ipl-logo

Why Do People Have The Right To Remain Silent

500 Words2 Pages

You Have the Right to Remain Silent..., sound familiar, this is the first of the Miranda Rights. Miranda Rights are the rights that any person who is taken into police custody is entitled to. As stated in the sixth amendment, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial,...” this means that anyone taken into custody by authorities has the right to a trial to prove themselves either innocent or guilty. Some questions people might ask about the Miranda Rights are, “Why is it important for people to have their Miranda Rights read to them while they are being questioned by police?”, and “Why do people have the right to remain silent?”, or “Why should they have a right to have a lawyer present when they are being questioned?” These are all very good questions.

It is important for the people taken to be questioned to have their Miranda Rights read to them. This is because the warning informs the suspects who …show more content…

If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you.” These are the third and fourth Miranda Rights. They are saying that suspects can consult a lawyer to support them during their questioning and trial. If they can’t afford or do not have an attorney, the authorities will provide them with one. Suspects are supported by their lawyers whether they plead guilty or innocent.

All of the Miranda Rights came to be, due to the case Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Ernesto Miranda was accused of rape and kidnapping. He was a poor, uneducated man who didn’t know much about law and his rights. After his questioning, Miranda confessed to the crimes, his confession was used against him in trial, and he was found guilty of both crimes. He was sentenced to prison for thirty years. Miranda did not know and was not told that he had certain constitutional rights. This case lead to the creation of the Miranda Rights and police have to read these rights to each person who is being

Show More
Related

Miranda's Confession, Injustice In Pheonix, Arizona

364 Words | 2 Pages

In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Pheonix, Arizona for the kidnapping and raping of a woman. When questioned by police officers, Miranda would eventually give a confession, and sign it, which wasn 't the case.. Before the court, this confession would be used against Miranda, and with it, the implication that it was received voluntarily and with the convicted knowing his rights. Miranda was convicted with a 20-30 year sentence. Upon eventually learning that his confession was obtained unlawfully, Miranda would appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court, asking for an overturn, and when that fell through, would turn to the United States Supreme Court, filing a habeas corpus.

Read More

Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Summary

437 Words | 2 Pages

Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark case where Ernesto Miranda was arrested for rape and kidnapping and was refused an attorney even after he requested one during custodial interrogation, but the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Miranda's confession could not be used because Miranda was unaware of his Fifth Amendment right to refrain from making self incrimination and Sixth Amendment right to have legal counsel, nor were his rights made known to him by investigators, even after Miranda requested legal counsel (Bethel, 2015).   According to Criminal Law and Procedure, Miranda protects the suspect more than anyone else in the equation as it allows the suspect to be aware of their right to remain silent and that legal counsel is available to them if they

Read More

Miranda Vs. Arizona Policing Cases

538 Words | 3 Pages

Miranda, reversed the judgment of the New York Court of Appeals vs. Vignera, reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vs. Westover, and affirmed the judgment of the Supreme Court of California vs. Stewart. In the outcome of the case we now use the Miranda Rights which are as followed "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you.

Read More

Advantages Of Jfrom The 6th Amendment

173 Words | 1 Pages

There are some very important rights granted to you jfrom the 6th amendment which I think if you are going to trial you should try and use to your advantage. you will get a trial by a jury and also with that jury they will be able to hear all witnesses and see all evidence received for the case. The opportunity to see, hear, and confront the witnesses presenting the case against them as well. They will get an chance to call witnesses and even have the court give subpoenas to make sure the witnesses appear they also can testify themselves it they would like to if not they can refuse to testify. they will have the right to cross-examine a witness who is trying to testify against them as well.

Read More

Alito's Attack On Miranda Warnings Is Worse Than It Seems By Mark Stern

1486 Words | 6 Pages

Through the disclosure of rights and encouragement of legal counsel, Miranda warnings provide a suspect with the opportunity to have legal representation to help protect them from unintentional or involuntary confessions. Legal representatives can provide protection against deceitful interrogation and potential violations of their rights. The second reason I support the argument is that Miranda V. Arizona prevents susceptible individuals from being influenced by forceful or deceitful interrogation tactics that aim to manipulate suspects into providing information or confessions. In many situations, police officers and other law enforcement officials will attempt to lie and manipulate a detainee into providing information.

