Why Did Sectionalism Lead To The Civil War

730 Words3 Pages

"The two systems [slave and free-labor] are... incompatible. They have never permanently existed together in one country, and they never can."- Republican Senator William H. Seward, from a speech entitled "On The Irrepressible Conflict," delivered in New York, 185851. The South and the North had differences in ideas, economy, politics, etc. However, slavery was their biggest issue. The North’s ignorance of the South’s reliance on slavery had caused much tension between them throughout the years. Slavery led to the start of the Civil War because of slave vs. free states, tech advancement, and sectionalism. One of the main reasons was Slave vs free states, which was also the first piece of thread from the ball of chaos. “... the original thirteen states (New Hampshire, Massachusetts, …show more content…

They show this in the article How Did Sectionalism Lead to the Civil War? When it states. “In 1860, the Republicans nominated Abraham Lincoln for the presidency. When Lincoln won — the first Republican to win the White House — Southerners reacted with panic. Despite Lincoln's stated commitment to halt slavery's expansion in the West, but maintain it where it already existed, Southerners believed he would ban slavery outright. Sectional jealousies came to a head, and South Carolina became the first state to secede by the end of 1860. Other Southern states, distrustful of the Northern section of the country, followed South Carolina's lead, and this rebellion resulted in the Civil War.” (“How Did Sectionalism Lead to the Civil War? | Synonym,”) Sectionalism is the practice of one's loyalty to their region or section of the country, rather than to the country. And after the South felt threatened by not only abolitionist but their own president. They felt like they had no choice but to practice sectionalism. Which was the last blow, and it started South vs north, mostly known as the civil

More about Why Did Sectionalism Lead To The Civil War