ipl-logo

Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment Summary

903 Words4 Pages

Joshua Arredondo
Professor Bdaha
Psych 001
18 April 2017
Zimbardo’s investigation: Stanford Prison Experiment Critiquing whether the experiments that Zimbardo imposed on the people that were involved was robust or not, it detailed much more information that was suddenly discovered to become a detriment to what his work was implying in doing. Zimbardo’s studies were measured in 1973, where his idea of American prisoners and guards had personalities that were damned to explain why the brutality levels started to increase in the jail institutions. Becoming inevitable with yourself is leading something to believe it’s true and the guards and prisoners were discovering it was certain and how it can conflict with them not respecting how the law …show more content…

He needed to figure this out, without the consent or liabilities he had to face after, he need to grab this conclusion of his and present it to not just his audience but the world.

Zimbardo’s statistics were more than aggravating and gave more than just a conclusion to the studies he directed towards the cellmates and the cell guards, which gave him information that struck the world the most. He sought to find what was wrong with the implementations and proceeded with tasks that were needed to fulfill the studies that were mainly directed to why prisoners and prison guards were beginning to build different compromises within themselves. The study consisted on 24 applicants that were embodied with this procedure and who were also going to gain something out of it which is to be paid $15 per day when the studies were concluded. The task that …show more content…

The guards and prisoners settled into their roles as clear as day and they began to use hatred as their primary solution for some of the guards to stop insulting and degrading them as if they were animals. Becoming submissive with the guards was something Zimbardo found satisfying but nonetheless suprising as the prisoners wanted to build a group of their own to go against the prisoners. The punishments that were given were more than just enough for them to say, “To hell with you and this,” but it was the beginning of a departure between emotion and conflict. More of what was going on with their state of being there began to change the way they behaved with simple diagnostics and traits that the guards were imposing on them. As the second day of this experiment approached, it was much more like all hell broke lose and the prisoners truly got the idea of not showing mercy to those who try to annihilate who they were and went against the prison guards and threw much more than a tirade. Zimbardo believed that these actions were something that he can try and conceive on with the studies he was trying to conduct, but their was a specific prisoner going by his ID #8612 had to be released due to his early stages of depression and almost losing it being locked up in those cells. Zimbardo knew things were going to somehow get

Show More
Related
406 Words | 2 Pages

The Stanford prison experiment was led by Philip Zimbardo with the purpose of studying the psychological effects of being a prisoner and a prison guard. The participants of the research study were male college students. Once selected, a coin toss determined which males would be prisoners and prison guards. The experiment took place at Stanford University, where a mock prison was crafted. Zimbardo acted as the warden or superintendent of the mock prison.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

In 1971, Philip Zimbardo set out to conduct an experiment to observe behavior as well as obedience. In Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment, many dispute whether it was obedience or merely conforming to their predesigned social roles of guards and prisoners that transpired throughout the experiment. Initially, the experiment was meant to test the roles people play in prison environment; Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards, disposition, or had more to do with the prison environment. This phenomenon has been arguably known to possibly influencing the catastrophic similarities which occurred at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003.The

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

The “guard mentality” can create negative traits that lead to the inhumane treatment and abuse of prisoners. On the other hand, prisoners that act out in violence and brutality can be traced back to the being confined in a cell. Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo created a mock prison experiment to see how these hypotheses truly affected the guards and prisoners. The subjects for the experiment

Read More
1481 Words | 6 Pages

Therefore, it would be difficult to try to replicate the study with complete accuracy to determine if the same results would be reached. Moreover, Zimbardo’s study could not be conducted again due to the ethical standards set in place today. Hypothetically, if we were to conduct the Stanford Prison Experiment study again, I believe we would see the same results. For example, subsequent similar studies have taken place that have similar findings to the Stanford experiment. At the end of the day it is not the characteristics of the guards or the inmates, but the social situation and the system in which the situation occurs that influences such behavior.

