Can the Working Class Make a Difference in the First World Countries?
According to "Why the Working Class?" Vivek Chibber explains why working class actually matters and their possible influences they could have on the system. This article is telling me that we need socialism or at least adopt some of its ideas to protect the working class and give them a chance at fulfilling their basic needs defined by this article. Also, the working class could and should be an exceptionally powerful force to reckon with since they are the majority of the population in essentially all capitalist societies. Besides that, the working class can stop the money flow to the factory owners as well. Anytime the workers or someone tries to generate change that the elite sees as a threat or harmful to maximizing their profits. The resistance or challengers are forced to
…show more content…
“… capitalists can only make their profits if workers show up to work every day, and if they refuse to play along, the profits dry up overnight.” (Chibber) Like they say money talks and, consequently, when money does talk a lot of people listen especially when it boils down to your survival. Things of this nature, especially in first world countries, this makes factories want to run to third world countries where the labor is cheap, they are not required to create safe working conditions, and these people do not actually have an abundance of job options. In these places, the people are not protected from their employers, unlike first world countries. So, in reality, the first world working class rebelling makes conditions worse for other people all over the globe a noteworthy example is the girls in Malaysia that I talked about in discussion 4. For example, many third world countries do not use clocks to keep track of work. Then they usually they are forced to wear very untraditional clothing compared to their