What Is The Relationship Between Chief Ken Fortier And The Riverside Police Department

Chief Ken Fortier was the type of leader that soon after he becomes appointed the city of Riverside, California wished they would have never chosen him to become their chief. Consequently, Riverside previously had problems before Fortier became elected. Therefore, after Fortier had served as Chief for two years, he caused more problems than himself alone could fix. Although, Fortier had some spectacular ideas his ideas were too late in the game.

However, Fortier, he assisted in revamping the Riverside police department's administration, helping to install modern systems for everything from budgeting to the serving of search warrants, and he could lay the foundations for community policing in the city of spearheading an operation of an area

The Riverside Police Department’s relationship with the community was similar, in the sense that the department had a moderately decent public image with the greatest of the city, but unusually little direct dialogue outside of individual calls for service and news reports on specific crimes had become initiated (Cordner, 2016, p. 486-492).

At first, Ed Davis like Fortier thrown in a bunch of mess and it seemed as if there was not going to become a decent ending in the town of Lowell, Massachusetts. When Lowell Police Department elected Captain Ed Davis, Davis he became appointed as the Acting Superintendent, he began to initiate strategic planning and a variety of internal operational and administrative changes. Besides, he focused considerable attention on building a coalition of support in the outside world. Furthermore, Davis began to open the department's decision

But after the presentation-when, the department presented crime statistics, and other essential information about the two areas-sentiment had switched, and the group overwhelmingly voted to proceed with the Boy's Club site (Cordner, 2016, p. 486-492).

The case study does not give us much information about Davis leadership or management style within the organization. Davis certainly seemed to exemplify the statesman style of executive leadership discussed in Case 4 and I would also say that he exhibited transformational leadership in the examples provided in the case.

The case makes it clear that Chief Fortier made some efforts to engage members of the department in the change process, but they were not always successful or seen as sincere. In contrast to the "high trust, low control" management system that preceded him in Riverside, his approach seems to have included elements of the autocratic and diplomatic leadership styles, and probably comes closest to the "Administrator" executive style discussed in Chapter 7. There was no indication that he tried to generate additional outside pressure for change, such as Chief Davis did in Lowell, although it may not have been needed since he was brought in based on city hall's belief that change was needed. Overall, his approach was not very successful.