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

Before the experiment began, all participants went through a psychological evaluation to make sure they were of sound mind (Onishi & Herbert, 2016). Once the experiment began the “prisoners” were arrested and taken to a simulated prison where they were stripped searched and demoralized. During the 6 days that the study lasted, conduct between both sides, prisoners and guards, was less than expectable. Both sides “acted as though a punishment was justified as an acceptable response to a breach of the rules” (Onishi & Herbert, 2016), rules that were vaguely explained.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

The guards were instructed to maintain order anyway they wanted without using physical violence. Zimbardo wanted the guards to seem intimidating while the prisoners were made to look inferior and were to be referred to with their ID number only. After the prisoners were assigned their roles and the guards took their post was the effect of the experiment finally setting in. On the morning of the second day the prisoners began to rebel against the guards by ripping off their ID numbers and barring the doors while taunting the guards. This event was the first step down the slippery slope that would follow.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

What did they gain in World War II? G1 Bill was passed which provided the veterans with low-interest mortgages and payments for attending college or trade schools. It also provided year of unemployment compensation First time in the history of the world women fought war first hand. They gained respect and slowly became equal part of society with men. Fighting in WWII gave them a leeway in fighting the racism and Jim Crow laws.

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

The guards were cruel and even made the prisoners do menial tasks. The prisoners also broke and could no longer control their emotions, some prisoners also went into depression. For example, one prisoner had to be released after 36 hours because of uncontrollable bursts of screaming, crying and anger. But, the experiment had long term effects that Zimbardo thought to be superior to the short-term effects, hence he decided to continue the experiment. Zimbardo chose to get the long-term effects instead of worrying about the short-term effects.

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

There was some confidentiality among the volunteers because they were given ID numbers and were not allowed to use their names and the guards were addressed as just that. The anonymity and confidentiality of the experiment didn't exist because the volunteers were arrested outside their homes and the researchers knew the selected men. Zimbardo's experiment is quasi and observational with the means of discovering how social influence affects people in a prison like environment. Each participant was given a role and some adapted quickly and took it seriously especially when given the power of

Read More
2332 Words | 10 Pages

Prisoners were stripped of their identities, forced to wear uniforms, and referred to using assigned numbers rather than their names. This deindividuation (the perceived loss of personal individuality) led to a breakdown of social norms and ethical boundaries, with some participants experiencing severe emotional trauma. Another ethical issue with the Stanford Prison Experiment was the lack of proper oversight and intervention. Zimbardo, in his role as the lead researcher, became so immersed in the role of prison superintendent that he failed to recognize the unethical behavior unfolding within the experiment, even as a psychologist. It was only after a graduate student raised concerns about the treatment of the participants that the experiment was prematurely halted after just six days instead of the planned two weeks.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

During the experiment, a group of college-aged men were divided into two groups: prisoners and correctional officers. Throughout

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

The participants were randomly selected by flipping a coin. They were either made a guard or an inmate; There were 10 inmates and 11 guards. Zimbardo wanted the “criminals” to feel like real criminals and treated like real criminals. He had the participants arrested at their own homes and taken to the police station to go through the whole process of

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

The guards would force the prisoners to criticize one another, which tore down prisoner 416 in the end of the experiment and ultimately lead to ending the experiment. Overall, I think that this experiment had good expectations and goals, but needed a better plan. The men being involved needed to know more about what they were signing up for because many men didn’t know they would be arrested from their houses and treated just as if they were prisoners. This experiment opened a lot of people’s eyes because it put into reality how prisoners are treated in real life.

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

In 1971 Dr. Zimbardo a psychologist professor at Stanford University conducted an experiment with 24 college student and recruited them to play the roles of guards and prisoners in a mock prison system. This experience was to gain insight of daily prison life between the guards and the prisoner when one has power, which we be the guards. In on the other hand the prisoner who will be the powerless this was the reason to create a prison environment that would fabricated simulation of a real life prisoners and guards daily activities. Professor Zimbardo fabricated a simulation of a jail by converting the basement of Stanford University to a prison. The 24 male causation college students from various colleges in the United States were evaluation for any abnormalities before the experiment they all were normal and capable to do the experience.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

In 1971, Philip Zimbardo a psychology professor, at Stanford who desired to learn about the development of norms and the results of roles, labels, and social expectations in a fabricated prison environment.

Read More

More about Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment Summary

Related Topics

Open Document