ipl-logo

What Is Utilitarianism Right Or Wrong

1438 Words6 Pages

One of the major dilemmas in the philosophical community surrounds which moral theory should determine whether an action is right or wrong. Philosophers have sought a solution to the problem since it involves important aspects of daily life, namely how to judge the moral worth and acceptability of actions. Different utilitarian theories have been proposed, but a criticism regarding the way they address promises and justice poses a problem. This criticism must be analyzed through act and rule utilitarian perspectives to determine whether either form of utilitarianism can be a plausible theory of morality. In this paper, I will examine the theory of utilitarianism. Within the examination, I will begin by explaining two situations in which that E.F. Carritt illustrates problems …show more content…

The only way in which this action is not an ideal case of utilitarian punishment is that the probability that the victim himself were to commit this sort of crime is lower than the probability that a real felon would commit this crime. In all other senses, hanging the innocent man serves as a perfect deterrent and promotes increased happiness. This situation also poses challenges to utilitarianism. Primarily, it forgets about rights: it does not grant an innocent man rights simply for being innocent. Utilitarianism only thinks of the duty to increase happiness in the most convenient and the greatest way possible. In doing so, the only right that is ever mentioned is the one that says that all men have one and the same right, which is that of trying to increase total happiness. One right that utilitarianism denies is the right that someone has when they are innocent: the right to not be punished for an action they did not do. In this way, utilitarianism does not respect the institution of justice that is necessary for a functional

Show More
Related

Unit 2 Assignment: Ethical Theories Comparison Outline

880 Words | 4 Pages

HU245 Unit 2 Assignment: Ethical Theories Comparison Outline I. Utilitarianism A. How is “good” Determined (what does it say right/wrong) - Do what will generate the greatest good for everyone involved, self-included.

Read More

Philippa Foot Arguments Against Utilitarianism

1325 Words | 6 Pages

Caleb Stephens April 15, 2017 Introduction to Philosophy The goal of this paper is to demonstrate that Philippa Foot’s objection, raised to her own argument against utilitarianism, is correct. Her initial thesis is that benevolence, while the foundation of utilitarianism, is an internal end of morality, rather than the ultimate end of morality. The possible objection to this that there must be some overarching reason behind morality, which must imply a form of consequentialism. The response she offers is that there should be some other form of morality, which is a weak argument, as it does not provide an alternate conception of morality itself.

Read More

Objection To Act Utilitarianism

1217 Words | 5 Pages

Neither act or rule utilitarianism is broad enough to fit every moral decision into their theory. Consequently, utilitarianism in general is

Read More

Summary Of Bernard Williams A Critique Of Utilitarianism

1565 Words | 7 Pages

Bernard Williams’ essay, A Critique of Utilitarianism, launches a rather scathing criticism of J. J. C. Smart’s, An Outline of a System of Utilitarian ethics. Even though Williams claims his essay is not a direct response to Smart’s paper, the manner in which he constantly refers to Smart’s work indicates that Smart’s version of Utilitarianism, referred to as act-Utilitarianism, is the main focus of Williams’ critique. Smart illustrates the distinction between act-Utilitarianism and rule-Utilitarianism early on in his work. He says that act-Utilitarianism is the idea that the rightness of an action depends on the total goodness of an action’s consequences.

Read More

Justice What's The Right Thing To Do Essay

895 Words | 4 Pages

In the book “Justice: What’s the right thing to do?” the author, Michael J. Sandel, reveals six primary ethical approaches, which can be utilized to answer the fundamental question of the book, “ What’s the right thing to do?” These six approaches consist of utilitarianism, libertarianism, Locke, Kant liberal egalitarian and Aristotle. Utilitarianism consists of the principle of utility, which expresses the idea that moral actions are composed of those, which deliver the greatest amount of joy or happiness to the most amount of people.

