Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of civilization 1
Importance of culture identity
Importance of culture identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of civilization 1
Importance of culture identity
Importance of culture identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A nation will only be successful if all members share similar values or similar goals. Any number of people who live under one governing power will only be able to thrive and prosper if they are united by a set of beliefs that will lead each person in the nation to success. For example, the United States has an American National Identity which strives for equality, fairness, justice, and progress. This common identity creates a sense of pride or patriotism within all of the members, making a more feasible path to achieving the goals previously mentioned.
Similar to the repetition of “we,” the word “nation” also creates a bond between the audience members. However, “nation” also gives the audience a purpose to fight:
The uniting of the British colonies to form Canada was an event of great uncertainty as the opinions on the topic drastically differed. Although the settlers had similar beginnings in the lands, they now called home, the differences of culture, language and customs remained. The proximity of the lands did not translate in the people. Issues with the Canadian identity still exist which is evident in the strong views of many that live in Quebec. It can be argued that placing varying groups of people in the same nation can be cause for divide and may weaken feelings of nationalism.
Although there are many forms of nationalism, their goals are relatively similar. All forms of nationalism focus on promoting the best interest of the nation. Our book defines nationalism as “The idea that membership in a nation is the overriding focus of political identity and loyalty, which demands national self-determination (Owens). ” Nationalism can be classified as civic or ethnic and it may also support or oppose existing states. Most assume that civic nationalism is good and ethnic nationalism is bad; although this might not always be the case, in today’s society it seems as though this is true.
This essay argues that states that are ethnically and culturally similar are more likely to engage in conflicts over
And people with the same language and the same history had the right to form independent states and competition and rivalry between the nations about who was the best with military and economic . Therefore each country tried
There are still many who consider nationality on the terms of mere physical attributes, cultures, languages, religion and so on. Today is a jumble of pandemonium. And most individuals do not even realize it. Nationality itself is a doubtful entity, for nations are only political boundaries divided by abstract lines that do not really exist. If stripped to its basest, the concept of nations is another variation of the Self and the Other all over again.
Throughout the history of the world, people have been bound to each other by geography, culture, experience and adversity. To work with your neighbor was to prosper, solidarity was not an option. Ironically, the very same things that brought people together, also pit them against each other, differing opinions and beliefs and values created friction and wars. In this day and age, diasporas by groups of people with differing cultures, beliefs, locations, and histories have brought these different peoples together here in America. But the same idea still applies: To work with your neighbor is to prosper, but difference brings adversity.
Natural rights are the 3 things people naturally should have such as life liberty and property. an example of one is the U.S Declaration of Independence, the document includes all of the natural rights, social contract is the idea that countries do what in the best interest of the government 's citizens, and the citizens give up some rights. Usually all governments follow the social contract but you can see aspects in the declaration of independence. Civic virtue is that morally right to involve citizens with the involvement of the society like voting. A examples of document that include civic virtue is the constitution in the U.S. Popular sovereignty is when citizens vote on who they want their representative to be so they are a part of the
Treaties and even the right to asylum as a mechanism of protection could be considered as effective and democratic way of assimilating people into a nation-state. Minorities will be protected in order to be assimilated into a broader identity, if treaties couldn’t reach this important target, so nation-state has the right to take whatsoever necessary actions to get rid of this problem. In other words, citizenship can be seen as a reward of this assimilation, a reward which can be taken away when you are not what have been expected to be. This has another implication that the nation-state is not against individual to have a different nationality, but it simply does not recognise people without nationality; this is because the very existence of nation-state depends on the tension between nationalities. Establishment of a nation-state for stateless people as a solution for their emancipation is a realisation of this situation.
In reality, there is a multitude of different factors at play which shape the identity of any member of a nation or state. Despite its shortcomings, Primordialism is useful when applied to ethnicity. Primordialists claim that ethnic identity is something that is innate and born with a human being. National characteristics according to this theory would be the physical characteristics of an ethnic group, the skin color, hair type, eye shape, etc. Individuals are born with these qualities and cannot be changed like the ethnic group they were born into.
Every country has its own unique qualities, cultures, and peoples. These are the things that make each region unique. Many times, countries have a slogan or stereotype given to them based on the people who live there. The United States of America, for example, has long been known as “the land of opportunity”. The people of early America worked long and hard to earn it this slogan.
After addressing the propositions, Miller dedicates one chapter (chapter 6) to explore the link between the seemingly erosion of national identity in western democracies. He argues that national identities are not eroding per se. Rather, it is the “growing uncertainty about the cultural values and political principles that distinguishes one nation from the next”. More generally, On Nationality is a book where Miller defends the idea of civic nationalism. This school of thought stems from a liberal analysis of nationalism and national identity.
Like the shared sense of belonging citizens feel to their country, town or city. The sense of ones’ nation, as highlighted in Boym’s book, has generated feelings of patriotism and nationalism. Every nation has its own identity by which it is judged and categorized by. Every country is defined by their unique set of features. When change occurs too fast by means of technology and modernization, there is a desire to look back at history.
A nation stems from a pre-existing history. It does not require that all the members be alike but they must have a bond of solidarity to the other members of the nation. Nationalism is a movement for the attainment and maintenance of unity, identity and autonomy of a population that its members consider a nation. Nations are a product of modernity but it is likely to find ethnic elements that exist in these nations.