2.4.4.2. John Stuart Mill About Bentham’s influences on him, John Stuart Mill wrote in his Autobiography: "It gave unity to my conceptions of things. I now had opinions; a creed, a doctrine, a philosophy; in one among the best senses of the word, a religion; the inculcation and diffusion of which could be made the principal outward purpose of a life", meanwhile he had a critical view on Bentham's notions. Mill did not accept Bentham’s idea about the human as an only self-interested being. Instead, he assumed that the human being naturally consists of the desire of perfection and sympathy for his/her fellow. In his Utilitarianism, he tried to justify the 'utilitarian principle' as the foundation of the moral conceptions - and in general the morality. Mill considered good (and just) as happiness and evil (and unjust) as unhappiness. Also, such as the majority of the Utilitarians, he assumed that the greater happiness is what that belongs to the greatest number of people. As the result, he used the …show more content…
The crime makes people unhappy. So, it is bad. 2. The most happiness will be given to the majority of people by punishing the criminal. So, the punishment is good. Thus, in order to balance the good over evil and make the people happy, the punishment must be practiced to the crime. In addition, Mill argued that this theory is derived from the humans' social nature, since people never desire anything but happiness. Having this in mind, he assumed any people's achievement of goals and ends - such as virtuous living - as part of their happiness. Separating his own theory from Bentham’s, Mill argued that since the quality cannot be quantified, the quantitative calculus is unreasonable. Thus, the quality of happiness is more important than the quantity. That is, one should qualify the action not to count it. By this, the utilitarianism tries to achieve the 'highest pleasures' for the most amount of