More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive and negative aspects of media effects for the human behavior
Human nature good or evil
Human nature good or evil
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Similarly, another possible explanation for these atrocious acts is the fact that in Japan’s militaristic society, the Japanese felt that they were racially and morally superior to all other races, and, due to government propaganda, carried an unbelievable amount of racism and prejudice for their enemies (Hillenbrand 201). Clearly, beliefs and a quest of necessity and destiny also fueled the inhumane, violent acts of World War II. If one takes a closer look at the individuals who carried out these atrocious acts, specifically POW camp guards like the Bird, another common question is what motivated specific people to carry out these crimes. For the Bird, the justifications for his behavior include, “...madness...raw brutality gave him sway over men that his rank did not...satisfying his sexual desire by hurting them” (Hillenbrand 242). These three reasons along with the two social reasons all provide clues and a begin to create an explanation for some of history’s the worst acts of atrocity and cruelty.
An Analysis of the Relation between Violence and Compassion Violence is the notorious cause of conflicts around the world. This theme arises many times within the novel “Ender’s Game,” written by Orson Scott Card. Ender Wiggin is just a young boy when he is expected to save all of mankind. Through constant fear of becoming like his abusive brother, Peter, Ender unknowingly executes an entire species, known as buggers. After enduring immense self-conflict, Ender is finally able to restore his compassion, and identity.
This illustrates how society can be negatively impacted by the absence of a structured system and lead to violent behavior, as the boys did. When the structure is lost, so is a civilization
Since the beginning of the world, everyone has their own point of view on the battle between good and evil. Since these two are opposite behaviors, good and evil must have nothing in common, right? I believe that evil is only evil by the way someone perceives it to be. For example, let 's say a man robbed a woman 's purse ; to that guy who stole the purse, it 's probably the only way to get enough money to stay, but to the woman she just lost the money she had earned. Now to the woman, the man was bad, but to the man, he is just trying to survive.
Art Speiglmans graphic novel ‘Maus’ and M.k shymalan’s film ‘the village’ both show effectively how control achieved by fear leads to corruption. In the two texts this is expressed in different ways but in both texts it is shown that this corruption leads to the corruption of innocence, violence and affects both the controller and the controlled. When control is achieved by fear it usually results in the loss of innocence. When innocence is lost it is mixed into the evils of the world. This idea is highlighted in both ‘Maus’ and ‘the village.
War and terrorism cause children to live in a toxic and violent environment, causing them to sometimes turn to violence and terrorism. Substance dependence and substance abuse cause an impairing of judgment and may cause those who are addicted to have a violent behavior when they do not get the substance on a daily basis. Darth Vader is an example of someone who turned to evil to help change his family’s fate, but ended up as a ruthless and hate-filled being. While people in these situations are inherently good and usually mean no harm, their situations and environment around them cause to act in a way where their inherent good becomes
When soldiers from world war two went off and killed people, most people don't think about where that violence stems from but in a war . The nonfiction articles “The Men Who Pulled the Trigger” and “Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki” shows that people put in bad situations do things that they don't even need to believe in just because it stems from hierarchy and environment and in the book Lord Of The Flies it suggests the same. The environment and hierarchy surrounding people cause violence. Both texts suggest that violence is caused by hierarchy.
We as human beings both create and endure evil of many different varieties and levels of severity on a daily basis. Evil, both moral and natural, is recognized and spoken of constantly. Whether in sermons declaring the ultimate result of sin and evil from the perspective of the church, the daily news reports updating us on the War in Iraq or informing us of a local murder, or the knowledge of the ongoing struggle to rebuild a community which was destroyed during a catastrophic storm, earthquake, or wildfire, we without a doubt live amidst evil. Many of us have very differing philosophies on the proper way to define evil, for example, whether evil is intentional or a natural balancing force, whether evil is universal, or if one's particular
The reliance on violence and tendency to do evil captures the zeitgeist of the
The Monitor on Psychology article “What makes good people do bad things?” by Melissa Dittmann analyzes the results of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Stanford psychology professor Phillip Zimbardo in 1971 and discusses what the experiment can tell us about human nature and what causes humans to be evil. In the novel “Lord of the Flies” the author William Golding discusses the effects of the theories mentioned in the article by creating his own fictional experiment with children stranded on an island during a nuclear war. Throughout his novel Golding explores the focus of Dittmann’s article; that environments and situations can bring out the evil that is inside all of us. People can act good or bad depending on their environment, and these actions are not entirely their fault because when people are not held accountable for their actions their more violent natures are revealed.
This concept of punishment and the way it is applied to children leads to the first of Heinlein’s criticisms of western society, that being the refusal of western society to turn its children into adults in Heinlein’s eyes. A second criticism that Heinlein makes about western society has to do with western society’s aversion to war. Heinlein believes that war is a natural, valid, and necessary. When it comes to war, Heinlein takes a social darwinist perspective, believing that war is merely an extension of the competition which animals face in nature which drives evolution. Heinlein’s two main justifications of war have to do with population.
During the Taliban’s rule in Afghanistan the ethnic group of Hazaras were violently and immorally persecuted. This persecution and discrimination evolved to be more violent, leading to Hazara massacres where the military would attack Hazara land and commit war crimes of rape, torture and other abuses. This persecution is sufficiently evident in The Kite Runner. The Hazaras faced denial of their basic civil rights in political, economical and social areas. Focusing on social inequalities, in this time period, children were influenced by the social class of their parents and the desired ideal of wiping out an entire group of people, “If idiots like you and your father didn’t take people in we’d be rid of them by now.
While the protagonist, Alex, may choose vicious acts, he chooses them with a clear ethical capacity. On the other hand, when being controlled by the government, he loses the part of him that makes him human. Individuals may not always make the best choice, but humanity comes from a human’s ability to choose between right and wrong. In this case, the destruction of Alex’s humanity proves that it is better to be bad by choice, than to be good by government coercion.
Throughout Chapter five of her book Shadows of War, Carolyn Nordstrom shares her views on war in terms of social, physical and mental goals and punishes of such violence. To begin, one of the first goals of war as defined by Nordstrom is a direct result of a threat of loss of control. She explains that it is common for one military to feel the need to destroy another when their control over a certain (land area owned or controlled by someone) is under threat (56). An interesting point that Nordstrom makes is relating to/about (community of people/all good people in the world)'s do not tell the difference between the existence of different violences. As stated by Nordstrom, most people will naturally tell/show the difference between different wars; however, very few tell/show the difference between the experience of violence throughout such wars (57).
After inspecting these events, you would wonder if people are really evil. Others think that people become evil because they are altered by their society or community. As a civilization, this controversy is compelling because understanding the root of
