ipl-logo

Why Do We Need To Keep The Supreme Court Essay

1957 Words8 Pages

We Need to Keep The Supreme Court The Way It Is People have started to voice concerns about changing the Supreme Court at the center of the US legal system. While some want term restrictions, others want more justice. But is messing with the highest court a risky move that could mess with the foundations of our democracy? The Supreme Court is referred to as the highest court in the federal judiciary, with the authority to interpret federal law and the Constitution as seen in Article 3 section 1 of the Constitution. In recent years, there have been talks about reforming the Supreme Court. There are many sites wanting change. For instance, the website Demand Justice wrote an article called Reform the Supreme Court and claims “The Supreme Court …show more content…

Congress can at any time change the number of justices as they have done previously, and many people want them to do so. In addition to many people wanting more seats available, many people want term limits to be added because “Term limits would give each president the opportunity to appoint the same number of Supreme Court justices each term, reducing partisan gamesmanship around each confirmation and making the Court more democratically representative” as stated in the article Reform the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court of the United States should not be reformed. Court-packing is only an argument in today’s world because certain political parties are unhappy with cases that are not in their favor. Although implementing term limits might promote turnover and diversity by maintaining the current number of justices, we can not ensure that it will. We need to protect the principles that have defined America for more than 200 years. In recent years, talking about reforming the Supreme Court has become popular. However, in today's world, one of the topics known as court-packing is only a debate because some political parties take issue with rulings that don't go their …show more content…

n.d. “‘Democracy Is at Risk’: Inside the Fight for Supreme Court Reform As the Court Concludes Another Term That Upended Lives, Conservative Justices Are Attracting Criticism for Their Rulings and Their Behavior Away from the Bench.” Accessed April 16, 2024. hlr. n.d. “Confusion and Clarity in the Case for Supreme Court Reform.” Harvard Law Review. Accessed April 16, 2024. harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-137/confusion-and-clarity-in-the-case-for-supreme-court-reform/. “In Op-Ed, Senator Warren Calls for Supreme Court Expansion to Protect Democracy and Restore Independent Judiciary | U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.” 2021. December 15, 2021. www.warren.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/in-op-ed-senator-warren-calls-for-supreme-court-expansion-to-protect-democracy-and-restore-independent-judiciary. “Reform Congress, Not the Court.” 2024. Harvard Law Review. Harvard Law School - Harvard Law School. April 2024. harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-137/reform-congress-not-the-court/. “Reform the Supreme Court - Is Leading the Fight.” n.d. Demand Justice. Accessed April 16, 2024. demandjustice.org/priorities/supreme-court-reform/. “Rep. Johnson Re-Introduces Supreme Court Justice Term Limit Measure to Restore Balance, Legitimacy for SCOTUS.” n.d. Congressman Hank Johnson. Accessed April 16, 2024. hankjohnson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-johnson-re-introduces-supreme-court-justice-term-limit-measure. “Supreme

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Gideon V. Wainwright

1023 Words | 5 Pages

When people think of how government works, unless they’ve taken a government class, they usually think of Congress making laws and the President doing pretty much everything else. No one pays much attention to the Supreme Court unless there is a landmark case or something else to grab the news — like the recent death of Justice Antonin Scalia. But the Supreme Court does much more than you’d think regarding keeping the political machine running like a well-oiled … machine. Through not only interpretation of the law, but also judicial activism, the Supreme Court shows it can have as much influence over the laws of the land as either of the other branches of the federal government. In this paper, I will analyze the decision-making methods of the Court using the cases of Gideon v. Wainwright and Betts v. Brady.

Read More

Summary Of Your Crumbling Way Of Life By Greg Abbott

406 Words | 2 Pages

6. Require a seven-justice super-majority vote for U.S. Supreme Court decisions that invalidate a democratically enacted

Read More

How Did Marshall Use Marbury V Madison As Epochal

756 Words | 4 Pages

The Senate failed to muster enough votes to convict and remove Chase. The precedent thus established was fortunate. From that day to this, no really serious attempt has been made to reshape the Supreme Court by the impeachment weapon. Jefferson’s ill advised attempt at “judge breaking’’ was a reassuring victory for the independence of the judiciary and for the separation of powers among the three branches of the federal government.”

Read More

Brennan Vs Renanquist Analysis

174 Words | 1 Pages

Peter Irons’ Brennan vs. Rehnquist discusses the philosophical differences between Supreme Court Justices William Brennan and William Rehnquist, but on a deeper level, the importance of having a balance of ideas within the Judiciary Branch. Brennan’s ideology, as a lawyer and judge, tended to be more progressive by focusing on the dignity of all people. However, Rehnquist had conservative proclivity and believed that whoever held the majority should subject their own morals upon those in the minority, which is directly at odds with the beliefs of his more liberal counterpart. The author also states that the members of the Supreme Court are selected by publicly elected officials, meaning that the general population of voters hold an important

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Packing The Supreme Court

564 Words | 3 Pages

Samad Quraishi Mr. Mesa US/VA Government Honors 11 January 2023 Prompt: Is "court-packing" an appropriate response to criticisms directed at the United States Supreme Court? Packing the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) is a bad idea. SCOTUS has been the highest court of the land throughout our country's history. They have the power to determine whether a law is Constitutional or not, yet in recent years the court has become overwhelmingly conservative and politicized.