Read More

Utilitarianism Flaws

92 Words | 1 Pages

Exactly, you would want your child to be saved as well. That 's one of the major flaws I see in utilitarianism. The rule of utilitarianism is that the decision that brings the most happiness should be made. I 'm not saying the disabled child wouldn 't bring any happiness, I 'm saying in this case the neighbor 's four kids would bring more happiness to society rather than the disabled one. The act of utilitarianism is a cruel system, but if one wants to incorporate into society then they should incorporate it completely rather than

Read More

Because Torture Is Wrong Analysis

381 Words | 2 Pages

“Kant's criticisms of utilitarianism have become famous enough to warrant some separate discussion. Utilitarian moral theories evaluate the moral worth of action on the basis of happiness that is produced by an action.” “The utilitarian theories are driven by the merely contingent inclination in humans for pleasure and happiness, not by the universal moral law dictated by reason.” “His ethical theory has been as influential as, if not more influential than, his work in epistemology and metaphysics. Most of Kant's work on ethics is presented in two works.

Read More

What's The Right Thing To Do By Michael Sandel Summary

963 Words | 4 Pages

What’s the Right Thing to do? by Michael J. Sandel discusses how there are three different approaches to justice: welfare, virtue, and freedom. The theme of the book is on how and what is considered moral. He introduces several perspectives on morality and we as readers are given insight into what people of different groups consider the rights and wrongs of morality. Some of these different beliefs are utilitarianism, libertarianism, and different philosophers views.

Read More

Comparing Kantian Ethics And Utilitarianism

784 Words | 4 Pages

Ethical theories are philosophical concepts put in place to help justify and evaluate the morality of human actions. These ethics are seen as fundamental principles for decent human conduct when deciding what is right and wrong. Two of the most well known ethical theories are Kantian Ethics and Utilitarianism. Kantian ethics defines morality based on an individual’s rationality and self-control (Warburton pg: 38). Where as Utilitarianism defines morality based upon the ability to express pleasure and avoid pain (Warburton pg:47) Kantian ethics is categorized as a duty-based theory (Warburton pg: 39).

Read More

Utilitarianism Vs Natural Rights Analysis

447 Words | 2 Pages

Utilitarianism wants to ensure happiness of the majority and will make decision based on this standard (Malcolmson et al., 9). In contrast to utilitarianism, natural rights support that every human being is born with rights that cannot be taken away from them (Malcolmson et al., 8). Utilitarianism counter argues

Read More

Rule Utilitarianism

1193 Words | 5 Pages

Rule utilitarian’s believe that they must obey the rules and must have a moral code in order to fulfill and maximize happiness and pleasure. Meaning that rules and laws that produce better results should be enforced. Rule utilitarianism focuses on the deontological theories, meaning that their principle is that we as human beings should not do evil, and should be optimistic and that the good will follow after that. This type of theory focuses on the rules and duties that the individual must use in order to reach the greater happiness and pleasure. In addition, rule utilitarianism has adapted a couple of outlooks that emphasize the importance of the moral code after the action has been committed.

Read More

Deontology Vs Utilitarianism Essay

431 Words | 2 Pages

Introduction In this essay, I will be comparing Deontology to Utilitarianism. I will attempt to substantiate why I am justified in arguing that Deontology is a superior moral theory than Utilitarianism. A Discussion of the Main Elements of Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a moral theory developed by English philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1947 – 1832) and refined by fellow countryman John Stuart Mill (1806 – 1873).

Read More

Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism

1228 Words | 5 Pages

Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two of the most notable philosophers in normative ethics. This branch of ethics is based on moral standards that determine what is considered morally right and wrong. This paper will focus on Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology and J.S. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism. While Mill takes a consequentialist approach, focused on the belief that actions are right if they are for the benefit of a majority, Kant is solely concerned with the nature of duty and obligation, regardless of the outcome. This paper will also reveal that Kantian ethics, in my opinion, is a better moral law to follow compared to the utilitarian position.

Read More

Exam Cheating Utilitarianism Analysis

859 Words | 4 Pages

It cannot account for social justice and other human rights. Since utilitarianism

Read More

Strengths And Weaknesses Of Utilitarianism

1711 Words | 7 Pages

Suppose a conductor is driving his train and the breaks are defect. The rails lead directly into a cluster of five people who would all die if the train will go this direction. However, the conductor can change onto another track where only one person is standing hence only one person would die. How should the conductor react (Hare, 1964)? Is it possible to condense the problem to a rather simple maximization problem in example that the action is taken, which would kill the least people?

Read More

More about What Is Utilitarianism Right Or Wrong

Open Document