Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Class stratification gilded age
Class stratification gilded age
1800s social inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Class stratification gilded age
Class stratification gilded age
1800s social inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Then Tocqueville surprised me even more. He could tell that we were on our way to civil war. I don’t recall anyone in American telling us we were going to enter the bloodiest conflict in American history if we didn’t change how we treated our slaves. But Tocqueville looked at that relationship and realized that if the South continued to own slaves and treat them like pack-animals then at some point, someone was going to break. I find it a little insulting that a foreigner, who stayed in America all of 9 months, was able to detect a brewing conflict that we were blind to.
POLITICAL - by keeping the social classes, in continued the trend with political involvement: the higher social classes had more say in the government in comparison to the lower classes. Reduced interdependence of classes by splitting them into sections; now if one class in one group failed, only a portion of the other classes would suffer. Took away some Unitarian power and implemented a diluted form of Federalism. This would disappear after lines between classes blurred and eventually ceased to exist at all, near the end of the 19th century to the beginning of the
Education is what determines your social class and the Southern elites knew it would be a matter of time
Sierra Andreas Ms Scott 1 - 3 - 2023 AP US History Unit 5 Guiding Questions and Terms Economic development came after territorial expansion, and it made regional tensions between the North and South worse. In the North economic development pushed towards industrialization, the creation of a market system, and a transport revolution. These economic developments flourished due to the high amount of immigrants moving into the area. The South however, was very different as it continued its growth of slavery and the cotton economy. The white landowners of the South pushed for less laws surrounding slavery and the African American slaves were forced to deal with hardships pertaining to their family, religion and the suffering from slavery .
The French people’s knowledge of their rights led them to believe that it is possible to achieve fairness and be respected in their own province. And lastly, the idea of questioning France’s government had peasants discover that their king barely even cared about their well-being and restricted them of representation.
Sectionalism was a driving force in the evolution of the nation, but it developed in a cogent and cohesive manner, leaving a detailed connection to its roots and sectional tensions are primarily responsible for the succession of political
Specifically, in the 1960s, a decade where de Tocqueville’s defining characteristics of American Exceptionalism are
Although the past was not explicitly described as the focus was the modern, we can illustrate a picture of history by inference of the snippets that were offered. France, where Tocqueville was from, “seven hundred years ago… was divided up between a few families who owned the land and ruled the inhabitants… the right to give orders
Cotton fashioned the Federalist South. This new found goods was so extremely lucrative that its splendor exposed to a formerly shut culture to the magnificence, the revenue, the manipulation, and the social magnitudes of a greater, more attached, global community (Locke & Wright, 1983). Inhabitants who were less diverse became more multicultural, more educated, and better-off. As the people fortunate to have found themselves better-off systems of class was established. Previous all were considered a group, but with the new found class system, people were divided into upper, lower and middle class.
The Crenshaw reading and the Black Feminist Statement talk about how women have suffered through the years fighting against violence, racial, sexual and class oppression. Women over the years have felt the politicization of millions of people and this is more powerful than a few voices. The way people think about women violence have changed. For example, rape once was seen as a very private and personal situation, but now this is seen as an issue that affect women as a class. The process of recognizing groups such as gay, lesbians and people of color have characterized the identity politics of these groups.
The vietnam war and its relations to the domino theory: was connected to all presidents who were in offices during the early 50’s to the mid 70’s due to its high tensions that arose before the war all the way to the end of the soviet union’s reign in the mid 90’s. The theory states that if one country in the asian countries falls into communism, then other countries will as well. Vietnam as well as other countries had been fighting wars against communism which made it split between north and south. The vietnam war was caused by communism and the U.S. intervened to stop communism. Later it would be worried by Dwight D. Eisenhower as well that the spread of communism be inevitable.
De Tocqueville doesn 't view liberty as an attribute part of the democratic era. He believes that the only character that is associated with this era is equality. He explains in his theory that people of this era prize equality over liberty, although he doesn 't deny that democratic people value liberty, because everyone can take part in it and enjoy it effortlessly, as opposed to liberty where you have to "sacrifice" to achieve it (De Tocqueville, 1835). He holds that equality creates individualism, which means people separate themselves from one another, their ancestors and the future generations, that leads to tyranny and despotism. On the contrary, he claims that during the aristocratic ages, people were not selfish and careless about others ' needs because "aristocracy links everybody, from peasant to king" (De Tocqueville, 1835).
Tocqueville provided an analysis of how citizens can prevent equality from evolving into a high degree of isolation. Tocqueville analyzed and compared America 's democratic society and Europe 's aristocratic society. In Europe, men remained in a fixed state and class; some men held greater influence and power over others. There was a formal social hierarchy where "a man almost always knows his
He puts forward the idea of “freedom of opinion” (Tocqueville 106) and constitutes it as “independence of mind and real freedom of discussion” (Tocqueville 104). Unlike Locke, this stretches far beyond what is done. Tocqueville is careful to differentiate this liberty from the freedom of speech, as this freedom from opinion is more meant to indicate the freedom to follow different paths of thought and not be unfairly judged for it. Once again, it is the majority who suppresses this in Tocqueville’s opinion, as scorn and persecution for unwanted opinions permeate throughout society (Tocqueville 105). Tocqueville’s entanglement of liberty and what is right means that a majority’s limitation of liberty is unjust, while Locke’s concept of liberty means it must necessarily be restrained by a majority in order to protect the principle aim of government, to protect
ruled by the few, it seems inevitable that the aristocrats severed the people into factions. As an elitist city-state, such laws that were passed did not abide by the wishes of the poor but by the wishes of the rich (“The Rise of Democracy,” n.d.). If the people did not obey, then “they used the army to force people to obey them” (“The Rise of Democracy,” n.d.). Of course, this means there was a distinct socioeconomic inequality, and so the oligarchy, or the aristocracy, was deemed oppressive. Eventually, this encourages rebellious attitudes leading to tyranny.