If kids are being paid money for good grades, does this and other rewards actually help them in any way? Schools and parents these days are paying or giving opportunities and rewards to those that do well academically in school. Many favor the rewards, but others may also disagree. Students have noticed that when their parents go to work, they receive money in return for their hard work. Parents that pay their child for their above average grades say that since going to school is their kid’s “job,” their kid should literally be “paid” or rewarded as well for their hard work in school. This may have its benefits, but there are downsides too. When students are being paid money for good grades, they do not understand the main purpose of learning by losing their natural enthusiasm, not understanding or realizing the real “reward,” and not feeling the real satisfaction from their accomplishments.
Regarding this topic, a student will most likely lose their natural enthusiasm for learning if they are being paid for higher grades. Psychologists Bob Brooks and Sam Goldstein argue that, “A child’s natural enthusiasm for learning may
…show more content…
Psychologists Bob Brooks and Sam Goldstein also argue that, “It doesn’t really teach kids the reward of learning for learning’s sake.” To elaborate, they are saying that cash incentives may have been or are being given with good intentions, but the effects of it are not as great as they intend to be or do. Stating that, “They clearly work against the continued development of a child’s intrinsic (innate) motivation,” proves a point. An effect of this may be how students don’t realize the “sheer pleasure of learning,” and are “eclipsed” by rewards. Some parents mention that kids should only receive rewards for a “true” achievement. Clearly, cash incentives and rewards don’t really teach kids the reward of learning for learning’s