ipl-logo

Civil Liberties Vs. Civil Rights

1251 Words6 Pages

SLO: 1 Civil Liberties vs Civil Rights
Civil Liberties are individual rights that are acknowledged by the Bill of Rights.
Civil Liberties place restraints on what the government can and can’t do.These individual rights cannot be taken away by law. These rights can be found in the Bill of Rights.
2 Some of these rights include: the right to free speech, the right to remain silent when being questioned by authorities, the right to privacy, the right to fair trial, the right to be free from unwarranted searches, etc.
1 Civil Rights are rights that the government guarantees equal treatment under the constitution. 3 They protect us from being discriminated against because of our race, sex, etc. They apply in all aspects of regular life from trying …show more content…

Civil Liberties protect everyone from an overbearing government while Civil
Rights protect certain groups or races. Also Civil Rights are based of a democratic government since they represent everyone that lives under that government while Civil
Liberties come from a limited government where the people have momentous power and the government has certain restrictions over its power.
4 In 1833 in the court case of Barron v. Baltimore the court said that the Bill of
Rights applied to the federal government, not to the states. They also said that every
4 American has dual citizenship. Another case was Korematsu v. United States where the court ruled against Korematsu’s rights. The court stated although they are important the court needs to protect the country against espionage especially since it was during a time of “emergency and peril.” I believe that under regular circumstances the court will rule in favor of protecting Civil Rights and Civil Liberties but in times of crisis and war the court will do whatever it has to, to protect the country.
The Terry Stop in my opinion violates a person's rights as they have not actually committed a crime and the officials are just acting on “probable cause”. I’d …show more content…

5 I believe the potential to violate our civil rights or civil liberties is enormous. Any person of power or with authority they can just see a black man and think any number of stereotypes about him. This can lead to the officer seeing him as a potential threat and taking some sort of action that could violate any number of his
6 rights and liberties. Just how it used to happen in the younger days of the nation,
African-Americans were having their right to a fair trial violated. Even to this day there are still some officials thinking that they can do whatever they want with people’s lives by violating every right they so fought hard to aquire. Sometimes the Supreme Court will revert the rulings of these lower courts but more than often they’ll stay with the original ruling or they might not even look at the case.
My thoughts on civil rights and civil liberties are simple I feel as though they worked for people in the past but they aren’t for today's times. I think they’re slowly dismantling and one day the government is going to have to revise to fit today’s times if not it could mean the collapse of the United States government as we know

Show More
Related
716 Words | 3 Pages

Civil Rights means the rights of citizens to political and social freedom and equality. The Emmett Till trial had a huge effect on the African American Civil Rights activist. They felt as though after seeing a young african american boy beaten to death, that proved that not even kids were safe in the south. Civil Rights activist just wanted for all African Americans to be

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

From the failure of the Articles, should the new government, the Constitution, be approved? In 1788, the Constitution was created as the Articles of Confederation wasn’t successful and strong enough for their new government. During that time, a debate went throughout America about the Constitution whether to ratify it or not. Yes, the Constitution should be ratified because a Bill of Rights was promised, no one overpowered (in the government; checks and balances), and it is fair to both citizens and officials. Starting off, a bill of rights was promised which would ensure many things for the citizens.

Read More
1598 Words | 7 Pages

The civil rights are those given by the government and saying they coexist with the natural rights undermines Burke as he says that government exists separately from natural

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

The Bill of Rights is essentially just a document that states our rights as citizens and the 14th Amendment states that, no matter your skin color, sex, or age, everyone is equal

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

Civil rights means everyone should be treated equally no matter their race or color. Many people fought for civil rights, and it is an important part of American history. Everyday black people struggled to get an education. Civil rights made it possible for black people to go to school. Little Rock Nine changed the course of U.S. history.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

Civil liberties are different than Civil Rights. Where Civil Rights are to prevent the government from abusing us by treating the people wrong and unequally. The Civil Liberties are there to limit the government power on the people. It is there to protect our freedom. That is why we have our freedom of speech which protects us people from having the government limit what we say.

