From past to present, various groups have bonded together and have made several declarations to put forth their arguments. To this, in order to make their argument effective, speakers have developed various ways to present and shape their argument for their audience. Throughout the texts, The Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson, and The Declaration of Sentiments, written by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, both speakers similarly shaped and presented their arguments to persuade their audience that they have the right to rebel against their government. When the audience reads The Declaration of Independence and The Declaration of Sentiments, the audience is introduced to a universal truth. For instance, in The Declaration of Sentiments, …show more content…
In addition, throughout the body paragraphs, both texts uses claims of values to state how each person is entitled to, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. When using these strong values, the speaker appeals to the audience's emotions to essentially persuades them to rebel to fight for this hope. By appealing to the audience's pathos throughout the body paragraphs, the speakers are intriguing and connecting with the audience, which in turn makes the audience more susceptible to listening to the speaker's argument. The shared hope that the speakers would have with the audience is the “life, liberty, and the pursuit to happiness”. As readers delve deeper into the two texts, the readers are hit with an abundant amount of inductive evidence that supports their minor premise. In the text, The Declaration of Independence, Jefferson gives examples to support how King George III was a despot, which is his minor premise. To further emphasize his inductive reasoning, Jefferson uses the repetitiveness of parallelism to make his statement clearer to the audience and persuade the. Similarly, in The Declaration of Sentiments, Stanton gives readers inductive evidence in a parallel structure to support her minor premise, where men were despots.