This would also stop medical bankruptcies, improve public health and reduce overall healthcare spending to name a few, (healthcare.procon.org, n.d.). The con argument is this results in socialism and is the individual’s responsibility, it’s not the governments role to secure healthcare and this would decrease the quality and availability of healthcare and increase debt and spending, (healthcare.procon.org,
Different people may criticize adoption of the system but their points have weak foundations. From different perspectives, such arguments tend to support the inefficiency that is persistent in most healthcare facilities. Application of the systems is seen to take of everyone’s welfare while improving the economy of the country. Moreover, success in other developed countries shows that the system is not difficult to apply. The government also needs to consider issues such as viewing of healthcare access by individuals as a right.
This system would be a customized plan to fit the citizen's needs. Healthcare is not the one size fits all system because of the diverse American families. Therefore, individuals deserve the value of care best set at what they think they need. The government can try and tell people what they think would be best, but only the people can decide on what is going to give them optimal care, depending on how much they are willing or unwilling to spend. A Universal health care's real goal is to cover every person, it does not protect the ninth amendment which gives people fundamental rights.
The U.S. could follow models of universal healthcare that have been proven to work in other countries, like Canada and Sweden, in which to lay the framework of a new system of universal healthcare. It would provide coverage for citizens of every economic class via whichever avenue of funding proves to be most efficient. The success of universal healthcare in other nations proves that this is an achievable goal, well within the realm of
People want Healthcare to be free for everyone in the United States. It would release many people from their jobs. In addition, it would cost the Government way to much money. Even if they tax the citizens more, it would just backfire.
I believe that healthcare should be treated as a basic right. Many countries have Universal Healthcare and most of their citizens are much healthier and happier than citizens in the United States. There are pros and cons to every law or reform that is created, in my opinion, I think that the pros out way the cons for Universal Healthcare. Other countries care about their citizens, whereas the American government only cares about money and not the well-being of the population. There are many benefits to having Universal Healthcare, for instance, the stress of how you are going to afford a pregnancy, illness, disease, anything that may come about medical wise is not something to stress over with Universal Healthcare because tax dollars that all citizens pay for help aid in the cost.
Moreover, there are strong financial justifications for universal healthcare. Evidence demonstrates that universal healthcare can result in long-term cost savings for both individuals and the government, dispelling the myth that it is not financially viable. For example, compared to the United States, nations with universal healthcare systems frequently spend less per person on healthcare and get better health outcomes. America may achieve overall cost reduction and increased efficiency by promoting preventative care, negotiating cheaper drug prices, and streamlining administrative costs by implementing a universal healthcare model (Kahn & McDonough, 2018). III.
Too many people are living without health insurance coverage. This issue is causing unnecessary health problems because many individuals will not see the doctor for fear of an extreme expense. This universal system would also address the large number of people who go bankrupt because of the high premiums charged by individual companies and high costs of life saving medical procedures and drugs. We spend almost twice as much as other industrialized countries but still have over forty-million Americans who have no health insurance. Under the single payer system less money would be spent on billing and administrative costs.
“Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” are all unalienable rights(Dec. Of Ind.). This phrase does not seem to accommodate those who our capitalistic society deems indigent. Repudiating about 44 million people’s “right” to healthcare and another 38 million people’s “right” to adequate healthcare is a hypocrisy (PBS). Realizing the discrepancy between the ethics of our country and its execution is the point everyone misses.
Finally in the 1960’s, there was a passage of Medicare and Medicaid voluntary insurance. (Patel 94) In order to make sure more Americans are covered, there must be some kind of reformation of the health care system here in the states. The United States health care system, compared to other countries, is considered immoral to many people. In debates, it has been said that if there were to be medical coverage for everybody, it would lead to “rationing” of health care, but in all reality, the United States already rations health care.
Everyone should be able to be given proper healthcare whether they have insurance or not. America should convert to a universal healthcare system. There are many pros and cons behind the problems that America faces without a universal plan. Health care and human rights is a problematic topic in every country. There is health care spending, historic debate on right to health care, and Obamacare.
Free universal healthcare system is when the price of the healthcare it's lower for the the citizens of all countries. It is a human right that everyone should have access to it. All the inhabitants of the country have the right to healthcare but not all countries offers it. Many people die from the diseases because they don’t have access to a healthcare system that might help them to eliminate their disease.
As Bernie Sanders once said, “Health care must be recognized as a right, not a privilege.” Most developed countries choose to live by this quote while the United States of America chooses to go against it. Universal health care has benefits on multiple levels, whether it’s a single individual or the people in a whole. The U.S is one of the few developed countries that doesn’t offer universal health care to their people, yet the U.S spends more than seventeen percent of their GDP on health insurance. Many people believe that universal health care is a simple one solution problem, but the truth is that there are multiple forms of universal health care that provide all citizens with the health insurance they need.
Deciding what field of study I would like to devote my time to once I enroll in college has been one of the most challenging decisions that I have had to make so far in my life. I greatly understand the significance of the decision, as well as the lasting impact that it will have on my life and all of my future endeavors. After greatly considering the vast possibilities, I believe to have narrowed down my choice to a general field for the time being. The major I would like to pursue in the very imminent future is some division of Engineering and I am extremely confident that the University of Pennsylvania will be the ideal place for me to carry out this plan of action.
Universal health care is a valuable service and should be available in all countries. In many countries millions of people suffer from not having access to healthcare they deserve or not being able to pay for the healthcare they need. In the states alone, an estimated 50 million people do not have insurance because of the inability to pay for it. Universal health care would be beneficial to all countries because it would not exclude anyone from getting the necessary help, it would prevent the insurance companies from denying care, and it would contribute to preventative care to take place.
