Essay On Brown V Board Of Education

1056 Words5 Pages

On May 17, 1954, the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court Case, who was argued by NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) attorney Thurgood Marshall occurred. The reason this case took place is because Oliver Brown believed that segregation in public schools was a mistaken act of the school system. The Supreme Court Case was challenging, but what happened before they got to Washington D.C is even more overwhelming. Oliver Brown, born on August 19, 1918 is the father of Linda Brown who was discriminated and rejected a place in Sumner Elementary School which was a near white public school. Other parents along with Oliver tried to apply to put their children in a white school closer to their homes, but the principal …show more content…

Many of the children in the schools were hurt and felt like they were nobodies. This quote from Dr Hugh W. Speer explains exactly how the children felt. "...if the colored children are denied the experience in school of associating with white children, who represent 90 percent of our national society in which these colored children must live, then the colored child's curriculum is being greatly curtailed. The Topeka curriculum or any school curriculum cannot be equal under segregation." Most of the black children at the schools weren't getting the accurate education that they deserved, therefore Oliver Brown and other plaintiffs decided to go to the Topeka Kansas court, and fight for …show more content…

Board of Education will make more sense knowing how much trouble the children and the adults went through. The first time the case was heard at the Supreme Court, it was 1952. Thurgood Marshall was the main arguer in the case, and gave some personal stories of how the segregation in all of America had hurt him and other African-Americans. After hearing the cases for the first time, the nine justices on the Supreme Court all had mixed feeling on how they felt they should handle the case. They soon then decided that they shall hear the case again, then they would make their final decision. But, as you know that did not happen. They scheduled the rehearing for May 1952, but the case rehearing got delayed till May because of other cases that were