More handpicked essays just for you.
Louis XVI and the French Revolution
The causes and effects of 1789-1815 french revolution
What were the effects of the 1789 French Revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Louis XVI and the French Revolution
The French Revolution in 1789 lasted 10 years, changing Europe and human history. The Enlightenment thinkers believed there were numerous rights that were God-given and the French people had acquired those rights. They wanted to overthrow the king and queen, but the revolution caused death. The Reign of Terror was not justified because the French government executed about 40,000 people within those innocent as well. The Reign of Terror was not justified because (Threats to France) The Reign of Terror was not justified because the methods used were too extreme.
This leads to even more chaos in the country and the beginning of the Reign of Terror. Although the French formed the conscripted army which protected them from foreign threats, the entire nation fell into chaos and immense amounts of public executions
How revolutionary was the French Revolution? Did the Revolution simply replace the old ruling elite with a new bourgeois one? What were the major effects on different groups of people, including nobles, priests, peasants, urban workers, slaves, and women? This essay will address the French Revolution and the degree to which it can be aptly described as “revolutionary.” How revolutionary was the French Revolution? Was the storming of the Bastille, the destruction of feudalism, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of a fundamental and radical and revolutionary nature, or, alternatively, simply a series of historical events that results in the supplanting of one authoritarian regime for another and at great cost in
Louis XVI Louis XVI, who succeeded the throne in 1774, lacked the abilities to deal with the sate affairs wisely. The queen, Marie Antoinette, spent much time on court intrigues. Both the king and the queen failed to have an insight into the hopeless and dissatisfaction of people, which led to the later violent revolution. At that time, Louis XVI is regarded as a tyrant due to his incompetence and indecisiveness, which is the main reason of the break out of the French Revolution.
As a result of the French Revolution many thought that it gave an example for the disgruntled people of Britain to follow as a way of having their demands met through riots. This is because it was successful for France and their monarchy was overthrown. However, the argument that I propose is that because some of the factors that started the French Revolution were not relative to the difficulties occurring in Britain there was no threat seen. France were dealing with an absolute monarchy whereas Britain did not have that problem. Because there was not a direct correlation and link between the problems in France and Britain, the possibility of another revolution was
On the other hand, in France, members of the Third Estate led a revolt against the monarchy in hopes that by overthrowing the monarchy, they would be granted a constitution and a new assembly would be created with delegates of the Third Estate. Although the radicals were successful and a National Assembly was created, there were still problems. The worsening economic issues had not been solved and many citizens did not gain any rights. When the Revolution took a radical turn in 1792, the French Republic was formed. Finally, in 1799, after the end of the Reign of Terror in which the monarchy and its allies were executed, the French Revolution came to an end, with Napoleon gaining power over France.
into another war with Britain. At this time, “the French people rebelled against their king” (Deverell and White, 205), which became known as the “French Revolution - a rebellion of French people against their king in 1789” (Deverell and White, 205). After taking control of France, the French people beheaded their king and queen, “King Louis XVI in January 1793 and Queen Marie-Antoinette later that year” (Deverell and White, 206), causing many Americans to worry, “about the French Revolution’s violent riots and attacks on traditional authority… shocked many Americans” (Deverell and White, 206), ultimately causing many U.S. citizens to discontinue their support of this revolution. Then, the French Republic, which overthrew the French Monarchy, stated that they would declare war against all monarchies, and asked the U.S. for help because they had an alliance with the U.S. from the Revolutionary War.
By far the most popular solution to the crisis of authority in the era of religious wars was absolute monarchy. What is absolute Monarchy you may ask? Absolute Monarchy is a form of government where it’s ruled by a king and he has an absolute power over everyone and that there is no one higher or equal to him. Even though they are similar, Absolute monarchy is not the same as dictatorship. In a dictatorship it’s ruled by one person and they usual get their power through force the people are forced to follow their orders or they will be killed or hurt.
Was the French Revolution preventable? This is a question that is fascinating to think about. What could have been done differently to prevent this revolution that cost countless people their lives? Why were others willing to give their lives, for what cause? Why was life so turbulent?
However, the French revolution had led France to dictatorship and tens of years’ chaos after that. There was endless struggles between the left wing and the right wing during the French revolution. Although the left has published the Declaration of the rights of man, since the political environment was so unstable, that didn 't really changed the society into a republic. After “The Terror” which killed 40,000 people, Napoleon Bonaparte was crowned as an Emperor, a dictator of France. Then, after Napoleon died, monarchy and republic appeared alternately.
They had an election between all the Estate and everyone got to choose and the result was shocking. The King got executed by a very close result; the king got executed by 1 more vote. After king got executed by a very close result some people thought they were free now from absolute monarchy but other people knew there is a big war coming up. Their politic power was all gone and more people start dying because Robespierre stood up and started to execute every person who was going against revolution or did something bad or broke a law. Still need a conclusion Overall would all of the revolution be considered a success or a failure?
There were minor consequences at the time such as the taxes being increased ion the nobles instead of being on the poor. Some of the bigger consequences of the time were King Louis XVI being executed by guillotine by the Jacobin party on account of writing letters to other countries in Europe such as Prussia, to come and attack France and kill his people in hope that they would want to bring him back as king. These affect lots of people; we still see the consequences today. The French Revolution also set a precedent for a democratic French
The people of France tried to resolve issues peacefully but the king cared only about his power and acted at the expense of the citizens. According to the French Revolution portion of the Encyclopedia Britannica Online, the bourgeoisie wanted to have political power and the peasants did not want the feudal system to continue (French Revolution 2). A large meeting was held to discuss and solve issues, but, “rumors of an ‘aristocratic conspiracy’ by the king and the privileged to overthrow the Third Estate led to the Great Fear of July 1789.” (French Revolution 2). With the king of France being unwilling to actually resolve any conflicts, the only choice that was left was to overthrow the government as a whole and rebuild it into being a more fair and just system.
This was a big step forward to fixing the rigid social structure of France and opposing the monarchy’s oppression of peasants. Additionally, Louis was convicted of crimes such as conspiring against liberty. He was later executed on January 21, 1793. (Scandiffio) This shows that the monarchy was seen as very detrimental to the ideal of liberty, the conviction and execution of the king marked the end of the monarchy which was formerly a vital feature of the Old Regime.
This enormous massacre of people went against Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, all of which the national assembly declared were every man 's right. Much of the killing can be blamed on Robespierre and King Louis XVI. Although it was mostly a failure, some achievements can be seen through the Revolution. The French Revolution helped the French people become a more equal and socialist state. This showed Europe that the French were capable of revolting and they were not afraid to stand up for what they believed.
