ipl-logo

Conservatism Of Today's US White Working Class

1062 Words5 Pages

Marx and Engels’ theories do not fully explain the conservatism of today’s U.S. white working class. As an economically oppressed group, Marx and Engels would have expected them to become revolutionary and act collectively to overthrow the current capitalist system. Instead, current working class white Americans focus on racial identity, and ended up electing Trump, a candidate who gives “revolutionary” an entirely new meaning.
When applied to the US white working class, Marx and Engels’ theories fall short in three main ways. The white working class does not fully meet the conditions Marx and Engels laid out for a revolutionary proletariat. They are not similar enough to the proletariat during the Industrial Revolution, and thus, applying …show more content…

They predict that the working classes of each nation will rise up together and join into a massive body with the same revolutionary aims. This, they say, is aided by new technologies such as railroads, telegraphs, and the nature of the factory work environment, which is conducive to starting collective action. However, while the U.S. white working-class does have access to technology that would allow them to communicate and form collectives, they do not become revolutionary leftists, but rather, make bee-lines towards conservative candidates with empty …show more content…

Men want to be “free and conscious producers.” (“The German Ideology”) By impeding man’s ability to realize his true desires, capitalism incentivizes the proletariat to demand change and make it happen. According to Marx and Engels, it is people’s ability to produce not solely to meet their needs, but as an end in and of itself that makes us truly human, and people will not rest until they reach their human potential.
A weakness of applying these theories to the U.S. white working-class lies in the fact that they do not neatly adhere to Marx and Engels’ pre-requisites for a revolutionary proletariat. To fully develop, they say, workers must be in close proximity at work, must be able to organize internationally, and must have a sense of empowerment from knowing they are the force behind the market.
The American white working class works physically closer to each other than the French peasants that Marx and Engels juxtapose with the proletariat. However, their working conditions might not be as ideal for revolution as those of the English factory workers they describe. Because of our service-economy, few people work traditional all-day shifts in huge factories with masses of co-workers. Workers may be part of a large body of employees, but may not be in contact with them during their entire shift, or feel as if they are truly part of a

Show More
Related
343 Words | 2 Pages

The growth of the nation has been stunted by the segregation of the business class and the working class. The capitalists claimed their effort to mechanize the manufacturers will provide an advantage to the working class. “Their tasks has become less onerous, the machine doing nearly everything which requires great strength” (Doc F). On the contrary, the workmen felt the continuous movement of the machines was “degrading man

Read More
336 Words | 2 Pages

Through his writing, Engel hopes to promote the determination of unions, like that of the Knights of Labor, to bring a new about a new society where everyone is equal and no one can “hoard millions” and no one is classified as “tramps and beggars.” This man after the Haymarket Square Riot is trying to convince his audience that Socialism is the right path, a way to spread the riches that have been acquired during this revolution and benefitted the lives of the workers and not just of the millionaires. Unfortunately, this was not

Read More
1477 Words | 6 Pages

Ask Carlos Bulosan, Isabel Allende, or Luis Valdez, and another story, drastically different from the ones perpetuated by those in positions of power, is heard. Marxism offers a controversial and harsh look at the realities of society. In a sink or swim nation where some people are given floatation devices and others have anchors tied to their legs, the two class system of the proletariat and bourgeoisie seems pervasive and all too relevant. While reading books written by those who were forced into the proletariat workforce lifestyle, common threads develop. The sense of hopelessness, self loathing, and

Read More
297 Words | 2 Pages

Along with a change in the political economy, the way of thinking for a class alters. Marx and Engels make it clear within their writing that these peoples consistently

Read More
1524 Words | 7 Pages

This document, by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, discusses the ideology of Communism and how it will affect the relationship between the proletariats and the bourgeois. The manifesto summarizes the theories of Marx and Engels about society and politics and the idea that the capitalist society will eventually become communist. They claim that "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles,” and that their policies will solve the problems of existing societies. (Part 1) With its appeal to logos and pathos, the manifesto seems very convincing, however, after closely considering the claims, the arguments gradually become more and more

Read More
309 Words | 2 Pages

Although Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx penned the Communist Manifesto in 19th Century Germany, the ideology in their work is not irrelevant in the 21st Century United States. In this text, Engels and Marx mention the veritable subjugation of Eastern society by Western capitalist nations (Engel and Marx, 17), and to this day, the US maintains the relevance of Marx and Engel’s claim in its relations with Eastern nations. The bourgeoisie society is a capitalist society, as is the US.

