ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Tort Reform

1924 Words8 Pages

In today’s society, tort reform remains an exceedingly controversial topic. There are some individuals who argue that tort reform bills should be stricter, while others argue that tort reform bills should be ruled in favor of citizens. Although the debate continues on in society, Congress has full authority in deciding which bills it wants to pass. Recently in an effort to make changes in our civil justice system, Republicans in the House of Representatives have introduced four bills: The Innocent Party Protection Act (HR 725), The Fairness in Class Action in Litigation Act (HR 985), Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act (HR 720), and Protecting Access to Care Act (HR 1215). Each of the reform bills introduced has received both support and opposition …show more content…

In an effort to impede the filing of flippant lawsuits, the House of Representatives introduced the Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act. This act improves Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in refining attorney liability by reinstalling compulsory deterrents for filing frivolous cases. In addition, this act removes “Rule 11’s “safe harbor” provision that currently allows parties and their attorneys to avoid sanctions for making frivolous claims by withdrawing claims after a motion for sanctions has been filed” (govtrack.us). While this bill has not been amended since it was introduced, it was passed “in an effort to protect individuals and businesses from unnecessary legal costs” (Smith, 2017). While this bill was passed with the intention to safeguard individuals from burdening legal costs, there are many agencies that both support and defend this act, with similar arguments. For example, the National Federation of Independent Business supports this legislation because it “significantly helps to reduce the filing of frivolous lawsuits and motions by amending Rule 11 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure” (Duggan, 2017). Supporters argue that Rule 11’s effectiveness in preventing frivolous lawsuits has diminished and that the “safe harbor” took the incentive away in filing flippant cases, while victims still encounter legal …show more content…

One such agency is the American Bar Association, which argues that, “H.R. 720 seeks to amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by rolling back critical improvements made to the Rule in 1993” (Susan, 2017). Opponents argue that there is no research to prove that frivolous cases are increasing and that the current legislation, Rule 11 is ineffective. Also, there is a risk that the new changes would hinder the justice department with an increase in the amount of lawsuits being filed, which could cause delays and increase courts cost. Based on my analysis for both sides of the argument, I believe that this legislation, H.R. 720 should not be brought forward. While the supporters argue that this act could help to prevent the filing of frivolous lawsuits, they do not indicate by what rate. Furthermore, I agree with the argument that this legislation could increase the amount of cases being filed, perhaps in an attempt to void this act. After reading this legislation, it came to my mind, how do we define what a frivolous lawsuit is. Those who are allowed to define it, may not have the same ideology as others, which in the long run may prevent individuals from voicing their concerns. In addition, I also believe that what might be said to be a frivolous lawsuit now, may not be frivolous in the end, as was the case in Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants,

Show More
Related

United States V. Lawson Case Study

726 Words | 3 Pages

The case United States v. Lawson, 2009 WL 1916063 (Ky. 2009) deals extensively with FRE Rule 404(b). In the case four different items of evidence are viewed for admissibility under Rule 404. The case focuses on three co-defendants who are charged with five counts of bribery conspiracy and three counts of conspiracy on construction or repair of state roads and highways. The motion viewed focuses on Nighbert, a co-defendant, and his objections to admitting certain evidence against him under Rule 404(b). The four items are: an FBI report of an alleged conversation Nighbert had with the mayor regarding his son, failed disclosure on financial forms of his ownership of a company, an FBI interview concerning Kentucky road contracts and Nighbert, and a newspaper article regarding the defendant’s property and nearby construction.

Read More

Tennessee Vs Garner Case Study

543 Words | 3 Pages

Garner’s father brought a suit in 1983 arguing that his son’s fourth, fifth ,sixth, eighth, and fourteenth amendments right were violated. The District court found that Hymon’s use of DF was in good standing, Court of Appeals reversed it stating the facts did not justify the use of DF. Issue

Read More

Pros And Cons Of 4th Amendment

516 Words | 3 Pages

III. THE COURT SHOULD PROVIDE VICTIMS OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION A FOURTH AMENDMENT REMEDY AS A MATTER OF GOOD PUBLIC POLICY The Fourth Amendment is well-suited to ground Section 1983 claims by individuals seeking remedies for extended pre-trial detention due to police misconduct and improper probable cause. As the plurality opinion in Albright noted, “[t]he Framers considered the matter of pretrial deprivations of liberty and drafted the Fourth Amendment to address it….We

Read More

Supreme Court's Agenda By Vanessa A. Baird: Article Analysis

998 Words | 4 Pages

Baird questions if interest groups have the power to influence litigation patterns, and believes that if they do, the conditions of the situation will determine if they decide to further engage in litigation. I felt that this was something important to note considering the author establishes that litigation essentially creates the agenda of the Supreme Court, in an indirect manner of sort. In other words, litigation and what seems to be viewed as “policy priorities” have a way of creating an agenda based on each other. The author approaches this by implying that litigation seeks the information provided by policy priorities. On the other hand, it seems as if policy priorities are based on the cases brought before the court, which are a result of litigation.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The American Bar Association

475 Words | 2 Pages

A proposed determination working its way up the American Bar Association sounds sufficiently harmless, if not totally decipherable. It requires the reception of "administrative targets for the procurement of legitimate administrations" that would "distinguish and actualize regulations identified with lawful administrations past the conventional regulation of the lawful calling." Be that as it may, those words are mixing alert among some nearby bar bunches, which say it represents a grave risk to their calling. How's that you might inquire?

