ipl-logo

Why Not Act Like The Left Essay

625 Words3 Pages

Top 5 reasons to not act like the Left There was a report that a group of Pro-Trump supporters shouted down a Leftist speaker at a college in California a few days ago. Many on the Right intrinsically realise this is wrong on many levels and the purpose here is to detail why we need to refrain from this abhorrent behaviour. 1. When you act like a barbarian you become the a barbarian. This is a bit of a cliché, but it does hold some wisdom. Our basic purpose here is to differentiate ourselves from the other side and show our policies as superior in the marketplace of ideas. Therefore it should be obvious that we need to act differently than our opponents. We certainly cannot condemn the Left for acting like children when our side does the same. 2. Using their ‘advantage’ against them. There are certain martial arts …show more content…

3. It is antithetical to our basic principles. In many ways there is a basic litmus test that differentiates the principles of the Left from those of the Right. The Left would like as much control over your life as possible, the Right eschews this principle. We on the Right would prefer to live our lives unmolested by government interference. This interference extends to that of free-speech. To be blunt about it, the Left’s concepts are inferior and they can only win by dominating the marketplace of ideas, we can be confident that our policies are superior and will win in a fair debate of the issues. 4. We need to differentiate ourselves from the Left. It is always important to consider the point of view of those who aren’t as involved in the activities of the political realm. Many of us are too busy living our lives and raising our children to be concerned over what the two sides are doing on a day to day basis. Therefore it is imperative that everyone can see that we trust the people and can [rhetorically] beat the Left in an open and honest

Show More
Related
313 Words | 2 Pages

Universities and junior colleges are places where we learn different things and ideas from the different spheres and influences from our professors and instructors. These are also a place where we should value different opinions from both sides, in order to form a position in where you stand in your beliefs as a person, a balance opinion should be our utmost priority in order to have a constructive dialogue between both sides of the political spectrum. However, not validating and listening to the opinion of others can create a divisive rhetoric, where we end up ridiculing and criticising one another because of his/her political views. In the essay from Christina Hoff Sommers, “For More Balance on Campuses,” she criticises the liberalisation

Read More
1045 Words | 5 Pages

Politics. What does it do to us and our views of people? In “Divided We Now Stand,” Susan Page, the current Washington Bureau Chief for USA today, explains just that. She spends the article giving readers studies and insights as to how people oppose simply because the party says to oppose, and she shows us how people feel about opposing parties and treat them as a result of partisan views. In this article, Page has many good points and strategies, but her argument could be improved.

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

Walter Lippman’s article “The Indispensable Opposition” is a criticism of society’s failure to support political freedom and the freedom of speech in America. Lippman’s article is written with beautiful diction, artful syntax, examples, and appeals to the audience. With the expert use of all of these rhetorical choices, Lippman truly displays the “opposition” in America over freedoms. Lippman’s article is written in such a professional way. His word voice is complicated but isn’t complicated to the point where it can be misunderstood.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Most Americans fought for their individual rights for decades before WW2. The first amendment in the Bill of Rights guarantees the right to free speech meaning that the citizens of America are allowed to read, write, and share ideas freely and act in opposition. Walter Lippmann, social philosopher and writer’s, article, The Indispensable Opposition, appeared in the Atlantic Monthly in 1939 during WW2. Lippmann informs Americans in the article on the importance of everyone having the freedom of speech and opinion in society by separating what is believed and what is the truth by creating juxtaposition, incorporating strong repetition, and invoking powerful diction to set the tone.

Read More
221 Words | 1 Pages

Liberals have always been fear-mongering fools but The L.A. Times and writer James Kirchick have, officially, lost their minds. So fearful of a Donald Trump Presidency, thereby ruining their Liberal World Order that they are now resorting to throwing out scenarios that have President Trump nuking a country because they made fun of his small hands? They may have had a case if Trump, in some liberal time-line, Trump ran across the stage at one of the Republican debates and beat Marco Rubio to a bloody pulp, screaming "My hands are normal... My hands are Normal".

