ipl-logo

Why Should One Remain Loyal To A King?

682 Words3 Pages

Why should one remain loyal to a king? If one remained loyal to a king, what would you think of one who wanted a rebellion? Think of absolute power or two. Think of the trouble of the russian servants or, for the element, American slaves. Were the British that awful? Firstly, a loyalist would see a problem where the colonies were being controlled by nearly a generous set of laws that gave a lot of rights and and advantages. Sure not everyone was defined in gathering, but not everyone in England was one. The point was that the rights were protected. There were some wrong taxes, but when have taxes ever been praised? When have they ever been right? Think of all the protection England implemented. Paine’s argument is hyped-up big talk, the loyalist …show more content…

The king is a source of correction for the loyalist, and when injustice is done, the king is the you ask for advice. When Paine wrote, “ In England all the king has to do is make war and give away places; which in plain terms, is to impoverish the nation and set it together by the ears. A pretty business indeed for a man to be allowed eight hundred thousands sterling a year for, and worshipped into the bargain” it set the atmosphere for an altogether different contact to the innovation. And then “Of more worth is one honest man to society, and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians who ever lived” that will be a conversation to take down the dreadful crown, and authorize the inborn equality of men. The loyalist would also say that Paine is a traitor and should be hung as a traitor. That would be it sum up. Most people against Thomas Paine would not read his pamphlets anyway so they would disagree with him and

Show More
Related
751 Words | 4 Pages

The American Revolution was a war based off principles, and fought by both Loyalists and Patriots. The Loyalists believed that without the kings rule they would lose their fortune, be in chaos, and mob rule; however some were just against the brutality of war. Now the Patriots were complete opposites, patriots believed in principles, freedom;to be free from taxes, the king, the tranny they faced under the rule of the king, to be able to speak when and where you want, and to practice the religion they believe in; but who was actually right the Patriots or the Loyalists. In the novel, My Brother Sam is Dead a family struggles with the decision of being Loyalists or Patriots. War is negative because of the injustice of Life, Jerry, and Sam’s death, all of which convince Tim to become neutral.

Read More
291 Words | 2 Pages

Sentimental Influence Fighting for freedom is what got us here today! Back then in the 1770’s America wanted force, but wanted proper application of force. Colonist wanted separation from England since their people were not being treated right. The colonists suffer when British invade the colonies, welcoming themselves into colonists’ homes, along with inequality government wise.

Read More
356 Words | 2 Pages

5) During the Revolutionary War, some Colonists wanted to remain loyal to the King while others did not. Give reasons for this. During the American Revolution people were often either Patriots or Loyalists. Patriots were people who wanted the American Colonies to be independence from Britain.

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine, a new land across the sea found so people can get away from all their troubles and start a new life. Everyone get’s there is excited for their new life but come to see it’s exactly the the same but worse. A tyranny that’s being run into the ground by bad decisions and bad relations with other people will they realize they're issues before it’s to late or will the continent be saved by a different cause. When examining the events of Stamp Act, the similarities and differences between Patriot and Loyalists’ While both sides had their differences they all had common ground, they both shared the British tax system and laws. Whether the Loyalists agreed with the Parliament or the Patriots thought it was an imposition on their rights,

Read More
82 Words | 1 Pages

Thomas Paine wrote a series of articles known collectively as "The Crisis" to support his argument for independence from England during the Revolutionary War. Thomas Paine 's reasoning for writing this collection of articles is rather sound. The call to arms in this document calls “tens of thousands” to arms to battle Great Britain and their unfair rule over their country. Paine was justified in his writing, the unfair rule of the British government did need to be “called out” sort of speak.

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

In Paines excerpt he is talking to the audience which is the American people(soldiers), and he is showing and proving to them that he needs them to listen to him. He is the same as any person that is listening so he has to try and prove himself that something needs to happen. The soldiers realize how bad they are being treated and what is happening. They know that Britain has the power to start taxing and bind them no matter what. Paine is knowing of what the british are capable of and what they will do if they get more power.

