WaiTo Wong
Polsc 1
Prof. Uranga
8/7/2014
Was Brown v Board decided correctly?
Back in 1950s', African American children were rejected admission to normal public schools which are attended by white children, under laws requiring or allowing segregation towards to the races. Linda Brown who is the main character in this event, she was born in Topeka, Kansas. Despite the fact she grew up in a ethnically diverse neighborhood, she was still forced to go to a school which need an hour time to reach instead of going to a school which was four blocks away from her house. Back at that time Topeka's schools are being segregated by races. Later in 1950, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People asked a group of African American
…show more content…
Ferguson invalid, which proposed the concept of separate but equal. Where the statement guarantee equal protection however in this case despite it all, the school still refused Brown's admission. The legal team's main argument is that the public schools' state-sanctioned segregation is unbearable, where it also was a violation to the 14th amendment where therefore it was unconstitutional. In 1954, the ruling is complete where the vote was 9-0 in favor of the plaintiffs and it overturned the statement of separate but equal. Thus allowing students in the United States disregarding their race, will experience a better, fairer education. The Brown v. board of Education decision became a catalyst for the motivation during 50s and 60s for civil rights fight, and eventually led to a huge success, although the fights are rough and many lost lives to fighting for equality and opportunities in the society. It was not an easy time but this open had opened a new door for the people back then to see a way out; where it allowed people of colors to have an fair chance in the society and education in generally regardless of where they live or …show more content…
The case showed the education system did not meet the standard of equality from the 14th Amendment. Where from my point of view the court made up the positions on both sides and ruled it without any precedent. Moreover, the ruling itself already imply our society is full of unfairness and the tendency of people will be segregated, thus create hate between groups. Also, the court back then seems to be only choosing from two options, where the first was the society model before 1954, which is segregation and race hierarchy existed and sanctified by law. The groups can both operate separately and unequally; on the other hand, there was the model where were decided in 1954 in which there will only be one cultural style, the society will become a melting pot and combine different cultures into one set of universal