ipl-logo

What Are The Arguments Against Utilitarianism

682 Words3 Pages

Objection against utilitarianism and the theory of invisible hand

The “invisible hand” was first introduced by Adam Smith in “The Wealth of Nations” as a metaphor to describe the unseen price mechanism which generates positive externalities due to individual self-interest to maximize their well-being in allocating resources in the free market. (Thornton, 2009) Smith anticipated that the “invisible hand” will be the most efficient without government intervention.
Utilitarianism, founded by Jeremy Bentham, is a single principle which minimised pain and maximized pleasure and happiness. John Stuart Mill expanded this concept of utility to include not only the quantity, but quality of pleasure, while focusing on rules, instead of individual moral actions. (Utilitarianism, 2015)
Some may argue that “invisible …show more content…

Suppose your live is at risk for the sake of the many lives. For example, being one person with all the healthy organs, you could donate them and save the lives of five. According to the utilitarianism it will be the best and ideal choice to sacrifice yourself so as to save the lives of the other five. This obviously be unlikely to happen as one put the happiness of one above all others due to self-ownership.
Furthermore, Utilitarianism violates the basic of human rights. It technically impossible to measure the value of a person’s life relative to another. Some may argue that a person’s life is measured by the contribution he has or could made to the society but others may argue that they are equal. In order to calculate the exact value of one’s life is thus subjected to each individual perspective and hence impractical. Another point is that happiness cannot be accurately measured. Thus, the concept is flawed from the start. Who says that the unhappiness caused by the death of one person is equal to the happiness gained by the one

Open Document