She displays a unique sense of humor when it goes with biology by mixing natural history with the advice of sex history, converging wit and rigor; she is able to reassure her anxious correspondents that make certain acts sound very amusing and unnatural. From Darwin’s theory of sexual selection to why sexual reproduction exists at all, she makes it in a way that not
When learning about some of the laws and policies enacted throughout history, it is important to understand the historical, social, and political context in which it was created. This does not mean that these contexts justify or alleviate blame from those who enacted these laws or policies, rather, examining the origin of these laws through an interdisciplinary approach can help to understand why these laws may have been created. Adam Cohen’s Imbeciles, discusses the United States eugenics movement and the sterilization of Carrie Buck. Using concepts from Kitty Calavita’s Invitation to Law and Society, Carrie Buck ’s sterilization will be analyzed from the lens of law and society scholarship.
Although some inherent distinctions between the sexes exist, Orenstein mentions Eliot’s findings on neuroplasticity to suggest that nurture supersedes nature in determining a child’s behavior. A child is most impressionable during the earliest stages of life, when his or her brain is still developing. That is why learning various concepts such as language, for example, is most easily acquired before the age of puberty. Thus, an individual’s upbringing is fundamental in the development of traits and therefore, gender
As technology improves, so do human capabilities of altering nature, which in turn creates increased responsibility. This directly relates to genetic engineering, which is beginning to morph into a reality. There are advocates for both sides that convey their personal opinions about the hypothetical results, but neither is clearly superior since both arguments speculate upon an unknown future. Hungarian psychologist, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, outlines this topic in his essay “The Future of Happiness,” which focuses on the history of selective breeding and compares the goal of happiness with genetic engineering. Csikszentmihalyi alternates between viewpoints regarding genetic engineering but presents a perspective dominated by warning.
I felt that Fernando-Duque’s article was clear, interesting, well-supported, and had good transitions from one topic to the other, however I’d possibly alter it by adding and elaborating on certain topics. This article held my attention for the duration of its four-plus pages which is rare (at least in my case) to see in these types of research articles. The main reason it kept the readers interest was because it began with a larger question relating to human monogamous relationships. Along with this question that naturally grabs reader’s attention, Fernandez-Duque also included roughly a page of background information of monogamous relationships, and the kind of environment Azara’s owl monkeys
Situation: This piece of writing is argumentative based to discuss how scientism is not necessarily the answer to everything but plays a large role in society. In 2012, author Massimo Pigliucci uses the show “The Big Bang Theory” to discuss how science is highly important and necessary for our world to grow, but cannot replace literature, philosophy, and art because each aspect is needed for humans to thrive. An example from the text being that character Howard from the show has an equation to calculate his chances of having sex by figuring out the number of single women who may find him to be attractive (pg. 279). Pigliucci is pointing out that instead of exuding confidence and finding a female to talk to, Howard just uses science to justify why he can or cannot find a female to be with. The same issue is involving Sheldon when he creates “The Friendship Algorithm” in order to make friends (pg. 280).
Throughout her article, Brianna Strumm continuously puts forth insightful examples and scenarios that suggest a higher level of thinking. Strumm consistently refers back to Harper and his “ideological stance on ‘the family’, for example, [which] effectively encourages women to stay home, dis-incentivizes women engaging in paid employment, and positions them to depend on men.” (100, Strumm, 2015) In making this statement, Strumm offers an opportunity for myself as the reader to critically consider my own life and whether or not the conservative views on being a woman has affected me in a negative way. Personally, I was able to apply her statements to my mother’s circumstances as a single parent.
Janet Madelbaum, on the other hand, was unable to reach the same privileged status, although her family managed to provide her the same elite education which Janet completed with success equal to Kate's (cf. 22, TEXT??????). After an outstanding critical publication – and several more mediocre ones – receiving tenure at Harvard should have marked the peak of Janet's career. Kate points out that Janet has “accomplished the highest, at least in the world's view, in the academic marketplace” (45). However, the English faculty at Harvard does not welcome her the way she was used from her old university where she had been “one of the boys” (59).
Reality cannot be avoided or escaped. Many people would rather ignore than accept it. Being in denial is easier because you don't have to come to terms with all the wrong you have done in your life. In the story "On the Sidewalk Bleeding" by Evan Hunter, Andy embodies the fact that there will be a time in your life where facing reality can either bring you peace or destroy you. The story uses various techniques to convey this message, a major one being repetition.
Lesley Crewe effectively argues that love comes with regrets that must be overcome. Her argument is well established through her use of idiosyncratic characters, the relationship between them and the indigenous dialogue. Nonetheless, her usage of the plot makes the argument ineffective because it stretches authenticity frequently and is a basic harlequin romance. For example, having a Hollywood star come to Cape Breton and have a background of getting sexually assaulted is quite ridiculous including the impractical conclusion which unsuccessfully displays her universal message.
Duckworth believes that a strong grit results in success. Angela Duckworth defines grit as, “Grit is a quality that enables individuals work very hard and insist in long-term goals and passion.” It is the perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Perseverance towards goals despite being confronted by significant obstacles and distractions is grit, according to Duckworth. She also believes, “those who believe that diligence and perseverance pay off beat out their less optimistic, and often more talented, counterparts nearly every time.
Nature vs. Nurture In the novel Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides, the main character Callie is a male who was raised as a female for the first sixteen years of his life. Due to his genetic history it created a mutation of his genes that caused 5-alpha-reductase deficiency, which delays the transformation or change of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone. This means that Cal was born with both male and female genes which is better known as a hermaphrodite. This coming of age novel explores the life of Callie and his transition to Cal, the theme found in the story is nature vs. nurture.
In Chapter 19 of The Blank Slate, Steven Pinker discusses children which is one of his hot button topics. Pinker opens with a discussion on the nature-nurture debate - a debate pinning biology and environment against each other. Pinker states that Eric Turkheimer declares the debate to be over because he did a study that was completed over and over again, refined, and yielded the same results time and time again. Thus, creating the three laws of behavioral genetics.
The nature vs. nurture debate centers on whether human behaviour and personality are inherited (nature) or acquired (nurture); in other words, whether a person’s environment or a person’s genetic inheritance determines their behaviour and personality. Goldsmith and Harman (1994) adopt a neutral position, in which both nature and nurture influence people, stating that they “believe that the fundamental issue concerns the interplay between characteristics of the individual and of the relationship” (54). Goldsmith and Harman discuss temperament and attachment for infant, with temperament being linked to the nature side of the debate and attachment being linked with the nurture side; as a result, the infant’s temperament influences the attachment bond between the infant and the mother, but the attachment bond influences the temperament of the child as well. Therefore, both nature and nurture interact with each other to produce people’s behaviour (Harman et al. 54). Andersen and Berk (1998) take on the nurture perspective, while Leary (1999) claims that nature is the determining factor of a person’s personality.
Gilligan ( 1997) achieved the conclusion that Kohlbergs hypothesis did not represent the way that ladies approach moral issues from a morals of consideration, instead of a morals of equity point of view, which moves a portion of the essential presumptions of Kohlbergs hypothesis. Additionally Critics have brought up that Kohlbergs hypothesis of good advancement overemphasizes the idea as equity when settling on good decisions. Commentators including Carol Gilligan have recommended that Kohlbergs hypothesis was sexual orientation one-sided since the majority of the subjects in his example were male. Kohlberg trusted that ladies had a tendency to stay at the third level of good advancement since they put a more grounded emphasis on things, for