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

Chapter three does a good job pointing out that compulsory attendance laws served as an impetus for challenging schools over both their segregationist and exclusionary policies toward students of differing race and ability (Yell, 2016, p. 36). At the time our government was sending a very ambiguous message to students and their families. On one hand, the law of the land dictated that students must attend school, conversely schools continued to exclude students with disabilities. This inherent contradiction let to parent advocacy groups challenging schools for the fair and equal treatment of their children.

Read More
151 Words | 1 Pages

The Civil Rights Acts of 1964 & 1968 were some of the most progressive events in the Civil Rights movement. They gave equal opportunities in housing, employment, schooling and even went as far as to ban segregation in all public places. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 made segregation illegal in public schools and public spaces and made employment discrimination criminal. The Civil Rights Act of 1968 mostly consisted of the Housing Discrimination Act and the Indian Civil Rights Act. They made discrimination in housing matters like renting, selling and buying illegal and established civil rights for Indians and how they would govern themselves.

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

One of the differences between a bill of rights and an amendment is that a bill of rights can exist on its own, while an amendment cannot. An amendment is only an amendment if it is added into a preexisting document or law. A bill of rights is a list of people’s rights, whether it is listed within the main body of a document or within an amendment, such as in The Constitution (Merriam-Webster, 1828). Another difference is that a bill of rights must contain actual rights to be a bill of rights, whereas an amendment can contain any extra information deemed necessary. Both were initially used by Americans in the Constitution to secure the future of American government, but each served a different purpose.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Chapter 4 of the book We the People talks about Civil Liberties, this chapter mainly talks about the Rights that were placed in the Constitution (not in the Bill of Rights), it also talks about the Bill of Rights and it describes the rights protected by the Bill of Rights. It also talks about specific rights that work close together with the Bill of Rights and Amendments rights. One of the first Amendments that is described in great detail is Freedom of Speech and Religion. The first Amendment protects US citizens right to talk about almost any topic in the United States. I said almost any topic because there are some forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment (these forms of speech can be limited or prohibited), some of the forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment are Fighting Words and Hate Speech, Student Speech, Libel and Slander speech.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

This included things like the discrimination of gender, race, color, or national origin. If we didn’t have civil rights, our nation could be a much darker place than it is right now. There would be people of color who were enslaved and didn’t have voting rights or the right to have a job or the right to own any land or money. It would be very different to live in such a

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

Civil rights refers to fighting for equal rights between blacks and whites. It is an important part of history. From time to time, people have been fighting for civil rights for blacks in whites in the mid 1900’s. In fact, Bloody Sunday was probably one of the most important events to have an impact on history for civil rights. Everyday, people struggle to be treated equally and civil rights make it possible for everyone black or white to be treated equally.

Read More
101 Words | 1 Pages

The Civil Rights was the rise of action that enforced the rights for freedom, equality, the fight against discrimination and more. The people during this time were treated unequal and were discouraged so Americans around the country took a stand. Behind this cause was the power of the strong leaders that convinced people to take their side, the right side. The speeches by these leaders took a huge and powerful effect on these individuals by the way they styled their words. This style is called rhetoric.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

Both terms are seen in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, however, the contrast between the two has always been indistinct and are often used interchangeably. Civil liberties are protections against government actions, such as the guarantee of the right to practice whichever religion they please constituted in the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. The government, therefore, cannot interfere in a citizen’s freedom of religion. The First Amendment gives the individual “liberty” from the actions of the government. Civil rights, on the other hand, are positive actions taken by the government to constitute equal conditions for all Americans and is frequently related with the

Read More
1373 Words | 6 Pages

Briefly, civil rights and liberties have always moved together, and their difference is complicated as people tend to use them in interchangeable way. However, their difference is that, civil rights is the equality that people demand for whereas, civil liberty is certain activities that government itself does not have the authority to do (Muller). For example, people should not be discriminated regarding their gender, race etc. is civil right, and the first amendment which says that government cannot establish America as any religious country is civil liberty. 2 So basically, civil rights protect people from discrimination while civil liberties protect the people from power of government.

Read More

More about Civil Liberties Vs. Civil Rights

Related Topics

Open Document