ipl-logo

Wisdom Of Group Groups

1918 Words8 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Advantage and disadvantage of group thinking

What does the wisdom of the crowds even mean? According to James Surowiecki, it is the idea that when you take a large amount of people you can find a more accurate answer than any one person can. Surowiecki states that you can select the most intelligent person to solve a problem. However, if you get a large enough group of people, selected at random, they will in fact come up with a more accurate answer to the problem. When reading this book, I had a hard time believing the claim that a group of average people could in fact come up with better conclusion than an educated person. Whatever the situation may be, this one person is trained, educated and has more experience dealing with the given problem. What is it about groups that would allow them to come up with a better solution than someone who is well informed on the given problem? …show more content…

Currently, I have a group in each one of my classes. Each group has some similarities and some uniqueness associated with them. In each group, one person usually separates themselves as the “leader” of the group. The leader of the group can be determined based on being the most driven, outspoken, opinioned, organized or respected. Each of these qualities that makes a leader can also hurt the group. I have learned that people can easily get offended. When certain people take control of a group, others in the group can shut-off with the mindset that their ideas are not respected or heard. They may feel that their time is being wasted due to the fact that the leader will just go with their own ideas. The introverts of the group can easily be engulfed into groupthink. Agreeing with others ideas, viewing them as the safe answer because they won’t have to explain their thoughts or

Show More
Related
851 Words | 4 Pages

Susan Cain begins the introduction to her book by stating that one of the most well know woman, Rosa Parks, was an introvert. She also informs the us that one out of every two or three people we know are introverts;however, we are not aware of it, due to the fact that our society values the extrovert ideal and those who are inverts must conform, In chapter one, Cain discusses in great depth how the ideal self in our society shifted from serious, disciplined, and honorable to gregorius, alpha and comfortable in the spotlight. According to Cain, we shifted from a society that values actual character to one that only values personality.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

When I think of strong group leadership, the first person or character that comes to mind is Griffith of the animated fantasy film series, Berserk. In most real or fictitious contexts, he is one of the strongest examples of leadership through personal power; power that “stems from a member’s individual character, competencies, and earned status” (Engleberg and Wynn 105). Griffith is the leader of the Band of the Hawk, a small army of mercenaries well-known on the battlefield. They’ve been hired by the King of Midland to capture the Fortress of Doldrey much to the ire of the Generals of Midland. However, the Midland army has already attempted this and suffered many casualties.

Read More
220 Words | 1 Pages

Most of us have heard of or even witnessed “mob mentality”, the behavioral tendency of people to act in unison with the group of which they are a part. We are more likely to do something as a group that we might not do as an individual. We can lose control of our inhibitions when our mentality becomes part of a group. As part of a group or corporation we may even feel a strong need to conform to social norms. Groupthink or deindividuation is similar to mob mentality.

Read More
92 Words | 1 Pages

Groupthink is a process of conformity to a group ideal that may or may not be true. It stems from lack of conflict, disagreement, or challenge to the direction of the group. In simple terms, if a group leader or president were to surround themselves with like-minded individuals there would be very little disagreement or conflict and the decisions of the group may not be the best. Historical examples include Nixon’s Watergate fiasco, and Kennedy’s Bay of Pigs catastrophe. The term groupthink was first introduced by social psychologist Irving Janis in 1972.

Read More
1719 Words | 7 Pages

You can determine the strongest leader in the group by noticing the more leadership ability a person has. Plus, a good leader relies on respect, so when they show respect to others, especially to the people that have less power, people will see you as a leader. Also if a leader has courage and is determined to succeed, does what is right, and is not afraid of danger, you stand out as a good leader. Finally if you are successful you will seem attractive to people around you, because when you are succeeding it draws in people and they will respect you. Just like your favorite sports team or player.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

It is a natural human instinct to want to be acknowledge by your peers, yet it is also important to be a critical thinker. Irving Janis in 1972 created the term groupthink. He believed groupthink occurs inside a group of similar people that want to keep from being different, resulting in incoherent decision-making. The 1957 film "12 Angry Men," uses groupthink, which influenced the verdict vote in the case of a teenager accused of murdering his father. The purpose of this essay is to examine groupthink and to represent Dr. Irving Janis’ symptoms of groupthink in the film.

