleased God.
Religion influenced the government of the Puritans. They believed that they each had their own boundaries or power given by the Lord (Doc H). Puritans wanted the church and government to intertwine and aid one another, creating a stronger bond. In addition, the Puritan’s emphasis on religious conformity and the attainment of land for their model society led them to engage in wars with neighboring Indian tribes. For instance, William Bradford fought with Pequot tribe in the Pequot War, believing that God is the source of their victory and therefore praise him (Doc D).
However, they were never successful in doing so. In nearly all of colonial America, there was some religious intolerance, with the exception of few colonial areas. In a quite ironic manner, the Puritans displayed and acted out much religious intolerance, even after facing much scrutiny concerning their religion, in England. This statement is proven, when “Puritan New England: Kahn Academy”, mentions “Although many people assume Puritans escaped England to establish religious freedom, they proved to be just as intolerant as the English state church.” The main and pretty much only, exception, would in this case be Rhode Island, seeing as though it was founded by former Puritan Roger Williams, who had been banned from the colony (in opposition to being executed), as a result of the questioning of their actions towards local Native American tribes, he decided to create Rhode Island, as a place of refuge for those seeking religious tolerance, or who had simply been banned from the previous colony they had resided
1. How are the Puritans going to justify the taking of Native American land? The puritans defended taking the local land by trusting it was the correct thing ", the pagan for thine legacy, and the farthest parts of the earth for thy ownership. " And to legitimize their utilization of power to take the land, they referred to Romans 13:2: "Whosoever therefore resister the power, resister the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. "
The American Colonists were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain. Before the outbreak of the American Revolution, tensions had been building between colonists and the British authorities. The injustice and the abuse of power in the government for the Colonists caused two main reasons by which The American Colonists waging war. Injustices against the colonists and the government’s abuse of power were the two main reasons that the American colonists were justified in breaking away from Britain.. First, one of the reasons that The American Colonists were justified was the taxation without representation.
On May 26, 1637, the Pequot were attacked by the Puritans. Another reason why the Puritans migrated to the Americas is that they wanted to purify their religion and they thought of themselves as “God’s Chosen People”. They took the authority to seize the Pequot's lands. As a result of this soured relationship, the war began. The Puritans would kill the Pequot in the most brutal ways.
During the Colonial Era (1492-1763), colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain; due to the inequitable Stamp Act, the insufferable British oppression, and the perceived tyranny of King George III, the king of Great Britain, however, the colonists were unjustified in some of their actions. In Colonial America, colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain, because the Stamp Act was unfair and viewed as punishment. Because of the war, Britain had no other choice but to tax the colonists to pay for the debt. For example, according to document 2, the author states that the act was not only for trade but for “the single purpose of levying money.”
Puritans are known to be judgmental people that believed the natural ( Indians ) are inhuman being. Therefore contradicting by
While the Puritans acted in inhumane ways, the Puritans ' actions towards others reflected their beliefs because of the Puritans ' reasoning to the idea of slavery, the Puritans ' engagement of war, and the Puritans ' brutal acts towards the Indians. The Puritans believed that as long as their actions were supported by the English understanding of religion and morality and were within the bounds of law, these actions were justified. The treatment of people in the 1600s may not have been seen as something peaceful, but during the time it supported the Puritan belief. First, the Puritans ' actions towards others reflected their beliefs because of the Puritans ' reasoning to the idea of slavery. As it has been noted by historians, specifically
I learned that Puritans claimed land that belonged to the natives just as other European settlers. This increasingly became a problem as the Puritans further disrupted the native lifestyle (Corbett 83). Further, the Puritans attempted to convert the natives to Protestantism Christianity just as the settlers in attempted to convert the natives to Catholic Christianity. To sum it up, “the Puritans often treated Native Americans with a brutality equal to that of the Spanish conquistadors and Nathaniel Bacon’s frontiersmen” (Henretta
“Background of The Crucible: The Puritans” Origins of The Puritans Who the Puritans were: “a group organized in England” during the Shakespearean era (1600s) Why were they organized: they thought the Church of England was too absurd and wanted to reform it “Purity”: the lifestyle they needed in their own lives Difference between Pilgrims and Puritans Pilgrims: a person who’s taken a journey Settled in Plymouth, Massachusetts “Reform the church by separating” “Individual responsibility” Puritans Settled in Boston, Massachusetts “Reform the church” “Community responsibility” “Conditions in 1692” Government “No governor”or leader, no actual laws, no official documents This led to attacks from other people (“Native Americans and French”) Environment:
In the 1630’s the English Puritan settlements at Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay Colonies had begun expanding into the rich Connecticut River Valley to accommodate the steady stream of new emigrants from England (The Society of Colonial Wars in the State of Connecticut). During the time that the Puritans of Massachusetts Bay moved towards Connecticut, the Puritans came into great conflict with the Pequot Indians (Pequot Massacres Begin). Arising a war like tribe in southeastern Connecticut, near the center of the, now considered, Thames River. By the spring of 1637, the Pequot’s, causing the Massachusetts governor, John Endecott to organize a large military force to punish the Indians, killed English traders and colonists.
The Puritans and their Pure Motives People will always be born as well as people will always die, but what gives a certain person value is what they do in their lifetime. This value is calculated depending on what the person’s views on life are, but a universal high value is if someone is a hero. Being a hero is something that should not exactly be sought after and it’s almost as if it’s a sacred task. Some people who do seek it succeed but if they are only looking for personal fame then it fails. Two heroic figures are shown in the two historical accounts, The General History of Virginia by John Smith, and Of Plymouth Plantation by William Bradford.
When the Puritans massacred the Pequot, they claimed that they were fulfilling God’s wishes for the evil. In the Bible, it stated that anyone who worshipped the devil, which is who the Puritans believed that Pequot worshipped, deserved the most painful death. The Puritans believed that their actions through the massacre were absolutely necessary and the Pequot tribe deserved to suffer. The real reason behind the massacre was that the Puritans believed they owned complete rights to the land and they were getting tired of having to trade for goods on the land they had ‘discovered.’ The Puritans had a different view of how the land should be controlled and wanted it all for themselves.
Essentially, Puritans are expected to follow a strict set of religious and moral guidelines from which their actions and morality are derived. According to Hall’s A Reforming People, these moral expectations first introduced by the pilgrims were the driving force behind the power that the Puritan ministry had over society: “Ministers and laypeople looked first to congregations as the place where love, mutuality, and righteousness would flourish, and second to civil society. …Alongside love, mutuality, and righteousness they placed another set of values summed up in the word “equity.” Employed in a broad array of contexts, the concept of equity conveyed the colonists’ hopes for justice and fairness in their social world.”