Why Is Charlemagne A Barbaric Slaughterer Or A Statesman

980 Words4 Pages

Historians and Academics of the 21st century each have different opinions on whether Charlemagne was a barbaric slaughterer or a statesman. One modern scholar would defend their opinion in saying that Charlemagne was a brutal murderer who killed thousands of innocent children, families and caused a catastrophe. An opposing side might hold the belief that Charlemagne was a great emperor who unified Western Europe and created innovations that further progressed civilization. Charlemagne, Father of Europe, was a statesman whose intention was to improve the state with his reforms.

In 476 AD, the Western Roman Empire had lost the strength needed to effectively manage a large empire. Charlemagne’s reign had strengthened the Western part of the Roman …show more content…

Not only has Charlemagne created laws but he has also “reformed the calendar, giving the months names which are suggestive of the progress in farming techniques.” . His calendar reformation helped facilitate agricultural industry in terms of the way they practice crop …show more content…

The economic changes that were implemented by Charles have standardized Western Civilization’s currency and allowed for more work opportunities.

Charles, Christian king, believed that the right way of handling legislative measures is the fair way, “One of Charlemagne’s constant concerns was the standardization of the weights and measures in use in the empire. He wanted to guarantee that no one was defrauded, in accordance with the biblical admonition against anyone who uses “divers weight, and divers measures”. This preoccupation with order, stability and harmony, which appears to dominate Charlemagne’s legislation, thus produced its effects in the market