ipl-logo

Why Is The Marbury V. Madison Case Important

881 Words4 Pages

The Marbury v. Madison case is an important Supreme Court landmark case in the United States history. In the 1800’s election the Federalists were in power and has the majority in Congress and John Adams won the presidential election. This changed due to the result of the next election, the anti-federalist party won, Thomas Jefferson became president and the Federalist party incumbents were about to lose their seats in Congress. To ensure that the Federalist Party had control over at least one branch of the government John Adams passed Judiciary Act of 1801. This act made the judicial branch of government have equal power to the Legislative and Executive branch. The only problem was the Judiciary Act was passed posthaste. John Adams was in his …show more content…

However, due to the haste and the change in power John Marshall left office before delivering seventeen appointment, three of which were for the justices of peace
Infuriated by Adam’s resourceful appointments, Thomas Jefferson ordered the new secretary of state, James Madison, to not convey the remaining appointments left on his desk by Marshall. This made three justices of the peace, including William Marbury, seek the writ of mandamus. The writ of Mandamus is a court order to a lower officer of the government to execute their official assignments. The Writ of Mandamus was filed against James Madison to compel him to convey the appointments irrespective of the order from the President, Thomas Jefferson. The case was presented to the Supreme Court however, it was difficult to come to a ruling without overstepping the constitution guidelines. The Court was faced with some questions: which was if Marbury was appropriate for the position he was demanding to get if He did get the appointment how would grant him the …show more content…

However, another reason the case was interesting because of Justice Marshall, he was the reason the case occurred in the first place and if he disregards the writ of mandamus, it will make the Supreme Court weak thereby increasing the strength of the Executive and Legislative branches of government. Although the court could not help Marbury get his appointment using the writ of mandamus it was able to enact a judicial review. This judicial review enacted by John Marshall had various effects. It helped integrate a balanced system of checks and balance of each branch of the government even with a separation of the power system in place. But these open a loophole for other branches to interpret the constitution using the excuse of checking and balancing the judicial system. Still, the case of Marbury V. Madison gave the Supreme Court power of judicial review and the idea that the Supreme Court was the overall authority over all matters pertaining to the constitution. Although, this review also suppressed the states’ power to review the

Show More
Related
284 Words | 2 Pages

The presidential election of 1800 might have just been one of the most controversial in our nation's history. Federalists President John Adams fought for reelection but it became clear that the Anti-Federalists, led by Democratic-Republican and Vice President Thomas Jefferson, would take the office. Meanwhile in an effort to preserve the influence of the party, the federalist-led congress pass the judiciary act of 1801 which reorganized the federal judiciary, and the District of Columbia organic Act, both of which created dozens of new judgeships and justice ships. Marbury had been lawfully appointed and confirmed as justice of the peace and therefore had a right to his commision. Marshall went on to say that Marbury was entitled to redress

Read More
281 Words | 2 Pages

In 1800, the presidential election between Adams and Jefferson was a tie, and the government almost broke down. The Supreme Court had no clear purpose or power no one had even thought to build it a courtroom in the new capital city. The book tells the thrilling story of Marbury v. Madison, through which he empowered the Supreme Court and transformed the idea of the separation of powers into a working blueprint for our modern state (The Great Decision). Marbury v. Madison was certainly an integral part of this early stage in American history, but the authors seem to focus more on the actions of Jefferson, Adams, and Marshall. When President Thomas Jefferson took workplace as third president of the U.S., it painted the transfer of powerfulness

Read More
1007 Words | 5 Pages

Marbury Vs Madison establishing Judicial Review allowed the Federalists to maintain checks and balances on the Democratic Republican-controlled Legislative and Executive branches. McCulloch Vs Maryland, establishing that Federal institutions could not be taxed by state law allowed the government to increase its own wealth. Gibbons Vs Ogden established that federal licenses outlawed state-granted monopolies and allowed the government uninterrupted trading power for domestic economics. All these helped move the Federalist agenda of increasing power in the central

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

What was President John Adams goal before he ended his presidency? The Organic Act, this act was perfect it was to ensure that though John Adams was not going to be president anymore he would still have a majority of federalist become dominate and have federalist ideologies pretty much mandate the federal judiciary. He took action and choose forty-two justices of the peace and sixteen circuit court justices for the District of Columbia, but his plan later failed after the documents were not delivered on time and new president Thomas Jefferson choose not to submit the completed documents. William Marbury one of the recipients that was chosen by John Adams, refuse to accept Jefferson’s decision and took matters into his own hands. The facts of the case were vividly sought out, Marbury was to be appointed as justice of peace and his paperwork was completed and ready to be submitted before he could take office.

