Why should one remain loyal to a king? If one remained loyal to a king, what would you think of one who wanted a rebellion? Think of absolute power or two. Think of the trouble of the russian servants or, for the element, American slaves. Were the British that awful? Firstly, a loyalist would see a problem where the colonies were being controlled by nearly a generous set of laws that gave a lot of rights and and advantages. Sure not everyone was defined in gathering, but not everyone in England was one. The point was that the rights were protected. There were some wrong taxes, but when have taxes ever been praised? When have they ever been right? Think of all the protection England implemented. Paine’s argument is hyped-up big talk, the loyalist …show more content…
The king is a source of correction for the loyalist, and when injustice is done, the king is the you ask for advice. When Paine wrote, “ In England all the king has to do is make war and give away places; which in plain terms, is to impoverish the nation and set it together by the ears. A pretty business indeed for a man to be allowed eight hundred thousands sterling a year for, and worshipped into the bargain” it set the atmosphere for an altogether different contact to the innovation. And then “Of more worth is one honest man to society, and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians who ever lived” that will be a conversation to take down the dreadful crown, and authorize the inborn equality of men. The loyalist would also say that Paine is a traitor and should be hung as a traitor. That would be it sum up. Most people against Thomas Paine would not read his pamphlets anyway so they would disagree with him and