ipl-logo

What Is A Good Thesis Statement For Hannibal Life

1653 Words7 Pages

Hannibal
The Brilliant Carthaginian War Strategist

Question:
How did Hannibal?s efforts and life experiences change Roman conquests forever?

Thesis Statement
Hannibal was one of the most resourceful war strategists in the world because of his many achievements, such as: crossing the Alps as a shortcut to attack Rome, making many allies before he attacked Rome, and also because of his strategy in defeating Roman consuls Marcellus and Tiberius, among others.

Hannibal?s Early Life:
Hannibal?s Father was also a renowned Carthaginian military strategist named Hamilcar.
Hannibal became the leader of his father?s army at a very young age despite his many other siblings, owing to their early, unfortunate deaths.
Hannibal?s father also died. Hannibal …show more content…

This battle took place in 219 B.C..
Hannibal took substantial losses due to the city?s heavy fortifications and fierce people.
Citizens managed to injure Hannibal using their famous spears, which they drenched in flaming pitch and threw down upon the attackers.
Hannibal gave them a chance to go away with two garments, but when they refused and started to sabotage the city?s wealth, he put every adult among them to death.
Citizens gave up hope and commited mass suicide by setting the entire town on fire.
The bloody battle which started it all

The Battle of Lake Trasimene:
One of the bloodiest battles in Roman history.
Hannibal?s tactics once again won the day for Carthage?s forces: A small part of Hannibal?s army, or skirmish force, went into a valley close to Lake Trasimene with their backs to the river that ran into the lake. There were hills surrounding both sides of them. In essence, one way in, one way out. Hannibal then hid the rest of his army behind a large hill in front of the skirmish force. The Romans, under the command of Gaius Flaminius, couldn?t resist seeing the seemingly easy challenge as a quick way to crush a part of Carthage?s army. As they marched past the hill where much of Hannibal?s army was waiting, Hannibal ordered a quiet march to the rear of Flaminius?s army, cutting off the exit. Then Hannibal?s army went …show more content…

Hannibal put his elephants first, but when they panicked they turned around and essentially took out an entire flank of Hannibal?s army.
Scipio recreated Hannibal?s flanking tactics at Cannae, and with men all around the Carthaginian army, Hannibal?s forces fell, and the Second Punic Wars would soon be over.
Quotes from: https://www.unrv.com/empire/battle-of-zama.php

Hannibal?s Death:
After the Battle of Zama, Hannibal went into ?exile?. He traveled to Tyre and Ephesus, where he was greeted as a friend by Antiochus iii, who was going to war with the Romans. Hannibal quickly saw that Antiochus?s army was no match for the Romans and offered to head a group of troops to Italy, but the king?s advisors basically said ?No way!!? and the king listened to them. Antiochus was defeated easily later by the Romans at the Battle of Thermopylae. Hannibal fled then to Crete and from there to Anatolia, but when King Prusias i agreed to hand Hannibal over to the Romans, Hannibal poisoned himself.

Timeline:
c. 228 BCE
Hasdrubal is in Spain with Hannibal and their father at Battle of

Show More
Related
441 Words | 2 Pages

The Carthaginian forces hemmed the Roman troops in so much that there was barely any room for them to move, rendering them incapable of even swinging their swords. Pressing their advantage, Hannibal’s men then proceeded to mercilessly slaughter 44,000

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

Historians may argue that Julius Caesar helped rome to make it better and stronger for the people. While this might be true this is misleading because all of Julius Caesar's good actions like giving people more jobs,but it just covered up his worse actions that hurt rome. Also Julius Caesar was named a awful man throughout history from not persevering in hard situations, hurting not helping rome, and doing things for himself. To begin with Julius Caesar was named a awful man from how he didn’t persevere in hard situations. One way he didn't persevere was when Sulla (the emperor of the time) ordered Julius to divorce Cornelia (his first wife) because she was from the family of Sulla's enemies.

Read More
1373 Words | 6 Pages

The Belt Served as a Prognosticator All Along According to Aeneid Book 10, lines 595-603, the engravings on Pallas’ belt is a literal and visual representation of the violent and gory murder of Aegyptus’ fifty sons by the hand of Danaus’ daughters on their wedding night (Aeneid 10.595-603). If I had to make one reasonable guess pertaining to why Pallas would wear it, I would assume that it may have been to represent the intense battles that he was fighting in at that time and his status as a fierce, determined, and aggressive warrior who could bury a sword in “wheezing lungs” (Aeneid 10.445-495). I formed that theory based on the fact that when people look at frightening things,

Read More
1131 Words | 5 Pages

The Roman historian Livy describes the aftermath of the Roman general Marcus Furius Camillius victory over the Gauls in 390 BC. The general attempts to persuade the Roman people to remain in Rome, instead of moving to nearby Roman controlled city Veii. Using Livy’s account of the speech, as well as the Virgil’s mytho-historical tale of Aeneas’ voyage from Troy to Italy, Camillius’ actions will be defended based on three points that he took during his speech; his presentation of Roman religious tradition, national pride, and historical Roman achievements. Camillius’ speech aimed to inspire the Romans that they were not defeated; their best days were actually ahead of them. Camillius begins with an appeal to Roman religious tradition.

