Gilligan ( 1997) achieved the conclusion that Kohlbergs hypothesis did not represent the way that ladies approach moral issues from a morals of consideration, instead of a morals of equity point of view, which moves a portion of the essential presumptions of Kohlbergs hypothesis. Additionally Critics have brought up that Kohlbergs hypothesis of good advancement overemphasizes the idea as equity when settling on good decisions. Commentators including Carol Gilligan have recommended that Kohlbergs hypothesis was sexual orientation one-sided since the majority of the subjects in his example were male. Kohlberg trusted that ladies had a tendency to stay at the third level of good advancement since they put a more grounded emphasis on things, for …show more content…
Similarities and differences of both theories.
Similarities Differences
• Both Piaget and Kohlberg focus their theories on children
• Both theories explain the development of young children
• Similar to Piaget, early stages of moral reasoning are characterized by immediate and concrete rewards or punishments.
• Kohlberg posited that moral reasoning develops as a function of cognitive growth and change as well as experiences and interactions with the environment, and in this way was similar to Piaget.
• Both these psychologists are criticized for not really describing human development fully.
• Kohlberg’s theory is really one of cognitive development as applied to moral understanding because he believed that children developed their moral principles primarily though thinking about them.
• Both these theories are stage theories
• Both theories says social interaction helps children to develop their ability of understanding and identifying others feeling
• • Piaget proposed a stage theory of cognitive development. Kohlberg posited a model of moral development or moral reasoning based on many of Piaget's