Why is the O.J simpson case so controversial first i’m going to tell you a little bit about the case so you get a good insight on what happend, then i’m going to talk about the evidence in the case and my thoughts around the trial. The O.J. Simpson case is on of the most controversial lawsuit in modern history. O.J. Simpson was tried on two counts of murder for the June 12, 1994, deaths of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and restaurant waiter Ronald Goldman. The trial began January 24, 1995 and lasted for 134 days. Los Angeles Police department with Christopher Darden argued that Simpson killed his ex-wife in a jealous rage. The prosecution opened its case by playing a 9-1-1 call from Nicole Brown Simpson on January 1, 1989. As you heard She expressed fear that Simpson would physically …show more content…
LAPD thought that would or could make them blind for all the evidence. When your convincing a jury it’s all about having the best story to tell. Said Robert Shapiro, the main lawyer from “the dreamteam” Which was what they called the Simpson team. Simpson had hired nine great lawyers to help him in the case. Making a story the jury would hear was what The dream team had in mind, and to get sympathy he used his rase as an advantage and as a tool. The suppression of the black community was in his trial used as a lot and became their main argument. The Simpsons case was viewed as an controversial trial based on several reasons. The main reason was the rase issues in the case. Mark Fuhrman was a discussed police officer cus of his racism behavior. He had many accusers for hitting and mistreating black peoples. Mark was one of the police officers that found the two bodies outside of Nickole’s house. Many believe that Mark Fuhrman places the evidence that pointed at O.J. Simpson on the crime
It was because of Simpson's defense team, the jury rendered Simpson as not guilty; there was reasonable doubt in the DNA evidence in the case, and racial afflictions present. Methods, Investigation, and Indictment Simpson was recently divorced from Nicole and had a history of physical abuse and jealousy issues. In the trial Darden told the jurors, "If he couldn't have her, he didn't want anybody else to have her" (Linder, 2000). Simpson was over possessive, and was an extremist. There were numerous incidents that Simpson went to the extreme, in a call Nicole dialed to 911 in Oct. 25 1993, she said “My ex-husband has just broken into my house and he's ranting and raving outside the
In 1995, former NFL player O.J. Simpson was put on trial for the murder of his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. O.J. Simpson’s trial is believed to be one of the most popular and controversial trials to ever take place in the Los Angeles Superior Court. O.J. was found not guilty by the verdict and was released to go on and live his life. But my belief is, O.J. should have been found guilty, because of all the of the evidence that was found at the scene and later on in the investigation they discovered more evidence. Also because of the book that Nicole’s brothers published later after her death.
The gruesome murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were ringing in everyone's ears around the entire country. The O.J. Simpson trial was one of the biggest publicized trials in history. This case took place in Los Angeles, California in the year of 1994. June 12, 1994 marked the day of their deaths and also the day that Orenthal James Simpson became the face surrounding the media. There were many different speculations about what happened that night, but one thing was for certain, a guilty man is free.
The OJ Simpson Criminal Case (Investigation and Interrogation) Kaitlyn Marie Debrodie CJA 401 August 30, 2014 Professor Nick Tzakis The OJ Simpson Criminal Case (Investigation and Interrogation) The Interrogation of Orenthal James (O. J) Simpson On one faithful night in June of 1994, a gruesome double murder took place.
The most known one was the famous bloody glove found at the crime scene. The glove matched another glove found at OJ’s house. There was also evidence that Nicole Brown Simpson was abused by Simpson. They argued that he had a reason to kill her because of their toxic relationship. Simpson’s defense team, led by Johnie Cochran, argued that the evidence was circumstantial and that police did not properly handle the investigation.
In this informative article titled “Everything, you need to know before watching the people vs. O.J. Simpson.” Writer Ashley Ross from Time magazine does just that. She gives you a rundown of what some people call the trial of the century. With the brand new television series that just aired on FX it was nice to have a reminder of what all led up to this monumental trial. As we are watching this series unfold with all of its glory it may slip your mind that this actually happened in 1994, when a very famous football player was accused and found not guilty in the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson as well as her friend Ron Goldman, who was just dropping off a pair of glasses when he was brutally murdered.
1994 The OJ Simpson trial of murder “I did not have anything to do with these crimes. Ever.” once said OJ Simpson (http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/o/o_j_simpson.html). Everyone knew that Simpson did murder Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman.
Orenthal James “O.J.” Simpson: A Convicted Glass of Juice The mid afternoon sun beats down on the highway. The roar of a V6 engine in that 1994 White Ford Bronco. The wailing sirens of the dozens of county, state, and local police cars behind the Bronco. The crowds along the highway.
(Linder, “Orenthal J. Simpson”).His central motivation was Jealousy. When His ex dated his rival he became jealous. We find out about this through Linder telling us this in his article. He says OJ’s ex wife dated his rival Marcus Allen, the running back for the Kansas City Chiefs. (Linder, “Nicole Brown Simpson”).
The reason O.J. was found not guilty of murder and acquitted in criminal court, but found guilty of the tort of harm and ordered to pay damages in the civil court lies in the structure of our legal system, in regards to criminal cases and civil cases. The distinct difference between criminal cases and civil cases provides further explanation regarding the O.J. Simpson case. Criminal cases deal with crimes against society. It is the government, not the victim, who brings action against the charged individual. In criminal cases, the penalties can include a number things including jail time.
He told jurors "If he couldn’t have her didn’t want anybody else to have her." Marcia Clark stated the facts proving Simpson's guilt that they established during the trial (Linder 7). Marcia Clark was the chief prosecutor (Goldberg). Johnnie Cochran was Simpson's lead attorney, who said the opening statement for the defense. He stated a timeline of events that didn't add up also that it was no way that OJ couldn't have pulled off a double murder with the arthritis that he has.
This story makes me think about OJ Simpson, he was acquitted for the murders of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman, but a year later he lost a civil suit to their parents which essentially made him guilty of the murders. But long before either jury had a chance to vote on his innocence or guilt he was found guilty in the “court” of public opinion. The public opinion vote will haunt Simpson through his entire life, people will always see him as guilty and think he got away with murder. Much like OJ, the chief will have the “court” of public opinion to contend with the rest of his career in Pamlico county.
The People v. O. J. Simpson trial took place between the years of 1994 and 1995. During this highly media covered case jury members were constantly changed out. They were deemed discredited for their own individual life events before the trial. Women who had a record of domestic violence were asked to leave. Men who had autographs, pictures with and merchandise of O.J. Simpson were also asked to be excused.
The O.J. Simpson case was a different one because he was a celebrity. The celebrity status made all the difference in the case, as most people had diverse views on the case. As a famous individual, the media also had the chance to broadcast the trial and give differences of opinion on the case. The celebrity status had a significant influence in the O.J. Simpson case as the public had to struggle with an image he had created for many years. People knew O.J. Simpson as a footballer and an actor with a charming character impossible to hurt anyone.
OJ Simpson is Indeed Innocent “If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” this quote said by one of OJ Simpson’s attorneys, Johnny Cochran, is widely known for its impact on the controversial case of OJ Simpson. From 1994-1995 OJ Simpson was known as one of the most controversial cases in the USA due to the verdict that OJ was innocent of the murders of his ex wife and one of her friends. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman met an untimely demise, and the only suspect the police ever reviewed was OJ Simpson. OJ was later caught in a low speed chase in a white Ford Bronco before being taken into custody and put on trial. In the sensationally controversial court case involving OJ Simpson as a suspect for murder, The innocent ruling