Read More
472 Words | 2 Pages

Following a prolonged siege and a bloody struggle, in which Hannibal himself was wounded and the army practically destroyed, the Carthaginians finally took control of the city. Many of the Saguntians chose to commit suicide rather than face subjugation by the Carthaginians. You will importantly realize that the Second Punic War saw Hannibal and his troops–including as many as 90,000 infantry, 12,000 cavalry and a number of elephants–march from Spain across the Alps and into Italy, where they scored a string of victories over Roman troops at Ticinus, Trebia and Trasimene. Hannibal’s daring invasion of Rome reached its height at Cannae in 216 B.C., where he used his superior cavalry to surround a Roman army twice the size of his own and inflict massive casualties. After this disastrous defeat, however, the Romans managed to rebound, and the Carthaginians lost hold in Italy as Rome won victories in Spain and North Africa under the rising young general Publius Cornelius Scipio who was later known as Scipio Africanus.

Read More
1475 Words | 6 Pages

One is also left with the impression that the Romans made every attempt to maintain past treaties with Carthage but that the Carthaginians and Hannibal in particular were set on war. This is exactly what Livy intended when writing on the Second Punic War. The problem is that Livy seems to be writing propaganda more than history. His purpose is to thrust the blame for the war solely on Carthage and Hannibal and leave Rome blameless in the eyes of potential readers. Whether or not this was what Livy actually believed is impossible to know for

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

The Romans decided to attack Carthage in order to get Hannibal to leave. He was defeated at the battle of Zama, ending the Second Punic War (Mulligan). This shows that the Romans did what they had to do in order to get Hannibal to leave their city

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

Hannibal was forced to fight and lost the battle due to confusion between the Carthaginian merchinaries and the Phoenician army. Hannibal was able to escape the city that night since the Romans were not keeping watch as strictly as usual. The next day, the Romans entered Agrigentum and take control. In 261 B.C. the cities inland joined the Romans. The coastal cities left Rome and joined the Carthaginians due to their naval forces.

Read More
117 Words | 1 Pages

In conclusion, the Barcas held the power or partial power in Carthage essentially from the end of the First Punic war until Hannibal went into exile in 195 B.C. Although they did not hold political positions until the end of Hannibal’s time in Carthage, they still shaped the politics of Carthage for more than fifty years. Moreover, the way in which they conducted their political maneuverings, either led others to love them, in the case of Hasdrubal, or hate them in the case of Hanno. Their rivalry with Hanno and his faction clearly weakened their cause in unifying Carthage against Rome. Had they not possessed the arrogance and power hunger, they most likely would have defeated Rome.

Read More
1676 Words | 7 Pages

The Romans, more experienced at sea battles now and had, won a series of decisive victories over Carthage in 241B.C. E the Carthaginians sued for peace"(J. Mark). The Roman military

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

A continuous warfare waged on for hundred years between these neighbors. After this affair subsided the Romans found a new power which posed a formidable threat, Carthage. A battle soon broke out between the two powers over Sicily which led the Carthaginians to give up all rights to Sicily to the Romans. This act created a long lasting tension between the two states which would lead into a second war. Hannibal would be the military leader in this second war who amassed an army of 30,000 - 40,000 troops, 6,000 horses and elephants.

Read More
176 Words | 1 Pages

Around 58 B.C Ceasar conquered Gaul, which is modern day Belgium and France. Pompey who was another brilliant military leader all but forced Ceasar to disband his army. Cease however did not follow this order and instead took his army into Rome from the North. Julius Ceasr completely destroyed Pompey and his followers. Leading on from this victory Ceasr went around the Mediterranean Sea taking

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

The Romans didn’t have much command over the province, but they did have some connections to the further side of the border. Caesar speedily took benefit of these connections to extend the boundaries of Rome beyond the borders of Gaul. Caesar decided to invade Britain, whose tribes seemed to have close relations with Gaul. These expeditions were well-celebrated by the Romans as for the first time Rome had expanded so far. However, Vercingetorix, a noble tribesman of Gaul, with his men, surprisingly rose against Caesar, threatening his power in Gaul.

Read More
1355 Words | 6 Pages

The Trojan horse is perhaps one of the best-known battles in ancient history, even though many believe it to be just a legend. Exhausted of a long war against the Trojans, the Greeks left a large, wooden horse outside the city gates and filled it with soldiers while the rest sailed away. The Trojans saw the horse and brought it into their city celebrating, but at night, the Greeks opened the gates of Troy and attacked, burning the city to the ground. While battles since have involved trickery, not many made to the level of the Greeks. Perhaps the most common battle strategy has been attacking, using numbers and the element of surprise to the advantage.

Read More

More about What Is A Good Thesis Statement For Hannibal Life

Related Topics

Open Document