ipl-logo

What Are The Causes Of The African-American Revolution

910 Words4 Pages

The first slaves that were brought to Jamestown, Virginia in 1619, were African. After this occurrence, slavery spread throughout the American colonies. This marked the beginning of slavery. They were brought to Virginia to help with the production crops such as cotton and tobacco. African-American slaves helped build the economic foundations of the new nation. The invention of the cotton gin in 1793 resulted in the need for more slaves to pick crops (History.com Staff, 2009). The Northern states didn’t feel as though slavery was idealistic when it came to the Revolution. By 1820, there were about 3,000 slaves in the North and almost all of them were working on large farms in New Jersey. Slavery would’ve been easier to get rid of in the North …show more content…

In the upper South, where slaves living in urban communities were more common, this allowed slave owners to make a profit from their extra slaves. Industrialist ran into a problem because they didn 't want the burden of looking after their slave employees outside of the work they were hired for, and they often gave them allowances to pay for their own housing. This allowed slaves in the urban community to live in a diverse area that included blacks that were free, slaves and white people, some of whom might be against slavery (“Slavery in the Civil War Era,” …show more content…

Most Southern cities had ports that allowed access to the to places where slavery was generally banned. White ship captains that were sympathetic and black sailors that were free were infamous for helping slaves escape aboard their ship. Cities were considered opposed to effective slave control. Free blacks had persuaded slaves in the urban areas to join them in their schemes (History,com Staff, 2010). The rural society of slavery had negative effects on the Southern economy. The investment of capital in slaves and land disheartened the growth of the cities and redirected funds from factories. The South lacked what it needed for the industrial base to counter the North when the Civil War had begun. Indeed, in 1860, the South had about the same number of industrial workers, as the North had industrial plants. Other damaging effects arose from the South 's loyalty to rural slavery. Wealthy planters liked to claim they were living out Jefferson 's idea of a democracy. In truth, the South was agricultural because slave owners found that the best way to maintain their wealth and contain their slaves. The needs and beliefs of planters shaped politics in the South on the local, state, and national levels (“Slavery in the Civil War Era,”

Show More
Related
328 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

The reason behind the difference in economies is because of the wide range of soil and land in each region. The land in the South was more fertile and prosperous than the North. Since there was more swampy land in the South where rice was cultivating the reliability for slaves in colonies like Georgia and South Carolina were more present. The reasoning behind the use of slaves was not just because of the fact that whites could order them to do so, it was also for the fact that

Read More
1260 Words | 6 Pages

Wendy Warren, a historian who focuses on Colonial time, goes into depth about how the slave trade erupted in New England in her book New England Bound: Slavery and Colonization in Early America. She explains how African Americans were brought to America and how they were treated once they arrived. One recurring theme that circled around the Africans was economics. The slave trade market took off when companies wanted to invest in the Africans and the New World. Stock companies would be competitive towards who had the rights to certain slave groups as if it was a gigantic game of Monopoly.

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

Southern states believed that it was their divine right to own slaves. The deep south “daily living” contributed to the expansion of slavery (204). Rothman throughout his book explains this and specifically on pg. 21 he talks about life as a slave. He explains how smuggling of slaves, kidnapping of free people, and slave coffles trekking provided way for growth of slavery and growth of antislavery opinions in the North.

Read More
1147 Words | 5 Pages

Miao Ling Tan Ms.Weisman US History 22 November 2017 Annotated Works Cited Bourne, George. From A Condensed Anti-Slavery Bible Argument: By a Citizen of Virginia.1845. Summary of Source: Slavery is not mentioned in the bible by that name or any other laws such as the constitution. They are only being described and written in another way.

Read More
1327 Words | 6 Pages

When the Emancipation Proclamation and 13th Amendment were passed, the labor system that the South had depended on for such large scale cotton production was gone, or at least more expensive than it had been. Still, the Southern economy was mostly unchanged after the civil war. There was still a great demand for cotton, and even though the newly free men and women would cost more money than slaves had, southern landowners still created ways to gain money from poor african americans. The sharecropper system, for example, created an opportunity for poor people to gain their own land and earn money. However, it really created an endless cycle of debt for the poor people because they would constantly owe the landowners who had rented out the

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

Slave labor was much needed in most of american south for agricultural needs. Before the cotton gin was created, rice and tobacco were the main crops in the region. Historians argued that if the cotton gin had not been made to make large profit off of the cotton, the industry would have fallen along with the need of slave laborers. Cotton was the most profitable crop which made it the first choice of agricultural lands to move westward with the americas. Expanding the cotton gin westward put a heavy burden on African slave laborers who were subjugated in the expanding agricultural regions to make, and operate cotton gins.

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

Besides, cotton gins made the South too independent. The Southerners had the priority over people from other regions due to they were the best cotton providers at that time, and everything about cotton was depending on them. They were also able to gain the support from Britain because the need of cotton from Britain. The balance abilities and authorities were the key elements that will make a country unite and success, and nobody wants to see any of the region in the United States has the privilege over others. Cotton gin was invented to be helpful, but it turned to become a machine for the southerners to benefit

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

Because the southern economy relied on crops that meant an enormous amounts of labor that could withstand the new diseases that the newcomers couldn't fight, so the white settlers decided to use slaves. In specifics africans

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

Obviously, Southern economic growth was in the different direction from northern. There were few large cities in the South, which were mainly centers for gathering and shipping cotton. New Orleans was the only city of significant size in the South. The region produced less than 10 percent of the nation 's manufactured goods. Plain Folk of the Old South included three-fourths of white southerners who did not own slaves.

Read More
1280 Words | 6 Pages

Slaves like Douglass had to work on plantations and endure hard working conditions. Slaves in urban area got it easier and as Douglass mentioned “A city slave is almost a freeman, compared with a slave on the plantation. He is much better fed and clothed, and enjoys privileges altogether unknown to the slave on the plantation.” Basically urban slaves had it way better than the slaves in rural area. There were able to be skilled artisans and could occasionally live on their own.

Read More
1474 Words | 6 Pages

The farming industry also prospered outdoing local people and needed other resources to work these growing farms. Indentured servants were the way to go, but these young men wanted more and ended up rebelling for their rights. After the rebel masters were precocious with who they wanted to which they resorted to African Americans. African American were treated cruelly, but some colonies had started to realize that, Northern colonies that thrived in merchant businesses stood up to slavery and wanted it abolished compared to the south who strived for more slavery. In result of the animosity the Mason-Dixon line was created to split the states of slavery rights.

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

Although the Northern side had abolished slavery, the slave trading had flourished and the slave population nearly tripled in the Southern states where cotton was well needed to be harvested. Slaves were important in the South. The South wasn’t going to give up slaves that easily. The country was a divided nation at one point. The top half of the nation was anti-slavery.

Read More
680 Words | 3 Pages

The slaves did most of the things that supported the economy. Such as crops production they would have different grains, olives, and grapes. Farmers could give crops insead of paying their taxes.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

It was for the exploitation and use of these people for work and servitude at the request of the British. Many English people believed that “the color black was freighted with an array of negative images” and thus depicted Blacks as these weak, evil beings (Takaki 50). They saw them not as humans, but as objects to use at their bidding so that wealthy plantation owners could become even wealthier. Even if they were deemed “free”, they were still treated as the lowest class of people and not given any chances to really ground roots. The Northern states, who did not promote the use of slavery, “erected barriers to the entry of blacks” as they felt they didn’t want the “burden” of these people (Gjerde 87).

Read More

More about What Are The Causes Of The African-American Revolution

Open Document