Read More
1491 Words | 6 Pages

At the dawn of the 1770s, American colonial resentment of the British Parliament in London had been steadily increasing for some time. Retaliating in 1766, Parliament issued the Declaratory Act which repealed most taxes except issued a reinforcement of Parliament’s supremacy. In a fascinating exchange, we see that the Parliament identifies and responds to the colonists main claim; Parliament had no right to directly tax colonists who had no representation in Parliament itself. By asserting Parliamentary supremacy while simultaneously repealing the Stamp Act and scaling back the Sugar Act, Parliament essentially established the hill it would die on, that being its legitimacy. With the stage set for colonial conflict in the 1770s, all but one

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

Paine is more logical, giving reasons as to why they should fight in a calm manner. He uses logic, such as “It matters not where you live, or what rank of life you hold, the evil or the blessing will reach you all” (Paine

Read More
1069 Words | 5 Pages

In his discussion, Paine argues out that apart from gaining international respect, America would advance its own security and commerce by being able to trade with other partners in Europe and the globe. He mentions that all Europe should benefit from America’s goods not only Britain. He explains that by saying British are not the only people who settled the continent but different parts of Europe, so British should not be the only European country to benefit from the colonies. As a result of all the reasons above, the colonies needed no reason to continue submitting to Britain authority and should gain their

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

He truly believes that Great Britain will have an extremely difficult time controlling the colonies for any long period of time. Specifically, Paine states that “Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered”. He uses plenty of figurative language, such as similes and metaphors, to make his speech as thought provoking as possible. Although, Paine obviously tries to make the speech as understandable as possible so any common man or woman can interpret

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

On January 10, 1776 in Philadelphia, Thomas Paine creates his pamphlet Common Sense.. In his pamphlet, it explains about how he believes that the people should fight against the cruel King George III and the British Parliament. Paine had used simple common sense in writing his pamphlet to show the Colonists that they should fight back against Britain. The very first thing that Paine talked about in Common Sense was about how horrible King George III was, he basically attacked the king. The attack on the king was “viewed as shockingly insubordinate, Paine’s personal attack on the king was greeted as an apt response to this new provocation”.

Read More
233 Words | 1 Pages

Yes his argument was compelling because he used persuasive words that made the King of Britain sound like a monster and a horrible dictator and that they needed independence badly before things got even worse. In Common Sense Paine says this “For all men being originally equals, no one by birth could have the right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others forever and tho’ himself might deserve some decent degree of honours of his contemporaries, yet his descendants might be far too unworthy to inherit them.” Paine was saying that even though the people were born free they would never know how free they really were because they were under harsh dictatorship and basically that is all the people knew back then. Thomas Paine was trying to get to the point that America will eventually become dependent. At times, he introduces this as a simple fact that everyone accepts, but sometimes, he argues for it, quoting the area of the flaw separating the colonies and the English king.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

Henry, in agreement to Paine, also expresses that the King has reached a point where he does not care of the colonists and treats them as inferior, Henry is hinting at the point that Britain is just hurting the colonists (Henry). Not only does he express this he concludes with this quote: “Why stand we here idle?... Give me liberty or give me death” (Henry). Paine and Henry and Paine both suggest that a revolution should commence due to the pain inflicted and subordination inflicted. Why should the colonists not

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

Before this many Colonists did not know of the harsh injustices done by the British. They also did not believe that the cause for revolution was urgent. Thomas Paine showed them that the cause was urgent by explaining the wrongs the British had committed and why King George was a tyrant. He also showed them that America did not need the British Empire 's protection. This quote shows his reasoning “Small islands, not capable of protecting themselves, are the proper objects for kingdoms to take under their care; but there is something absurd, in supposing a continent to be perpetually governed by an island.”

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

He starts by analyzing the past, saying that if any mistakes were made, they “have none to blame but ourselves” (IN TEXT). However, he counters this with the idea that they cannot change the past, but embrace its effects and move on. Next, he appeals to the logic of his Puritan beliefs. Paine says that he believes that “God Almighty will not give up a people to military destruction” (IN TEXT). This gives the reader a sturdy base to place their hope, which he later increases by calling the king out for his murderous and unethical actions, and claims that the king has no grounds to seek support or solace from

Read More

More about Why Should One Remain Loyal To A King?

Related Topics

Open Document