When I Heard The Learn D Astronomer Analysis

747 Words3 Pages

“When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer”

The narrator of this story is recalling a time when he got to sit and listen to a discerning astronomer in a lecture, who everyone seemed to love; but his words were missing the point, he laid facts out in numbers and graphs. This man, the learn’d astronomer, seems to have forgotten about the simple beauty of outer space, feeling nauseated with the immense complexity of it all Whitman has to leave. Once he leaves lecture hall he is once again reminded of his love for the magnificence that the stars in the sky hold. The narrator would much rather admire the perfect way the stars calmed him in silence without an explanation for their existence.

Waltman is examining space in ways that we have discussed in …show more content…

What if it is all up to interpretation of the readings of both spirituality and math and science? Let’s consider Christianity as the spirituality and compare it to scientific facts. Corinthians 15:41 “There is one glory of the sun, another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for one star differs from another star in glory.” This explains that no star in space is alike which is scientifically true, one just has to be able to truthfully tie this quote in with facts. Yet another example of where the bible matches a scientifically correct fact, Job 26:7 “He stretches out the north over empty space; He hangs the earth on nothing.” This can explain the suspension of Earth in the sky as is “hangs on nothing”. Finally Jeremiah 31:35,36 “Thus says the LORD, Who gives the sun for a light by day, The ordinances of the moon and the stars for a light by night, Who disturbs the sea, And its waves roar(The LORD of hosts is His name):“ Which sights what we know to be true of space and Earth today. Are these examples the works of God or do they just exist because they had to? Stephen Hawking explains that many religious leaders use the example of the Big Bang as proof of their religion since there is no true scientific explanation as to why or how it could have happened without an outside force acting upon it. “This is that the classical theory, does not enable one to