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

The Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meeting at the Book Study Unity Club gave off a welcoming atmosphere. The environment was very family oriented and seemed to be a place of acceptance and redemption. Overall, the group process was extremely functional. There were a two leaders, one was the leader for the particular chapter the other was the leader of the particular meeting. In the beginning, the leaders both gave their background histories on how they were brought to AA.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

The writer talks about a survey that was done by the Journal of Science and the Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman. Just by putting the name of the person that did the survey made it stronger and increased the strength of the argument. The People that the Brooks talks about make the argument its strongest statement. The addition of others ethos make the argument more spiritual, more trustworthy and overall makes the argument easier to believe. All of those things make the argument stronger and is the strongest part of his overall argument he makes.

Read More
1150 Words | 5 Pages

Psychologist Irving Janis explained some alarmingly bad decisions made by governments and businesses coined the term "groupthink”, which he called "fiascoes.” He was particularly drawn to situations where group pressure seemed to result in a fundamental failure to think. Therefore, Janis further analyzed that it is a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members ' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. According to Janis, groupthink is referred as the psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups.

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

Descartes, Discourse on Method, Chapter 2 Descartes, discourse on method is not effective, because even though his method could be used to obtain information such as truth, and to discovery what is real, he would be taking away our modern thought which is to give equal rights to the people. In this discourse on Method, Descartes tries to make the calm that work accomplished by one person is better than work accomplished by a group. He believes that there are only two kinds of people, those who know more than they do, and rush to judgement. Those who think they need a teacher to find truth, and can’t distinguish with their own opinions.

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

Jenness (1932) found that when experiment participants carried out the task in a group, they reported estimates of roughly same value even though they had previously quoted different estimates as individuals. Jenness’ study revealed the impact of majority influence, and established a direct correlation between a group influence on an individual’s behaviour and beliefs especially when participants are uncertain about the actual number of beans in the jar. Another classical study on conformity was based on finding out how social norms are developed in social groups and how the influences of these norms when developed impact on an individual’s behaviour. The Autokinetic phenomenon study of Sherif (1937) according to Baron et al. (2008, p.277), illustrated vividly the impact of private acceptance of social influence.

Read More
1521 Words | 7 Pages

The groupthink phenomenon is one of the biased group decision making process that occurs when conformity is a norm with no alternate options being raised, hence, preventing the strengths of an individual to be seen (Janis). For the purpose of this essay, the case study I will be using is the Bay of Pigs Invasion in 1961 and the Cuban Missile Crisis that took place in 1962, as we can see the difference in results and actions, despite have the same group of people on the board for decision making for both events. This will better allow us to see how to avoid the pitfalls of groupthink. There are a total of eight symptoms for the groupthink phenomenon. They are the illusion of not being vulnerable, rationalising of their assumptions as a collective

Read More
2656 Words | 11 Pages

1. What are your specific strengths, weaknesses and challenges on an individual level in the context of working as a member of the project group?. Strengths: Come up with good ideas while discussing in the group.to speak out during seminars and knowing each and every one ideas in their point of view. I was very much able to understand entire concept of the project in the midway and it helped me to give good ideas.

Read More
1060 Words | 5 Pages

What makes a leader? I believe a leader to be intelligent ,tough, and has the determination to achieve a goal. Having certain skills will have an impact on you being a trustable leader. Being selfless and caring are also characteristics. Malcolm X his birth name Malcolm Little is a fine a example of a leader and has most of these leadership qualities.

Read More
1924 Words | 8 Pages

Leadership Analysis Introduction One of the popular definitions of a leader is, "The only definition of a leader is someone who has followers." ( ) A more comprehensive definition that highlights striking features of a leader is, "A simple definition of leadership is that leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal.” ( ) A closer scrutiny of the characteristics of an influential leader would many ways assist one, in recognizing those attributes in an attempt to assimilate the best in others.

Read More

More about Wisdom Of Group Groups

Related Topics

Open Document