More handpicked essays just for you.
Stanford prison experiment breakdown
Stanford prison experiment explained and theory
Thesis on stanford prison experiment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Stanford prison experiment was led by Philip Zimbardo with the purpose of studying the psychological effects of being a prisoner and a prison guard. The participants of the research study were male college students. Once selected, a coin toss determined which males would be prisoners and prison guards. The experiment took place at Stanford University, where a mock prison was crafted. Zimbardo acted as the warden or superintendent of the mock prison.
In 1971, Philip Zimbardo set out to conduct an experiment to observe behavior as well as obedience. In Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment, many dispute whether it was obedience or merely conforming to their predesigned social roles of guards and prisoners that transpired throughout the experiment. Initially, the experiment was meant to test the roles people play in prison environment; Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards, disposition, or had more to do with the prison environment. This phenomenon has been arguably known to possibly influencing the catastrophic similarities which occurred at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003.The
In the end there were less than half of the original inmates left, and one of the stand-by inmates had gone on a full blown food strike, and was severely reprimanded for it. The guards posed the other inmates against him and made him look as if he was the bad guy. Guards started to make his cell mates force and mock him in order to get him to eat. This tactic was to no avail, so they ended up putting him “in the hole” for three hours, even though the established limit was only one hour. It is completely understandable why the men that played the inmates were so enraged, there were established rules that were by no means followed throughout the experiment.
I decided to conduct my research on the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). This study was conducted in August of 1971 by a psychology professor named Phillip Zimbardo. The bases of the study was to focus on the psychology of human behavior, more specifically psychological effects between prison guard and prisoner. The experiment was to last 2 weeks but only lasted 6 days, due to dangerous behavior between the guards and prisoners. Twenty-four people volunteer to participate in the study, out of this group, they were randomly selected to be either prisoner or prison guard.
The experiment took place at Stanford University in August of 1971 in the basement of the psychology department. The Stanford prison experiment wanted to explore the adverse effects that oppression from prison guards would have on
This experiment was conducted in Stanford University by Dr. Zimbardo. During this two week long session, Dr. Zimbardo had several volunteers agree to act as prisoners and as prison guards. The prisoners were told to wait in their houses while the guards were to set up the mock prison, a tactic used by Dr. Zimbardo to make them fit into their roles more. The official police apprehended the students assigned to the role of prisoner from their homes, took mug shots, fingerprinted them, and gave them dirty prison uniforms. The guards were given clean guard uniforms, sunglasses, and billy clubs borrowed from the police.
The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study that took place at Stanford University in 1971. It studied the psychological effects of going to prison or becoming a prison guard. Researchers set out to find college students to participate and soon had many willing to take part. To begin, the students were separate into two groups, prisoners and prison guards. Philip Zimbardo, lead researcher and “prison superintendent” told the guards to take the experiment seriously and take on a real prison guard persona.
In 1973, a psychological experiment was orchestrated and performed by the professor of Psychology at Stanford University by the name of Phillip K. Zimbardo. This experiment was deemed unethical on many levels by countless people around the world. It raised questions about the ability of people who were forced to exist in oppressive or obedient roles and was known as The Stanford Prison Experiment. Philip Zimbardo began to research how prisoners and guards assume obedient and authoritative roles. The so called prisoners were acquired through an advertisement placed in a local newspaper.
Zimbardo believed that these actions were something that he can try and conceive on with the studies he was trying to conduct, but their was a specific prisoner going by his ID #8612 had to be released due to his early stages of depression and almost losing it being locked up in those cells. Zimbardo knew things were going to somehow get
The experiment I chose to research was the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Zimbardo in 1971. Zimbardo wanted to figure out if the brutality in prison was due to the guards or the prisoners. He asked questions such as dose “…the institutional roles of guard and prisoner embitter and harden even compassionate people.” He wanted to know if the people that are within the prison system make the prison violent or dose the prison make these people violent. Zimbardo conducted in experiment where male college students volunteered to play prison in a makeshift prison in the basement of the Stanford phycology department.
The male students were deceived by the real meaning of the study. The volunteers knew little about the study except it was to research the impact of human behavior in a prison environment. Zimbardo and his colleagues had already separated the participants by forming two groups and a coin decided their fate. One group had the role as prison guards and the others were prisoners.
Specifically, Zimbardo should have either created rules prior to the experiment, or stepped in once the guards began to starve, isolate, and sleep deprive prisoners. While Zimbardo assigned prisoners with numbers, and used none of their names, he still broke the ethical guidelines of confidentiality. It is vital to keep all data and information gathered from participants anonymous, so as not to affect their lives outside of the study (Myers & DeWall 2019). While he did not reveal their names or identifying information, he still publicly arrested the prisoners for anyone to see, such as neighbors, family, or any passersby (Mourinho335, Youtube, 2023). He obtained real police officers to question, cuff, and drive to the Stanford Psychology Building with the participants.
Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo questioned, “What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph?” (Zimbardo, 1971) In 1971 a psychologist named Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment on the effects prison has on young males with the help of his colleague Stanley Milgram. They wanted to find out if the reports of brutality from guards was due to the way guards treated prisoners or the prison environment.
The Stanford Prison experiment was created by Psychologist / Professor Zimbardo to further educate himself about the social structure of life and how people adapt to their surroundings. He created this experiment in which he gathered students from the university, out of those students who applied to be apart of this experiment, ten students became prisoners and eleven became guards. This experiment started off well, zimbardo gather information and learned a few things. He then started to realize that the actors that took on the guard role took it to a whole other level, they became more into their roles. They took torturing to a whole other level causing numerous individuals with the prisoner roles to have psychological problems, emotional
Westerfeld argued that teenagers are fondly prone to attract to stories or novels that depicts systems breaking down under its own contradictions. Teenagers are in a stage where they must cope with adult responsibilities including school, work, yet they are not fully granted with such adult powers to gain respect. With the two extremes he describes, dystopia and apocalypse, signifies the “Uglies”. This meaning constitute how in a society based on surveillance and control would have “zero tolerance. I agree with Westerfield’s argument.