Read More

Miranda Warning Dbq

883 Words | 4 Pages

The creation of the United States and the colonies that came before, brought about many legal traditions and precedents. Among these legal traditions and precedents, is an essential precedent present in all interrogation related proceedings and court ones—the Miranda warning. When an individual is detained, they may be subjected to an interrogation by designated officials. During an interrogation certain rights are guaranteed to an individual through the provision of the Bill of Rights to prevent self-incrimination and the historical precedent established before it. However, in certain situations, these rights were not always guaranteed as they should’ve been.

Read More

Earl Warren's Supreme Court Cases

1023 Words | 5 Pages

Arizona case argued whether or not “the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination extend to the police interrogation of a suspect” (Oyez). Miranda, after two hours of interrogation, gave a written confession to the police saying that he was guilty. However, the police did confess that they had never informed Miranda of his Fifth Amendment rights, which included a right to an attorney, and because of this, the argument was made that the police had violated Miranda's Fifth Amendment rights. Warren, who was a part of the majority, in this case, decided in favor of Miranda, and that “the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination is available in all settings. Therefore, prosecution may not use statements arising from a custodial interrogation of a suspect unless certain procedural safeguards were in place” (Oyez).

Read More

Why People Wive Their Miranda Rights

376 Words | 2 Pages

When people are suspects under the law, they are entitled to their Miranda rights. A persons Miranda rights entitle them to remain silent, have an attorney present, have an attorney appointed to them if they cannot afford one, and that person is questioned if they understand those rights. It seems that a whopping 80% of suspects waive their Miranda rights. There are no exact reasons, only speculations as to why people waive that right. One that I will focus on is “Why do I need an attorney, if I did not do anything wrong?”

Read More

The Bill Of Rights: Miranda V. Arizona

632 Words | 3 Pages

Having police require to remind arrested citizens of their Constitutional rights is fundamental. Without the Miranda Rights citizens might not know the rights the Bill of Rights grants every citizen.

Read More

Dear Zachary Essay

929 Words | 4 Pages

However, despite these provided liberties, the government also has a responsibility to protect the safety of its citizens. If one person who was accused of a serious crime but does not turn out to be guilty has to spend time in jail awaiting their trial, it is worth it if the lives of other people are saved. Although the rights of the accused are extremely important, human lives should be protected whenever possible: ultimately, the safety of civilians is more

Read More

Civil Liberties Vs. Civil Rights

1251 Words | 6 Pages

SLO: 1 Civil Liberties vs Civil Rights Civil Liberties are individual rights that are acknowledged by the Bill of Rights. Civil Liberties place restraints on what the government can and can’t do. These individual rights cannot be taken away by law. These rights can be found in the Bill of Rights. 2

Read More

Miranda Rights Essay

568 Words | 3 Pages

The Miranda Rights were put in place to make sure any person who is placed under arrest, is informed of their rights. A suspect should only be read their rights when legally required, such as when an official arrest is made, or when the person being questioned is a juvenile. Exigent circumstances can grant an officer the ability to bypass reading of The Miranda Rights to a suspect. Page Break In 1966 the Miranda Rights were established to insure a person who is under arrest is aware of their rights, which is due to the United States Supreme Court case Miranda V. Arizona.

Read More

Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

890 Words | 4 Pages

Arizona, Were his rights violated? It is obvious that Ernesto 's rights were not clear to him. Before his interrogation, Miranda was unaware of his rights and when he made his confession, they were entirely thrown out. In 1965, the court agreed to heir his case. Miranda 's case won 5-4 and a statement was made.

Read More

We The People Chapter 4 Summary

501 Words | 3 Pages

The book describes the Miranda Rights, which are the legal rights that a person under arrest must be informed before they are interrogated by police. If the arresting officer doesn’t inform an arrested person of his Miranda Rights, that person may walk free from any chargers. The book also talks about double jeopardy, double jeopardy is the right that prohibits a person from been tried twice for the same crime. In other words if a person is found innocent and sometime later new evidence surface that can incriminate him with the crime that he is “innocent” he cannot be charged for that same crime. The book also mentions self-incrimination, which is the right that no citizen will have to be a witness against himself.

Read More

Miranda Rights Persuasive Speech

702 Words | 3 Pages

Oh yeah your Miranda rights. These are rights given to you; the free people of the United States, declaring by the Fifth Amendment that while you are being detained by a police officer they have to read your rights to you which is… You have the right to remain silence. Anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. You have the right to an attorney and have the right to have one during interrogation. If you cannot afford one, one will be provided to you by the government expense.

Read More

More about Why Do People Have The Right To Remain Silent

Related Topics

Open Document