Read More

For Justice Stalia Pros And Cons

927 Words | 4 Pages

Over Justice Scalia’s protests, the holding in Windsor indicates that the Court views adverseness as a prudential concern. As alluded to earlier in this paper, there are serious consequences if a threshold element is considered a constitutional standard versus a prudential concern. If it is prudential, then Congress has the authority to statutorily overrule the Court’s decision. However, if the threshold element stems from the United States Constitution, then only a Constitutional Amendment will change the Court’s interpretation.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of American Civil Liberties

892 Words | 4 Pages

The support for DeLauro-Frankel-Scott comes from the ACLU, which provides campaign support to and entertains members of the Committee on Appropriations and the Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions in order to help persuade them to approve of and advocate for this amendment. In return, if the committee members feel sufficiently compensated, they will pass the amendment through Congress and pass the ACLU’s proposed legislation. However, the ACLU still needs to control how this legislation is implemented, so it must give first information on the amendment and later monetary support for any regulations or standards established by the EEOC and Department of Labor. Supporting these standards monetarily ensures that the ACLU has a say in how the law is interpreted and implemented by the bureaucracies. Without this support, these groups could twist the wording in the legislation and carry it out in a way that is detrimental to the goals of the ACLU.

Read More

The Central Park 5, 12 Angry Men And The Case Of Archie Williams

1667 Words | 7 Pages

“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.” - Desmond Tutu The Judicial system is unfair as personal biases within the system can largely affect the outcome of any case, as seen in “The Central Park 5”, “12 Angry Men”, and The case of Archie Williams. These instances of prejudice and bias are the reason why many individuals are falsely convicted in the courtroom. There is estimated to be around 1000 wrongful convictions happening every year in the United States. While some may argue that these wrongful convictions only account for 5% of convictions, the Justice system still imprisons innocent people and shames them for crimes they didn’t commit.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Private Defense

755 Words | 4 Pages

Justice is supposed to be blind. However, that blindness comes at a price that not everyone can afford. The public defense system is negatively affecting indigent criminal defendants who cannot afford an attorney. The Public Defender's office states that many of these attorneys have insufficient resources and inadequate oversight, which makes it difficult for attorneys to represent these criminal defendants. Due to the fact that there are limited resources available for indigent criminal defendants, many will suffer injustice at the hands of the attorneys who are supposed to ensure defendants’ constitutional rights to a fair trial, and to due process and equal protection under the law.

Read More

Qualified Immunity Essay

725 Words | 3 Pages

It makes it clear that a accidents and injuries caused during a high speed pursue due to the offender’s own fault does not break the fourteenth amendment. It also shows how qualified immunity can help law enforcement. Qualified immunity was able to help Smith get out of being sued due to the accident caused by the high speed pursue that he was involved in. It causes a positive impact on law enforcement as it allows law enforcement to be free of the fear of being sued for events that they never thought of or thought would ever happen. In this case, Smith was involved in a accident that he could not see coming at the time.

Read More

Moral Skepticism Vs Natural Law

1238 Words | 5 Pages

In terms of forward-looking adjudication, significant systemic consequences were likely had Ms. Buck won the case. To find for Ms. Buck, the Court would likely have expanded the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses. Expansion of due process would have been completely unreasonable for Holmes, as it would have meant extending “substantive due process,” after famously dissenting from ¨Lochner. Finally, Posner asserts, “Legal pragmatists are more sympathetic to rhetoric.”

Read More

Structural Injustice In Criminal Justice

1327 Words | 6 Pages

”$. Someone might argue that the prosecutor is doing nothing more than his/her job and that they are following the guidelines laid out for him/her by the government. While part of that is true, an individual’s implicit biases could cause them to exercise their discretion in a way that is unjust and cruel. That is why law-makers must also step up and propose legislation that

Read More

Judicial Reform In The Supreme Court

1346 Words | 6 Pages

Judicial Reform in the United States Supreme Court Introduction: Being well known as the “least accountable branch of the government”, it is more than apparent that the time for reform has come in the Supreme Court. While once withholding great reputations, with issues concerning Justices few and far between, it has been noted in previous years that allegations associated with Supreme Court Justices have been more common. The answer for the increasing problematics is simple: the Justices have grown comfortable. Therefore, it is crucial for the good of the nation that our Justices understand that they too are held accountable by the same laws laid out in the United States Constitution that adhere to the very people they are trusted in governing.

Read More

Death Penalty Argumentative Analysis

1323 Words | 6 Pages

This provides a greater degree of fairness for the defendant” (par. 4). Several other laws like the one mentioned have been put in place as a precaution to wrongly accusing the defendant and to ensure a fair

Read More

The Appeals Process

963 Words | 4 Pages

When all the information from multiple sources is put together, it can easily be concluded that the United States appeals process is ineffective in criminal cases. Since the United States appeals process is ineffective in criminal cases, the question arises on how do American citizens improve the appeals process? Some of the reasons the current appeals process is ineffective is because appeals are often denied,

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Tort Reform

Open Document