What Was The Difference In The Field A Cannon Tube

In this essay, we are going to address the difference in the Field Artillery Cannon Tubes and the positive and negative effects they have had in each war over the years including changes to the cannon tubes from the original cast iron muzzle loaded tube. Examples, being the bore rifling and the muzzle break. Advancements such as these have affected the way the Field Artillery has fought in battles such as the battle of Monmouth where the max range of guns during this era was about 1,000 yards. Today we have the ability to shoot 18,100 meters with a standard high explosive round. Cannon tubes have made all the difference over the years we have been utilizing the Field Artillery to fight wars.

One of the very first cannons ever tubes used by the United States was the muzzle-loaded cast iron cannon. This tube was made by pouring molten iron into a cast resulting in a solid tube that had to have its bore drilled out. Cannons such as these used in battles such as Siege of Yorktown, and Siege of Boston. These cannons some considered being the reason America won the Revolutionary War. It was wars like this that has influenced the many upgrades made to

This tube was not very accurate because the cannonball that used couldn’t control the cannonball as it went through the tube. The range for this cannon was nearly 1000 yards, and its accuracy was weak, but it was only used to destroy building structures for the infantry to breach a wall. During the third quarter of the 17th century, large guns came to be designated by the weight of their projectiles and secondarily by their other characteristics—i.e., whether they were field or siege types, and whether they were called light or heavy, short or long. The name cannon gradually came to be applied to every gun fired from a carriage or fixed mount and with a bore more significant than one inch (Britannica