ipl-logo

Why Is John Stuart Mill Considered Good

644 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Mill's definition of happiness

2.4.4.2. John Stuart Mill About Bentham’s influences on him, John Stuart Mill wrote in his Autobiography: "It gave unity to my conceptions of things. I now had opinions; a creed, a doctrine, a philosophy; in one among the best senses of the word, a religion; the inculcation and diffusion of which could be made the principal outward purpose of a life", meanwhile he had a critical view on Bentham's notions. Mill did not accept Bentham’s idea about the human as an only self-interested being. Instead, he assumed that the human being naturally consists of the desire of perfection and sympathy for his/her fellow. In his Utilitarianism, he tried to justify the 'utilitarian principle' as the foundation of the moral conceptions - and in general the morality. Mill considered good (and just) as happiness and evil (and unjust) as unhappiness. Also, such as the majority of the Utilitarians, he assumed that the greater happiness is what that belongs to the greatest number of people. As the result, he used the …show more content…

The crime makes people unhappy. So, it is bad. 2. The most happiness will be given to the majority of people by punishing the criminal. So, the punishment is good. Thus, in order to balance the good over evil and make the people happy, the punishment must be practiced to the crime. In addition, Mill argued that this theory is derived from the humans' social nature, since people never desire anything but happiness. Having this in mind, he assumed any people's achievement of goals and ends - such as virtuous living - as part of their happiness. Separating his own theory from Bentham’s, Mill argued that since the quality cannot be quantified, the quantitative calculus is unreasonable. Thus, the quality of happiness is more important than the quantity. That is, one should qualify the action not to count it. By this, the utilitarianism tries to achieve the 'highest pleasures' for the most amount of

Show More
Related
1953 Words | 8 Pages

He believes that the pleasure or pain a person feels is directly related to whether or not the action was right or wrong (Bentham, 39). This means that an action is right when it causes the greatest pleasure for the person or group of people who are involved. If there is a group of people and a certain action would benefit the majority of them for good, then it would be considered to be the right action. On the other hand, if the action does not benefit the majority and only benefits a few, then it would be considered to be wrong. The ultimate goal of this theory is to bring happiness to those involved and to also prevent evil and unhappiness within the group (Bentham, 39).

Read More
240 Words | 1 Pages

In Defense of Utilitarianism, J.S. Mill In the excerpt from John Stuart Mill’s book, Utilitarianism, Mill defends the utilitarian theory against three different objections. The first, and strongest opposition to utilitarianism was the accusation that the emphasis on the pursuit of pleasure makes utilitarianism “a doctrine worthy of swine.” This was my favorite argument because Mill defended it so well stating that there are varying degrees of pleasure. He refers to them as “high” and “low” pleasures, which I do agree with.

Read More
332 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout time, it is said that happiness and having good character are the goals of ones life. This was especially true for Aristotle around the Renaissance period as well as John Stuart Mill in the 17th century. Equally these philosophers have similar views of happiness and character morality with very distinct ideals of what it is that constitutes happiness and the relation of character to morality. To Mill and Aristotle, they both agree humans are the only species capable of moral reason, and to thus have a higher capacity for happiness than oher animals. This parallels John Stuart Mills belief that a “beast’s pleasures do not satisfy a human being’s concept of happiness.

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

Based on "Annie's Box," -- a biography penned by Charles Darwin's great-great-grandson Randal Keynes, using personal letters and diaries of the Darwin family-- "Creation" takes a unique and inside look at Darwin, his family and his love for his deeply religious wife, Torn between faith and science, Darwin struggles to finish his legendary book "On the Origin of Species," which goes on to become the foundation for evolutionary biology. "Creation" is a film about the way this disagreement played out in Darwin's marriage. Charles and Emma were married from 1830 until his death in 1882. They had 10 children, seven of whom survived to beget descendants who even today have reunions. They loved one another greatly.