Read More

Stonewall Riots Essay

648 Words | 3 Pages

This is evident since the judicial branch cannot enforce power, it cannot approach matters, but matters have to seek the judiciary, and public opinion influences the court’s decisions to a great extent. When the President and Congress think that

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Supreme Court Justices

219 Words | 1 Pages

What is actually happening is allowing Supreme Court justices to serve for life. An article stated that “by making new appointments less frequent, longer tenure has diminished the abilities of presidents and senators to provide the only form of democratic accountability that is consistent with judicial independence,” (Jr., Stuart Taylor. ). William Douglas, who has set record for Supreme Court tenure (almost 37 years) who has cast the deciding vote, along with Hugo Black who retired at the age of 85 and Thurgood Marshall who retired at the age of 83. “ I’m getting old and falling apart,” Marshall said on his last day (Jr., Stuart Taylor. ). That’s why it is better to bring fresh perspectives, and especially those people who understand the

Read More

Accomplishments Of John Marshall

299 Words | 2 Pages

To ensure an independent Judiciary and to protect judges from partisan

Read More

Supreme Court's Agenda By Vanessa A. Baird: Article Analysis

998 Words | 4 Pages

Although this article is very informative, it still leaves me with a few questions and ideas on what I believe should stem from this study. My first question would be, why does this matter? What is being influenced by the Supreme Court’s agenda other than policy? This is a question that I don’t feel like this article answered and as I mentioned before, I have limited prior knowledge on this topic and will need to research further. Another question I have is directed towards the author, rather than the information.

Read More

Term Limits In The Supreme Court

339 Words | 2 Pages

This shows that term limits in the Supreme Court became more important. For example, if they have more mature members, they would understand the law, and would understand the politics and their decisions on the society. Mr. Ingraham stated

Read More

Justice Thurgood Marshall Analysis

1324 Words | 6 Pages

Justice Thurgood Marshall Response Justice Thurgood Marshall said in his “Reflections on the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution”, “I do not believe the meaning of the Constitution was forever ‘fixed’ at the Philadelphia Convention. Nor do I find the wisdom, foresight, and sense of justice exhibited by the framers particularly profound. To the contrary, the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war, and momentous social transformation to attain the system of constitutional government and its respect for the individual freedoms and human rights, that we hold as fundamental as today” (Marshall). In this passage of his essay, Judge Marshall is critical of the government that is

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Tort Reform

1924 Words | 8 Pages

In today’s society, tort reform remains an exceedingly controversial topic. There are some individuals who argue that tort reform bills should be stricter, while others argue that tort reform bills should be ruled in favor of citizens. Although the debate continues on in society, Congress has full authority in deciding which bills it wants to pass. Recently in an effort to make changes in our civil justice system, Republicans in the House of Representatives have introduced four bills: The Innocent Party Protection Act (HR 725), The Fairness in Class Action in Litigation Act (HR 985), Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act (HR 720), and Protecting Access to Care Act (HR 1215). Each of the reform bills introduced has received both support and opposition

Read More

Scalia Argumentative Essay

570 Words | 3 Pages

It is obvious that both conservatives and liberals want to dominate the Supreme Court of United States. In this panel discussion, I just realized that our President and

Read More

Judicial Review Pros And Cons

741 Words | 3 Pages

Robert Isenhour Federal Government 110 10/10/17 Judicial Review Judicial Review had been obsolete until 1803 when the need for it arose in the case of Marbury vs. Madison, where it was then found to become a new component to the Judicial Branch. I am here to discuss why judicial review is and shall remain a doctrine commonly used in constitutional law. Judicial Review is the power for courts to review other government branches to determine the validity of its actions whether it be constitutional or unconstitutional. These ‘acts’ can be described as legislation passed by congress, presidential orders and actions, or all state and local governmental actions.

Read More

Why The Judicial Branch Is The Most Powerful

478 Words | 2 Pages

Hana Kim Professor Yvonne Wollenberg Law and Politics 106 7 October 2015 Title In the United States government, there are three branches called the legislative, executive, and judicial branch. Out of these three, the judicial branch is the most powerful. The judicial branch is made up of the Supreme Court, the court with the most power in the country, and other federal courts that are lower in the system; the purpose of this branch is to look over laws and make sure they are constitutional and reasonable.

Read More

More about Why Do We Need To Keep The Supreme Court Essay

Open Document