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Argumentative essay Most people have a group of people they hang around or are associated with. With this group of people they are called rednecks or hicks, Many people believe that rednecks actually have red necks usually it is people who don’t associate with them or are from another state, that is not the case here. When redneck is being used it is describing a group of people, who aren’t afraid to get muddy, or talk about the stock show. Although there are many unspoken rules for being a redneck, three of these rules are the most important.

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

These fundamental human rights to which all people by liberals supported the right to live in liberty, and religious

Read More
277 Words | 2 Pages

1. The Republican effort to write a once-in-a-generation bill to cut taxes appears to be the last, best hope for the fractured party to find some common ground. But it’s also “bit like having a baby to save a failing marriage,” our reporters have concluded. Tensions abound, including over sharp reductions in how much Americans may save in 401(k) accounts.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

They are to ensure that the people maintain certain rights by the people in which the government can't infringe on. Both of them forbid cruel and unusual punishments of the people. They allow the people to alter or to abolish the government or to institute new government as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. They both concern situations about civil liberties. With these principles America couldn’t be what it is today thanks to the American colonist who stole the great ideas of the

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

A Debating Democracy America has been built on the principle that everyone has a voice and that everyone should use it, this leads to an innumerable amount of arguments, some that still persist. In The Thirteen American Arguments by award-winning writer, NBC Analyst, and American journalist, Howard Fineman, the author outlines what he believes are the thirteen most fundamentals arguments in U.S history. These thirteen arguments as well the numerous others are the building blocks of democracy and debate in our country. One of the ideals that makes this country unique, is the value of free speech. Everyone has the freedom to make their voice heard to the rest of the country.

Read More
1176 Words | 5 Pages

With the introduction of social media and an increased access to technology, people are becoming more and more likely to let themselves delve into the great echo box of the internet where they have no obligation to be met with any other opposing opinion so they should choose. This is having the equally concerning effect where people are convincing themselves more and more that they are the moral champions of any political fight they should so choose to partake in. Both sides of the spectrum are guilty of this error and need to find ways to make meaningful dialogue or else the cultural barrier could become impenetrable. Unfortunately, this seems to becoming more and more likely as people declare themselves to be the sole proprietor of the moral high ground on any issue coupled with the fact that our President practically endorses violent dialogue in any conversation, it truly makes the hope of finding common ground in our country abysmal. Divisions are healthy and even necessary for a nation to survive, but when the divisions become too wide is there anything else to do but split?

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

For the last 70 years, the majority of African-Americans voters have been more democrats than ever. "The African-American population is about 44.5million. Only 16.1 million voted in 2008", but “95% chose the democratic party”. More than one are unworthy because African-Americans turn their back to the Republicans, those who fought for them in the past. To change this and increase African Americans votes republican should change and/or make some of their policies more flexible that is it right now.

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

In Judith Shklar’s well known 1989 essay, The Liberalism of Fear, Shklar analyzes her view on political liberalism. In other words, Judith believes that liberalism has only one potential purpose/goal. Judith Shklar mentions how the goal for liberalism is to ultimately fix the political conditions which is significant for personal freedom. Using this idea, Judith Shklar further demonstrates her views on liberalism by comparing liberalism of fear and other types of liberalism in her essay ( such as John Locked John Stuart Mill) . Judith Shklar believes that John Locke’s liberalism of natural rights is simply an attempt to fulfill an determined standard order “The liberalism of natural rights envisages a just society composed of politically sturdy citizens, each able and willing to stand up for himself and others” (26-27).

Read More
214 Words | 1 Pages

Libertarians disagree. They think that we must never violate anyones rights-even if doing so would increase overall happiness. According

Read More
289 Words | 2 Pages

In the article, “The Indispensable Opposition,” author, Walter Lippmann, argues his claim that we must view the freedom of oppositions as a way to improve our decisions in a democratic society rather than just tolerating that freedom of speech. When freedom of speech is tolerated and only seen as a right to speak, Lippmann believes that the liberty of opinion becomes a luxury. Moving forward, Lippmann then states that we must understand that the freedom of speech for our opponents are a vital necessity since it provides our own opinions to grow in improvement. Through practical experience, we realize we need the freedom of opposition and is no longer just our opponent ’s right.

Read More

More about Why Not Act Like The Left Essay

Related Topics

Open Document