Read More
288 Words | 2 Pages

In 1803, Thomas Jefferson was President of the United States of America and James Madison was Vice President. In the case Marbury vs. Madison, President Jefferson commanded Madison to fire Judge William Marbury, whom was previously appointed by President John Adams as he was leaving office, along with several other judges. Marbury later sued Madison citing the Judiciary Act of 1798. This act allowed the supreme court to review cases brought against a federal official. William Marbury was a federalist which meant he was in the same political party as Alexander Hamilton and John Adams.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

There were disputes between Thomas Jefferson, who was a Republic, and John Adam, a Federalists once Jefferson beat Adams in the election of 1801. President John Adams, in an attempt to keep Federalist in control, appointed about forty justices of the peace and sixteen other judges. He wanted to try and keep the Federalists in

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

He expanded the power of the Supreme Court by declaring that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and that the Supreme Court Justices were the final deciders. In the Marbury vs. Madison case, Marshall wrote "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” John Marshall was clearly in favor of judicial power, and believed that the Supreme Court should have the final say in cases involving an interpretation of the Constitution. While establishing this, he kept the separation of powers in mind, as he wanted equal representation among the Judicial, Executive, and Legislative branches. In the Marbury vs. Madison, John Marshall declared that the Judicial Branch could not force Madison to deliver the commission.

Read More
633 Words | 3 Pages

Adam waited until the last hour of being president to appointment a new judge. This mark the first problem (constitutional separation of power) for the Supreme Court case cause Marbury V. Madison in 1803 (page 58). Adam and Congress create a new court system for the capital of Washington D.C... William Marbury was appointment (by Adam) to be the justice of peace. On Adam last night of being the president, he delivered the contract to Marbury right before midnight.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

In Marbury v. Madison (1803) it was announced by the Supreme Court for the very first time, that if an act was deemed inconsistent with the constitution then the court was allowed to declare the act void. Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, James Madison, denied William Marbury of his commission. President John Adams appointed William Marbury the justice of peace for the District of Columbia during his last day in office. Madison denied Marbury of this commission because he believed that because it was not issued before the termination of Adams presidency, that it was invalid. Marbury himself started a petition, along with three others who were in a similar situation.

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

However, there are a couple of people that were involved in the case besides William Marbury and president John Adams. For instance, the Supreme Court Justice who took the case, and ultimately decided the ruling, was Chief Justice John Marshall who, writing for a unanimous court, denied the petition and refused to issue the writ of mandamus that William Marbury and three other similarly situated appointees, delivered to Chief Justice John Marshall. One other person who was included in this court case was the new President who replaced John Adams on March 4, 1801, Thomas Jefferson. He was included in the case because he had ordered that the four remaining commissions be

Read More
157 Words | 1 Pages

Marbury v. Madison is important in the American political system. Back in 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the majority opinion. Marshall supported a strong national government. He ruled that the Court could not order Madison to give Marbury the commission because the Judiciary Act of 1789. This marked as the first time the Supreme Court declared that a law passed

Read More
108 Words | 1 Pages

It was also ruled that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unlawful and gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

Marbury v. Madison is a landmark case in which the Court declared a Congressional act unconstitutional, which is now called judicial review. This case and the decision of it helped define the checks and balance system of the government. In 1803 Paterson was involved in a carriage accident while on circuit court duty. He never fully recovered from the accident and died at his daughter’s home in Albany, New York at the age of 61.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

The Necessary and Proper Clause was the subject of a rather heated debated between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton argued that the clause should be read broadly so as to exercise a broad range of many implied powers. Conversely, Jefferson argued that “necessary” was actually a restrictive adjective and what it really meant was essential. Hamilton’s interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause was more flexible and made for a strong national government, whereas Jefferson’s narrower interpretation would help strengthen States’ Rights. The debate between the Secretary of Treasury and the Secretary of State came to a head in the landmark case, McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court at the time was Chief Justice John Marshall, and he declared that this whole process of delivering commissions for judges, the Judiciary Act, was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court declared this act illegal, because it gave the Supreme Court a power that they were forbidden to have. This is when the first law was declared unconstitutional and judicial review came into

Read More

More about Why Is The Marbury V. Madison Case Important

Related Topics

Open Document