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

We should be open to ideas and scrutinize them instead of repressing them in order to support them or find out errors in the ideas. In either case, truth prevails. His critiques start with the rejection of rights and the principle that if you get rid of rights, you get rid of everything. Along with his godfather, Jeremy Bentham, they viewed rights as "non-sense" rights. Mill said that a right requires an external body and either God or a state that gave you those

Read More
1384 Words | 6 Pages

John Stuart Mill was a philosopher, political economist and civil servant in the 19th century . Mill is a Liberalist, which means that he believed that the government should not influence our personal choices as equal citizens of a society. John Mill was also a Utilitarian,

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

John Stuart Mill was a pioneer in liberalism, combining his knowledge of 18th century concepts with the emerging 19th century romanticism concepts (1). Born in 1806, Mill was educated by his father, a disciplinarian who enforced his beliefs onto Mill. Along with philosopher Jeremy Bentham, they encouraged Mill in their liberal beliefs (3). He studied Latin and Greek from the early age of 8 which progressed to his studies in political economy, logic and calculus as a teenager (1). Mill eventually suffered a breakdown at a young age, making him reexamine his life purpose and the principles taught to him (2).

Read More
1599 Words | 7 Pages

Lastly, Mill states that justice is actually very essential in Utilitarianism, although not readily apparent, and

Read More
414 Words | 2 Pages

John Stuart Mill was a British philosopher known as “the most influential English speaking philosopher of the nineteenth century.” Mill was a key component in developing Jeremy Bentham’s theory of utilitarianism, which is one of the most significant concepts in moral and political philosophy. One portion of utilitarianism that Mill is responsible for developing is that of the hierarchy of pleasures. When looking at Mill’s hierarchy the distinction between the quality and quantity of pleasures play a large role in his theory. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism still remains the classic defense of the view that we should try to aim at maximizing the welfare and happiness of all creatures alike.

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

I will agree with Mill and argue that higher pleasures are better than lower pleasures. In Mill’s essay, he defines Utilitarianism: ‘’actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure’’ (Mill, 7). Therefore, Utilitarianism according to Mill considers actions to be right or wrong based on whether or not they make humans happy.

Read More
1734 Words | 7 Pages

Intro: John Stuart Mill obtained many intellectual foundations from Aristotle that better informed his own political and philosophical interpretations. Mill goes to great length discussing the nature of liberty within society and the importance of individuality and progression, in On Liberty, taking modern stances on Aristotelian assertions. Aristotle spends ample time describing how to acquire virtue and achieve happiness, focusing on conservative moral appeals within a political realm. Mill and Aristotle share similar perspectives on the importance of diversity and the dangers the tyranny of the majority imposes on society, furthermore they synonymously endeavor to define the best laws for the state. While Mill and Aristotle come to similar conclusions on these subjects,

Read More
1261 Words | 6 Pages

This means that human beings are allowed to engage in evil activities so long as they will finally attain their goals in life. It should be understood that the evil deeds involved have far-reaching consequences that are suffered by some members of the society and thus this is totally unacceptable. It would have been good if the explanation is specific to indicate that human beings are only allowed to choose between the acceptable deeds in the society in all their efforts to make their lives successful. This is the only way to make sure that rights of all members of the community are taken care of and respected are required. This is also a good way to enhance co-existence within a society to make sure that conflicts are always

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

It was not until Mill’s late teens that he began to study Jeremy Bentham and his utilitarianism theory. “Reading Bentham satisfied Mill’s cravings for scientific precision and gave him a new way of looking at social intercourse” (Buchholz 97). Mill became so intrigued with Bentham that he decided to preach the Benthamite gospel in the Westminster Review, a publication started by his father and Jeremy Bentham. Mill’s views soon changed as he grew older. It is said that Mill had a mid-life crisis at the age of twenty because he took the Bentamite precision too far and actually forgot the ultimate goal of Utilitarianism in the first place, happiness.

Read More
1413 Words | 6 Pages

In a critique of both the works, the paper adopts the Aristotelian thought citing that actions of human aims to fulfill goodness, which arguably is the happiness, one that arises from virtues practiced out of habit. Both the philosophers weigh in heavily on the role of happiness in the day to day lifestyles of humans. Adopting a sharp critic to the conventional principles of utility, Mill recognizes that happiness, as opposed to pleasure has a wider space in human attainments. He goes in deeper to explore the levels of pleasure

Read More
1564 Words | 7 Pages

John Stuart Mill, at the very beginning of chapter 2 entitled “what is utilitarianism”. starts off by explaining to the readers what utility is, Utility is defined as pleasure itself, and the absence of pain. This leads us to another name for utility which is the greatest happiness principle. Mill claims that “actions are right in proportions as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” “By Happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain, by happiness, pain and the privation of pleasure”.

Read More

More about Why Is John Stuart Mill Considered Good

Related Topics

Open Document