“Reading is the sole means by which we slip, involuntarily, often helplessly, into another’s skin, another’s voice, another’s soul.” Readers throughout the globe enjoy all kinds of books every day. Books can bring different people together through sharing the same likings. The controversial issue of book banning will be examined in Six Dr. Seuss Books Won’t Be Published Anymore Because of Racist Images – by Mark Pratt, Why “ Fahrenheit 451” Will Always Be Terrifying – by Jeffrey Somers, N.C. School Board’s Decision to Ban Award-Winning Novel Incenses Community– by Los Angeles Times, What It’s Like to Top Banned-Book Lists Around the World – by Dave Pilkey, and The First Amendment. Book banning is a transgression of your rights under The First Amendment because it takes away the authors freedom of speech, suppresses the educational access kids …show more content…
In New York Times Co. v. United States, 1971: This landmark Supreme Court case made it possible for The New York Times and Washington Post newspapers to publish the contents of the Pentagon Papers without risk of government censorship. This should be allowed for authors in the modern times too. According to “What It’s Like to Top Banned Book List Around the World” Dav Pilkey, “people often ask me how I want to respond to those critics who would rather see my books pulled from shelves than handed to young readers. I do have an answer, and it boils down to the fact that not every book is right for every person. Some grown-ups are not amused by the kinds of things that make most children laugh, and so they try to stomp those things out.” What he is saying is true. When someone bans a book, you are not only making it hard for the kids to read that book, but also the author to make money and for their books to be discovered. This is why banning books should not be allowed due to the effect on