William Anderson's "School Dress Codes and Uniform Policies" (2002) and Sarah Deane's "Dressing Diversity: Politics of Difference: The Case of School Uniforms" (2015) provide two crucial perspectives in the continuing debate over school costumes and dress codes. Anderson underscores the need to introduce school uniforms so that students become disciplined and accept equality; on the contrary, Deane has concerns about the possible negative impacts of uniforms on students' diversity and multiculturalism. This paper aims to find a middle-ground solution that contains elements from both arguments to develop an efficient policy. Pro-Uniform Rationales According to Anderson, school uniforms promote the theme of fraternity among the students and minimize differences and diversions …show more content…
Culture and diversity: She supports changes in particular practices that would imply the freedom of dressing with specific rules and regulations, so students would be free to dress reasonably. Comparison and contrast While Anderson focuses on establishing a positive learning environment through increased capital, Deane also has the same goal as Anderson in his effort to reform the discipline of behaviorists that make the students. Anderson prioritizes this issue in order to minimize distractions and promote justice, while Deane advocates for individualism and adopts a permissive stance towards clothing standards. Anderson advocates for the standardization of templates for pragmatic purposes, although Deane asserts that allowing students to write freely is advantageous. However, cultural pluralism and self-determination are affected differently by knowledge. Anderson's universal mandate reduces cultural variation, while Deane's may cause divisiveness if not properly