Read More
2005 Words | 9 Pages

The Enemies of the Western Way: A Communist and Fascist Perspective “The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.” ( Marx and Engels). In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels 's revolutionary work, The Communist Manifesto the authors discuss an egalitarian utopia where the conflict between classes transforms from the inherent cause of oppression, into the driving force for change (Marx and Engels). The Manifesto paints a vivid picture of a constant battle between the bourgeoisie ( employers) and the proletariat (the workers).

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment

Read More
1337 Words | 6 Pages

The Industrial Revolution cast its shadow upon European cities and towns. Some enjoyed this shade while others suffered tremendously because of it. Those who enjoyed the luxuries and wealth that the Industrial Revolution provided, the bourgeoisie, depended on the needs of the poor, the proletarians, to increase the size of their monstrous factories and ultimately their wealth and influence. In “The Communist Manifesto” Karl Marx discusses the effects of the Industrial Revolution in further dividing society by creating new social and economic hierarchies. In addition to his observation of the division of labor, Karl Marx believed, that due to the technological shift from craftsmanship to machinery this also caused division of labor and the appreciation of proletarian handmade goods was disregarded.

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

In parts one and two of The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels argue that class struggles, or for lack of better words, class exploitation, is the driving force behind all historical developments. In essence, the Communist Manifesto lobbied for no freedom, no rights, no property insurance, no inheritance, and free education. With that being said, the key elements of the Communist Manifesto (parts one and two) are the relationships between the proletariat and the bourgeois, as well as the proletariats and the communists. Marx displays that, just like earlier civilizations, the bourgeois, or as we know them today “modern capitalists”, have abused the proletariat class. In layman's terms, the upper class was taking advantage of the lower class.

Read More
269 Words | 2 Pages

The capitalist infrastructure of the world system has allowed the bourgeois to operate under a guise of an equal society. In the 19th century Europe’s engagement in liberalism led to two significant changes to society, the creation of the welfare state and the expansion of suffrage. These changes were highly welcomed by the working class and it was accepted throughout Western Europe that these changes were legitimately to create a fairer society. However, the boost of political and economic power of the working class was to curb their anger and discontent without jeopardising the activity of capitalism in the world economy. The bourgeois distracted the working classes from their exploitation through intra-European nationalism and nationalist

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

The proletarians goes through stages of development against its struggle with the bourgeois. It begins by, fighting against modern industry, the instrument of production that has rendered their wage and made their livelihood precarious. Unfortunately, as industry develops more, the wages of the working class even fluctuate more and the workers form a compact, to create a union in order to retain the rate of their wage. Through communication, different unions from various location centralize their struggles to form a political class to fight off the bourgeois. With the help of Communism, the proletarians will overthrow the

Read More
178 Words | 1 Pages

History, according to Marx and Engels, has been a series of class struggles—a constant tension between the oppressor and the oppressed. Given the nature of the relationship between these two actors, it is understood that domination is a key factor in the structure of the system; however, Marx and Engels are not concerned with the explicit forms of domination, but rather with the implicit ones. Domination, in essence, is the creation of a system in which one group of people has the power to serve their interests, which counter those of the dominated, and within which there is no viable alternative. The marking characteristic of the domination, nuanced in the writings of Marx and Engels, lies in a lack of awareness from the disadvantaged of the

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

Marx and Engel focused on class conflict as the driving force for their argument. Throughout history, there is a common theme of a caste society lasting for so long until the mistreated lower class attempt to break the cycle; but that system is only replaced with a new

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

In Marxian theory, there are two dominate ideas that explain the class struggle that has made up human history. The first is the social relations of production which describes the social divisions in labor. As a result of the social relations of production class struggles grow more complex. Yet, the bourgeoisie are able to keep the labor class unaware of this through ideological superstructures that provide them with a false

Read More

More about Conservatism Of Today's US White Working Class

Related Topics

Open Document