Starting from the Brown vs. Board of Education, several groups and organization such as the NAACP, SCLC, and SNCC took several approaches to several issues. The approaches they took were unique, but they seemed to compliment each other as well. On the other hand, Robert Williams proposed his own approaches, which were different than the approaches of other organizations and groups. However, since the dominant ideology of that period of time was the liberal integrationism, they all adhered to this ideology in one way or the other. Although, all of these organizations and groups had their own approaches, their approaches had both strengths and weaknesses, which can be easily noticed throughout the Tyson’s article “Black Power and the Roots of the Freedom Struggle” and the readings …show more content…
For which, they were accused of many problems and issues by some people, which seemed to be their main weaknesses. Among the many accuse, encouraging violence was the most surprising. As Roy Wilkins informs that the Senator Eastland said, “I know you people of are not going to let the NAACP take over your school” the senator was directly accusing of taking over the school, which then turns into encouraging violence. Moving on, The Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) was another liberal integrationist on the left of the NAACP in its use of civil disobedience strategy and this is where it differed from the NAACP. According to the fact, “The Conference firmly believes that all people have a moral responsibility to obey laws that are just” SCLC favored the rulings and laws that were only fair, whereas the NAACP progressed according to every laws and rulings even if they were unfair. However, it was one of their strength to aim for achieving equal rights, especially